Category Archives: Uncategorized

How To Contribute To the SRDC/Sehwah Summer Cultural Exchange Program Virtual Camp

The Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC) and Sehwah Liberia encourage concerned activists and members of the Global African Family to Contribute to our Inaugural Summer Cultural Exchange Program.

Registrations for the Program are currently being accepted. The Program is designed for high school students from Africa and the Diaspora who wish to learn about various aspects of the Global African Family and make connections with each other.

Donations are also graciously accepted. Online, the PayPal link https://paypal.me/srdcinternational?locale.x=en_US can be used for donations as well as for registrations and tuition payments.

Below is a brief description of the Program, which can be read in full on the websites https://kuumbareport.com and http://www.srdcinternational.org:

SRDC Announces the Summer Cultural Exchange Program Virtual Camp to benefit the Liberia Library Project
SRDC Summer Cultural Exchange Program
A Summer Camp in Support of the Liberia Library Project
Produced and Sponsored by Sehwah-Liberia and the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC)

Overview

The Liberian Summer Cultural Exchange Program will recruit 84 high school students. This includes students born of families from different countries in Africa, and the descendants of kidnapped Africans in the Diaspora.

The students will learn the necessary skills to become specialists doing effective research in the area of their choice. The finished product will be utilized as exhibits in the 21st Century Liberian Library Project Facility.

This cultural interaction will broaden the students’ view and vision of Africa, leading to more effective communication, along with developing skills in project management, compromise/consensus, negotiation, decision making and problem solving.

The success and completion of the Pilot Summer Cultural Exchange Program will lead to a trip to Liberia for the students who complete this summer program successfully. They would then become a part of the first phase of building the Library in Monrovia, Liberia (scheduled for completion by the year 2027). The Library will be the cornerstone of information accessible to Africans around the world in search of our common history and culture.

For full details, visit the following posts, which include fillable Registration Forms and a PayPal link for registration and tuition fees:

https://kuumbareport.com/2020/06/16/srdc-announces-the-summer-cultural-exchange-program-virtual-camp-to-benefit-the-liberia-library-project/

http://srdcinternational.org/?p=3315

Detailed questions about the Program can be directed to Mama Maisha Washington at maishawashington_865@hotmail.com.

For a little background information on the work of Sehwah Liberia, check out this story about their recent Food Distribution Project for families in Liberia who are suffering from food insecurity as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. The project was carried out by Sehwah Liberia with support from the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC):

https://kuumbareport.com/2020/06/18/sehwah-liberia-inc-and-srdc-report-on-covid-19-emergency-food-distribution-in-liberia/

http://srdcinternational.org/?p=3396

If you are not registering for the Summer Cultural Exchange Program (the Virtual Summer Camp) but would like to make a donation to SRDC’s effort, the same PayPal link can be used:

https://paypal.me/srdcinternational?locale.x=en_US

We are looking forward to a rewarding and successful Virtual Summer Camp. Proceeds will support SRDC and Sehwah Liberia’s program to build the first-ever Public Library serving the African nations of Liberia, Cote D’Ivoire, Sierra Leone and Guinea-Conakry.

Sehwah Liberia Inc. and SRDC Report on COVID-19 Emergency Food Distribution in Liberia

SEHWAH LIBERIA Inc. &
Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus
REPORT
ON THE EMERGENCY RELIEF PROGRAM:
“COVID-19 FOOD DISTRIBUTION IN LIBERIA”

Prepared by: Louise W.M. Siaway
SEHWAH-Liberia
Tel #: +231 880445456/778541208
Email: louisesiaway@gmail.com

EDITOR’S NOTE: For the PDF version of this Report, with additional photographs depicting the Sehwah Food Distribution Effort, please click the link below:

SEHWAH LIBERIA and SRDC COVID 19 Food Distribution Report

Introduction

On 31 December 2019, a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown aetiology was reported in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. On 9 January 2020, China CDC reported a novel coronavirus as the causative agent of this outbreak, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Coronaviruses (COV) have been identified as human pathogens since the 1960’s. Coronaviruses infect humans and many other vertebrates. Illness in humans is mostly respiratory or gastrointestinal infections, however symptoms can range from the common cold to more severe lower respiratory infections such as pneumonia. A broad range of coronaviruses are found in bats, which might play a crucial role in the virus evolution of alpha- and beta-coronavirus lineages in particular. However, other animal species can also act as an intermediate host and reservoir. Zoonotic coronaviruses have emerged in recent years to cause human outbreaks, such as the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) since 2012.

Madam Louise Siaway of Sehwah speaks to community Elders in Liberia during the food distribution effort.

On the 10th of April 2020, the Government of Liberia declared a State of Emergency, coupled with a Nationwide Lockdown. In the wake of this State of Emergency, SEHWAH and its collaborating US based partner organization SRDC (Sixth Regions Diaspora Caucus) launched a food distribution drive to supplement the government’s efforts in providing food assistance to the needy people. This was necessary in order to alleviate the hardship and suffering which came as the result of the government’s stay at home order. While the government’s stay at home order is necessary to prevent the spread of the deadly pandemic, enforcing it was very problematic because the common complaint of many people was, “how can we survive if we cannot go out to look for our daily bread?”

In wealthy nations, governments provide stimulus relief packages to their citizens while they are told to stay home and practice social distancing. In Liberia, such a gesture from the government was not put in place and the economic hardship was creating problems among the citizens. As such, SEHWAH Liberia Inc. and its collaborating partner, SRDC joined together to launch the fund raising campaign in support of their food donation campaign. This campaign consisted of food and material distributions in various communities in Monrovia. This campaign mainly targeted the most vulnerable such as children, elderly men and women as well as the people living with disabilities.

Residents and activists meet during the food distribution effort.

According to Madam Louise Siaway, former Assistant Minister for Cultural Affairs at the Ministry of Information and founder of SEHWAH, the recipients of the food donation have been very grateful and thankful to the SEHWAH-SRDC partnership for thinking about them in this time of serious health crisis and its adverse consequences. Along with the food, we also donated face masks as well as bottles of hand sanitizer

One Month and 6 Days of Food Distribution

The SEHWAH-SRDC food distribution initiative started on Saturday, April 17 and continued until May 23, 2020. We operated on the daily schedule from 9 a.m. to 2:00 pm, including weekends. We began with 100 50lbs bags of rice. The response to that initial distribution was so overwhelming and we saw the needs to continue. Along with rice, we also distributed hand sanitizers and face masks as well as carried out preventive health education along the way. Over this period of time, we served women with children, and people living with disabilities and elderly who are disproportionately affected by the state of emergency lockdown.

Impact on Food system

Local food systems are fragile in a country like Liberia. About 85 percent of the total workforce is from the informal sector, they include agricultural and other workers who entirely depend on daily wages as a mode of living. These vulnerable groups and their families are the hardest hit during these unprecedented times. Even though the sudden imposition of the countrywide lockdown was a wise move to contain the spread of the coronavirus, local food systems were disrupted. The fear of the virus spread faster than the virus itself, leading to the following consequences below. The worst part of the countrywide lockdown was that it coincided with the country’s rainy season and partial harvesting time of a variety of crops of the season. Vegetables and fruits were ripened and ready to pick. Following the lockdown declaration, temporary workers in cities had to leave to get back to their villages as surviving in the city without regular salaries was implausible. As transportation froze and sky rocketed, many people were left with no choice but to defy the curfew schedules. The most noteworthy thing was the exodus of local migrant from Montserrado to other rural areas of the country such as Nimba, Grand Bassa, River Cess, Lofa, Bong, Grand Gedeh, etc.

SEHWAH /SIXTH REGION DIASPORA CAUCUS INVOLVEMENT

SEHWAH/SRDC emergency food distribution imitative was principally intended as an emergency food assistance under an emergency condition. It was intended to complement the efforts of the government. In order to facilitate the food distribution, SEHWAH/SRDC engaged the services of many volunteers. These volunteers were very instrumental in the overall success of our mission. These mobilizations were made through community leaders who played the major role in our efforts.

Madam Louise Siaway and members of Sehwah and the COVID-19 Response Team talk with residents during the food distribution effort.

ACCOUNTABILITY

As the curfew hours are extended from 6:00Am-3:00PM to 6:00Am – 6:00PM, economic activities are gradually picking up. As such, our food distribution campaign came to an end on May 23, 2020. Our efforts were aided greatly by the fund raising campaign. We received donations from individual Liberians as well as the SRDC. Below is the breakdown of the total amount raised and how it was expended.

REACTION

The family head that received our relief items passed very positive comments. During distribution our team members interviewed a lot of affected people. The affected families appreciated our efforts as they received relief food items in timely manner. They said that SEHWAH Liberia/SRDC has selected genuinely affected and the poorest families who have no other alternative to provide food. Local people assisted our team members during distribution as they were satisfied with our beneficiary selection and quantity of food. Special emphasis was placed on the most affected families. We also involved volunteers from the local community to ensure that we identified real affected and poverty-stricken families. Local people gave us adequate cooperation in this regard.

Some of the bags of rice that were distributed along with other food items.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I would like to express my deepest appreciation to all those who contributed to the success of this project. We are thankful to the youths and leaders of the communities we served. We acknowledge with special gratitude the very important roles of SRDC in this effort to prevent the spread of the deadly pandemic as well as helping people with food donation. This symbolizes a genuine collaborative partnership between the Continental Africans and the African American communities. This truly indicates that we are working in the spirit of Pan Africanism as envisioned by our great leaders from Africa and the African diaspora. This project was a great opportunity and learning experience for us all, coupled with experience on the current situation and condition of Corona Virus and the adverse impact on the economy and the lives of the people of Liberia.

The elation and gratification of this project will be incomplete without mentioning and thanking all the people who helped to make it possible. Their supports and encouragements were very crucial in this endeavor. They are the two SEHWAH representatives in the US, Mr. Kalifala Donzo -SEHWAH’s Outreach Coordinator and Mr. Nvasekie Konneh -SEHWAH’s Public Affairs Coordinator. It was Mr. Donzo who suggested the idea. Having said that, I will like to reiterate that our success with this campaign would not have been possible without our collaborating partnership with Sixth Regions Diaspora Caucus (SRDC). This project should only motivate us to continue our discussion on the Library and other important projects we are hoping to carry on. We also like to extend gratitude to the Liberian media, both print and electronic.

It’s always an amazing experience to work with people from diverse backgrounds. At last but not the least I am thankful to all SEHWAH team and friends who helped and encouraged us to move forward with the project.

We are thankful to my family for giving encouragement, enthusiasm and invaluable assistance of $1500.00 to complete this food distribution projects.

Hon. Senator Prince Y. Johnson, for the use of his pickup two times to get to the rice store.
Mr. Amos Togba for use of his Jeep to delivered on Saturday April 18 and 19.
Mr. Abraham Donzo for the use of pickup for delivers from April 19 to May 23rd, 2020.
Thomas Togba who input our daily beneficiaries’ data
Sermah Salassane head of youth that mapped the areas before delivery.
Mrs. Victoria Kuma Richards who helped hand out the food
Mrs. Pauline M. Korkor who helped hand out other items
Ms. Mulbah who helped hand out food

SRDC Announces the Summer Cultural Exchange Program Virtual Camp to benefit the Liberia Library Project

SRDC Summer Cultural Exchange Program
A Summer Camp in Support of the Liberia Library Project
Produced and Sponsored by
Sehwah-Liberia
and the
Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC)

APPLICATION:

Overview

The Liberian Summer Cultural Exchange Program will recruit 84 high school students. This includes students born of families from different countries in Africa, and the descendants of kidnapped Africans in the Diaspora.

The students will learn the necessary skills to become specialists doing effective research in the area of their choice. The finished product will be utilized as exhibits in the 21st Century Liberian Library Project Facility.

This cultural interaction will broaden the students’ view and vision of Africa, leading to more effective communication, along with developing skills in project management, compromise/consensus, negotiation, decision making and problem solving.

The success and completion of the Pilot Summer Cultural Exchange Program will lead to a trip to Liberia for the students who complete this summer program successfully. They would then become a part of the first phase of building the Library in Monrovia, Liberia (scheduled for completion by the year 2027). The Library will be the cornerstone of information accessible to Africans around the world in search of our common history and culture.

This document includes:

Class Descriptions 
Camp Schedule (List and Grid) 

Course Registration Form (Must be completed by Applicants)
Course Selection Form (Must be completed by Applicants)

CLASS DESCRIPTIONS:

I. The following courses are required for all students:

· CODING
· SWAHILI
· WEST AFRICAN FOODWAYS/COOKING

II. Students may choose one of the following specialized classes:

· AFRICA – Geography/Archaeology

This team will do a Geographical mapping of Africa, including all physical features of the continent, all the natural resources, and explore archaeological digs that expose our long history on the planet. The team will create a database of their discovery. They will also date and tell the history of the artifact/natural resource explaining how it was or is still used today.

End product: The team will create a virtual exhibit of the artifacts, natural resources, physical features of Africa and the historical story of our homeland. The history will have a written narration, as well as a video of the team explaining their discoveries.

· ORAL HISTORY

This team will learn how to do historical research and document the histories of the main ethnic groups of Liberia. The team will have a virtual team of high school students from Liberia who will jointly work with students from the U.S.

End Product: Production of oral tapes and videos for exhibits about the people of Liberia.

· LINGUISTICS

This team will begin the process of researching and documenting all of the African languages spoken in Liberia. There will be a virtual team in Liberia with which students will work. The team will get oral tapes, as well as written examples of each language.

End Product: A book for younger children, oral tapes and videos of conversations.

· CULTURE – Art / Music 

This team will research and document all forms of art, music and drama found in Liberia. There will be a Liberian team working with U.S. team. They will begin the process of collecting and preserving all the different types of art produced. They will research and collect all instruments designed and developed in Liberia/Africa.

End Product: Collections of Art and instruments. Oral report on tapes and videos of music for exhibits.

· PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Engineering / Architecture / Materials

This team will research the engineering needs, learn how architecture designs are developed and ascertain the materials needed for building the library. The team will look for both quality and best prices for materials.

End Product: Engineering specs, architectural plans and list of materials and samples. Report from each area in video presentation telling the story of building the library as a welcome exhibit from youth developers.

· ENVIRONMENT – Water, Soil, Sewage

This team will research the three crucial elements needed to have a fully functioning facility. The soil quality and depth which will determine how many levels can be built underground and how high the building can be. The team will determine access to water and sewage, as well as the impact of earthquakes seasonal (rainy, dry) conditions rainfall on soil quality. They will also examine the suitability of developing building materials (cement, bricks, etc.) from local soil.

End Product: A video explaining environmental research and how decisions were made that were considered best for the environment

· ASTRONOMY / IT

This team will research the night sky and African stories related to it. They will also determine the technical capacity of the facility and necessary equipment to create a vibrant interactive virtual world for the library.

End Product: The team will build a telescope and create an astronomy show for the planetarium.

III. Students may choose any or all of the following classes:

· YOGA
· ZUMBA
· AFRICAN DANCE

Camp Schedule (List)
Monday through Friday

9am to 9:45 am – Good Morning Activities. Students will have a choice between:

Yoga
Zumba
African Dance

9:45 to 10:00am – Snack – Fruit

10:00am to 11:30am – Class

11:30am to Lunch – Project chat and Music.

5 weeks, focus/camera on one ethnic group participating in the camp. Sixth week, Pan-African cultural program

12:30 to 2:00pm – Class

2:00 to 2:30 – Required Classes

Swahili (Monday, Wednesday)
Coding (Tuesday, Thursday)

Friday 10:00 am – Virtual Field Trip

Friday 1:00 pm – Required Class

West African Foodways Class; make an African dish for Family dinner

For the Camp Schedule in Grid Form, see below:

Pan African Summer Camp 2020 Camp Schedule Grid

For the Camp Registration and Course Selection Form in fillable format, scroll down and see below:

Registration Fee: $75.00 US
Includes: T-shirt, Cap, Backpack, Toolkit and Class Kit
Tuition: $150.00 US per Week for 6 Weeks = $900.00
Total Registration and Tuition: $975.00 US
Pay with PayPal:

https://paypal.me/srdcinternational?locale.x=en_US

Militarization of U.S. Police Departments: Some History by JUSTICE INITIATIVE

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is another commentary from Atlanta-based human rights organization Justice Initiative, founded by Heather Gray.  Here, she looks into the history of militarized police and its repressive roots at home and abroad.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
— Martin Luther King, Jr

Weapons of War On Our Streets: A Guide to the Militarization of America’s Police (Ammo.com)

Heather Gray
June 2, 2020
Justice Initiative
(Link to article)

Preface

Once again, with the recent tragic killing of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd, young activists are wisely demonstrating throughout the United States demanding an end to this injustice, racism and white supremacy and of police violence.

Strange as it might seem, I began to learn more about the history of contemporary U.S. police violence while in the Philippines in 1989, which led me to better understand what we are experiencing regarding today’s scenario.

It is also likely that Donald Trump recently held a national call with governors of U.S. states to explore ways to take federal troops into the various states. The fact is, however, that the U.S. government is not allowed to send federal troops into the states at will, thanks to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 after the Civil War. “The purpose of the act… (was) to limit the powers of the Federal government in using its military personnel to enforce the state laws” (Posse Comitatus Act – Wikipedia).

Below is some history of the militarization of the U.S. police departments thanks to the early U.S. colonization of the Philippines and of the restraints of the federal government to militarize the states due to the Posse Comitatus Act.March 24, 2018 Atlanta “March for Our Lives in Atlanta” (Photo: Heather Gray)

America’s Early Colonial History

In the 20th and 21rst centuries, U.S. policies around the world, both economically and militarily, have been questionable at best. U.S. violent international policies outside the Americas started with the Philippines in the beginning of the 20th century. These policies, more often incredibly violent, as mentioned, are coming back to haunt us. An example of this includes the U.S. international policy of “Low-Intensity Conflict” (LIC) related to the militarization of our domestic police forces.

After Philippine-American War (1899 to 1902), the U.S. launched LIC, at the beginning of the century in its Philippine colony, with the creation of the Philippine Constabulary. The Philippine Constabulary is, even today, a national police organization created principally to protect American and Filipino corporate and military elite interests. The legacy of this policy is that it now serves as a model for a militarized policing system in our 21rst century domestic American life.

I generally define the “elite” as neoconservative and neoliberal economic proponents along with their corporate capitalist supporters and colleagues.

The U.S. government and its elite tend to often try out policies internationally before introducing them into the U.S. and, as in the Philippines, the U.S. elite have always demonstrated their desire to control the American people. They certainly don’t want opposition to their policies or threats to their economic control, as we have consistently witnessed throughout the history of the U.S. Witness the FBI, the CIA, COINTELPRO, etc, and the assassination of many of our persuasive and profound leaders, such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and others.

Constraints on Militarization in the United States: Some History

I realize this is hard to believe, but often, the U.S. elite are constrained in implementing controlling policies in the U.S. domestic arena due to some laws that prevent this. They then will try to circumvent the restricting laws or attempt to overturn them altogether.

Not long after the end of the Civil War (in 1865), the United States government sent federal troops to the South to enforce the policies of the post-war Reconstruction period:

The Reconstruction period addressed how the eleven seceding southern states would regain what the Constitution calls a “republican form of government” and be re-seated in Congress; it addressed the civil status of the former leaders of the Confederacy, and the Constitutional and legal status of freedmen, especially their civil rights and whether they should be given the right to vote. Intense controversy erupted throughout the South over these issues….Congress removed civilian governments in the South in 1867 and put the former Confederacy under the rule of the U.S. Army. The army conducted new elections in which the freed slaves could vote, while whites who had held leading positions under the Confederacy were temporarily denied the vote and were not permitted to run for office (Reconstruction – Wikipedia).

Needless to say, it is important to note, as referred to above, that many of the federal policies during the post Civil War Reconstruction Era were needed and appreciated regarding the rights of freed slaves. And it is also important to note, then, that what is critical regarding federal government intervention, as Trump is wanting, is the policies and/or political orientation of the federal government itself. If the orientation of the federal government is oppressive of the rights of all the people, then the last thing the majority of the people would want is federal troops coming into their states.

The Compromise of 1877: When, in 1877, there was a highly contested presidential election between Democractic candidate Samuel Tilden from New York and Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio, a compromise was generated between the southern ‘Democractic’ delegation and the northern ‘Republicans’. This became known as the “Compromise of 1877“, in which the south agreed to support the Hayes presidency in return for the removal of the federal troops from the South (Compromise of 1877 – Wikipedia).

In other words, the southern elite wanted to once again have controlling interests over the freed slaves and everything else in the South without federal interference.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878: The compromise between the northern and southern political parties, then, led to Congress passing the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878. “The purpose of the act… (was) to limit the powers of the Federal government in using its military personnel to enforce the state laws” (Posse Comitatus Act – Wikipedia).

There are exceptions, however, to the Posse Comitatus Act. If a state chooses to violate its citizens’ rights under the constitution and/or federal laws, federal military troops can then be sent in. This was the case when President Eisenhower sent troops to Arkansas in 1957 to enforce the Supreme Court’s “Brown v Board of Education” decision to integrate American schools. Eisenhower, reluctantly, I might add, responded to the obstructive opposition by the arch segregationist, Arkansas Governor, Orval Faubus.JI Military Police 3: U.S. Troops in Little Rock, Arkansas 1957 (History.com)

Since the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, therefore, the U.S. government has been constrained overall in the use of military force domestically in any of the U.S. states.

This constraint, though, has never been the case in U.S. international policies and, therefore, the U.S. has engaged in militarizing the domestic arenas of other countries that fall under the auspices of the U.S. empire or areas of interest (such as the Philippines, South American countries, the Middle East, etc.).

Low-Intensity Conflict (LIC) is a “Policing/Militarization of the U.S. Empire”

What is “Low-Intensity Conflict”? There are seemingly many definitions of the term. Regarding the impact of LIC on the U.S. personnel, however, I refer to it as “low-intensity” only for the U.S. military and/or the controlling elite. In other words, the U.S. military does not get its hands dirty nor is it violently impacted by LIC, but instead it trains others to do this insidious work. JUSMAG- Philippines headquarters in Manila 1989
(JUSMAG – Joint United States Military Assistance Group) (Photo – Heather Gray)

“Low Intensity Conflict” is simultaneously “high intensity” for those outside the U.S. who are victims of these U.S. international LIC policies. These victims are often under intimidating surveillance, sometimes suffer or are killed by summary execution, torture, displacement etc. by military or police in their own country who are often trained philosophically and militarily by the U.S.

In other words, LIC is a method employed to “police/militarize” the U.S. empire on behalf of U.S. political and economic interests. This could also be referred to as “war capitalism” (Beckert).

After the Philippine-American War, the Philippines became a colony of the United States. This was the first imperial venture by the United States outside its hemisphere and it set the tone for the 20th century policies in other countries including those in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. These other countries were not ‘colonies’ but are ‘countries’ the U.S. has had an interest in and/or has wanted to make sure the governments complied to U.S. trade policies or other economic interests.

In 1901, then, the U.S. created of the Philippine Constabulary (PC) to perform LIC policies and intimidate the existing Filipino revolutionaries. It is still in existence today. (Philippine Constabulary – Wikipilipinas)

It was created under the Commission Act No. 175 by Captain Henry T. Allen, an American, who was later dubbed as the “Father of the Philippine Constabulary”. It was first named as the Insular Constabulary and later renamed to Philippine Constabulary in December 1902.

The Constabulary was the first of the four service commands of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. It was a gendarmerie-type police force (armed police force or a militarized police force) to replace the Spanish Guardia Civil (Spanish Civil Guard – Wikipedia).

The Constabulary was later integrated with the municipal police force, (to become the) Integrated National Police (and then) into the current “Philippine National Police” on January 29, 1991.

In layman’s terms, the militarized Philippine Constabulary has served in the interest of the U.S. and Filipino elite against the revolutionary movements in the Philippines that would, for example, choose to rid the country of its exploitative corporate and military ventures. At the very least, the revolutionary movements throughout Philippine history have attempted to end a government that relies so heavily on and adherence to the United States dictates. (Read the history of the Hukbalahap in the mid 20th century and/or the New Peoples Army (NPA), and about the National Democratic Front in the Philippines in the excellent book The Philippines Reader: A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship, and Resistance by Daniel Schirmer and Stephen Shalom).

Michael McClintock describes an example of the Constabulary military actions in the 1950s:

The combined army and Philippines Constabulary (PC) force level rose dramatically from 32,000 at the beginning of 1950 to 40,000 in 1951 and 56,000 in late 1952. Air power, too, became increasingly important as U.S. assistance stepped up, with some 2,600 bombing and strafing runs reported between I August 1950 and 30 June 1952 alone (some sorties allegedly with support from U. S. planes out of Clark Air Force Base). Requests for napalm were initially turned down on State Department advice, but from late 1951 American napalm was supplied and used both for crop destruction and antipersonnel purposes. A record system devised for Philippine military intelligence, which traced all known supporters of the wartime Huk resistance movement, was operational by the end of 1950; according to one source, it was used in screening operations that resulted in some 15,000 arrests in the first six months of 1951 (McClintock).

In other words, regarding the Philippine Constabulary, there is a fine distinction, if any, between what is “policing” and what is “military” operations.

On-Going U.S. International “Low-Intensity Conflict” Policies

When militarizing the domestic arena of its areas of influence in the world, the United States, as mentioned, pays no attention to its own domestic laws as a model that do not easily allow for this militarization in its own domestic sphere.Signs in Manila, Philippines 1989 (Photo – Heather Gray)

In fact, international LIC policies have been implemented by the United States throughout much of the 20th century. The Philippines is just one example. Regarding LIC in South America, we need to consider the U.S. School of the Americas (SOA) or what is now referred to as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC). Founded in 1946, it is located in Fort Benning, Georgia. In this school, the United States trains the military of South American countries to serve a somewhat similar role as the Philippine Constabulary and/or even more violent and extreme, if that’s possible. Filipino army officers have also been trained at the SOA.

We could say that the WHINSEC in the U.S. is training the South American military to fight against their own people, as is true with the Philippine Constabulary.

So, instead of the United States military going into El Salvador, Nicaragua, Columbia, Argentina, etc. the U.S. trains troops from these countries to serve the interests of the United States and the friendly elite of the South American countries. Again, it is a “policing” or “militarization” of countries in what the United States considers its empire of interest.

The “School of the Americas Watch” has a sizable listing of human rights violations committed by graduates of the SOA/WHINSEC. In fact, the “School of the Americas Watch” is under the leadership of Father Roy Bourgeois who has for years wisely tried to close down this school.

School of the Americas Watch

One example, below, of these human rights violations is by the SOA graduate General Juan Orlando Zeped from El Salvador who took a course at the SOA in 1975 on “Urban Counterinsurgency Ops”.; and in the 1969, the “Unnamed Course.” Below is some information about General Zeped’s tragic behavior:

Jesuit massacre, 1989: (Zeped) Planned the assassination of 6 Jesuit priests and covered-up the massacre, which also took the lives of the priests’ housekeeper and her teen-age daughter. (United Nations Truth Commission Report on El Salvador, 1993) Other war crimes, 1980’s: The Non-Governmental Human Rights Commission in El Salvador also cites Zepeda for involvement in 210 summary executions, 64 tortures, and 110 illegal detentions. (Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador) Member of the “La Tandona” and held the rank of colonel and served as the Vice Minister of Defense at the time of the massacre. Prior to the massacre he publicly accused the UCA of being the center of operations for the FMLN and was present for the meetings where orders were given for the massacre. He was later promoted to the rank of general (Notorious Grads – School of the Americas).

The Domestic Military: Contemporary Police Departments and Militarization

I have always assumed that the U.S. would also want to implement the LIC strategies domestically or have increased domestic militarization in the U.S. as well, that, as mentioned, the Posse-Comitatus Act has largely prevented. So, rather than sending in the U.S. military into the cities, one way the U.S. has managed to circumvent Posse-Comitatus is to “militarize” the local domestic police forces, which is now happening to a significant degree in the United States. It’s also another way to increase the huge U.S. military budget, as the domestic police departments are obtaining left over military equipment, as if that’s what we want or need in our cities!

In many ways, the militarization of police departments affords the opportunity for the police to “fight against” the American people rather then serve in the “interests” and “protection” of the American people. This is similar to the U.S. LIC trained military recruits in South America and elsewhere.

In a 2014 article on Alternet, Art Kane states:

The “war on terror” has come home-and it’s wreaking havoc on innocent American lives. The culprit is the militarization of the police….

A recent New York Times article by Matt Apuzzo reported that in the Obama era, “police departments have received tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft.” The result is that police agencies around the nation possess military-grade equipment, turning officers who are supposed to fight crime and protect communities into what look like invading forces from an army. And military-style police raids have increased in recent years, with one count putting the number at 80,000 such raids last year (Kane).

Art Kane‘s “11 Shocking Facts About America’s Militarized Police Forces” are:

1. It harms, and sometimes kills, innocent people.
2. Children are impacted.
3. The use of SWAT teams is unnecessary.
4. The “war on terror” is fueling militarization.
5. It’s a boon to contractor profits.
6. Border militarization and police militarization go hand in hand.
7. Police are cracking down on dissent.
8. Asset forfeitures are funding police militarization.
9. Dubious informants are used for raids.
10. There’s been little debate and oversight.
11. Communities of color bear the brunt.

Included in the concerns about militarized police forces should also be about information the training police officers receive altogether, as in attitudes and justice toward the other.

Kane provides an excellent narrative for each of the above facts. I witnessed virtually all of these “11 shocking facts” in the Philippines in 1989. They are now, unfortunately, to be witnessed in the United States as well.

The unfair and disastrous “Low-Intensity Conflict” policies forced on many other parts of the world have come home to roost.

Summary

It is encouraging, however, that there is now significant organizing in the country against this trend of police militarization and gun violence overall. It needs to also be extended as well to the countries throughout the world that are continuing to be victims of these U.S. “Low-Intensity Conflict” policies. Closing down the School of the Americas would also be a good first start and implementing policies that do not allow for a militarization of our police departments would be another, and should be addressed with all deliberate speed. Many American police have also been trained in Israel and this should end altogether.

Americans also need to address the training American police departments are implementing with the domestic police recruits and police staff altogether. For example, how much of the low-intensity conflict model is being implemented. In other words, is the violence by the police used to service the corporate and elite interests in America? And further, is the training racist, biased, altogether encouraging discriminatory behavior and the use of force by the police throughout the country.

When Martin Luther King said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” he was certainly correct by inferring that injustices conducted by the U.S. elsewhere will come home!

Gray & Associates, PO Box 8048, Atlanta, GA 31106

Dr. Conrad Worrill Joins the Realm of the Ancestors

EDITOR’S NOTE: This comes from the National Black United Front (NBUF), the organization Dr. Worrill has led as founding member and National Chairman for many years.

Dr. Conrad Worrill of Chicago, Illinois founding member and National Chairman of the National Black United Front (NBUF) from 1985-2009 has made his transition to the realm of the Holy African Egun (Ancestors). Our thoughts and prayers are extended to his wife Mrs. Talibah Worrill, his children, his brother, his grand-children and large extended family.

Dr. Worrill’s contributions to NBUF are too numerous to fully account for. However, some efforts that stand out under his leadership include: The African Centered Education World Education Plan, We Charge Genocide Campaign against U.S. government, The Demand for Full & Complete Reparations, the Durban 400 delegation to the World Conference Against Racism and various political campaigns. Within NBUF some of us have been his contemporaries, some have been mentored directly by him, some he has served as surrogate father figure, for others he has been a sage elder and for all of us he has made a great impact on our lives. Travelling the Pan-African World he made us all proud representing NBUF.

As a scholar/activist Chairman Emeritus Dr. Worrill placed a meticulous focus on organizing African people, never too big to do the “little things” passing out flyers, setting up chairs and the like. While we believe in the collective, it is correct to say that more than other single people he is the reason NBUF has lasted for 41 years.

As a part of his ideological family we are assured that our ancestral realm is being fortified with his strong spirit, joining Baba Jitu Weusi, Momma Porter and so, so many others.

Conrad was our brother, he loved his biological family, he loved his ideological family, he loved his community and spent the majority of his life working for African people worldwide. He consistently made great contributions to the African Liberation Movement. He has begun his ancestral journey standing at the ready to assist us in death as he did in life when called upon.

As tributes pour in and rightfully so, we all know the best tribute to Dr. Worrill is to continue the work of African Liberation on all levels.

Updates will be provided as information becomes available.

Forward Ever, Backwards Never,
Kofi Taharka
National Chairperson
National Black United Front

PO Box 31544 Washington DC 20030
(202) 753 – 9671

Check out our Web site

Follow Us

     

 

George Floyd: We’ve Been Here Before

By now, we have all seen the images and the videos. We have read the articles. we have heard the analyses of the news reporters, the community activists and the politicians. Some of you have probably seen everything we’re about to recount in this post. We are certainly aware of the incident that sparked all the grief over the past week, despite the ongoing concerns about the Covid-19 Coronavirus. None of us have been able to escape the upheaval that has followed in the wake of the murder of George Floyd by four Minneapolis police officers, whose knees compressed his neck and torso for over nine minutes until he died, pleading for breathing room and calling for his deceased mother, cries that went callously unheeded by his killers in blue. Bystanders who pleaded with the officers to allow Floyd to breathe were similarly ignored.

Given the graphic nature of the scene, four armed police officers restraining a handcuffed man and essentially choking and suffocating him to death on camera, perhaps one should not be surprised at what happened less than two days later: Minneapolis erupted into chaos, with angry protests morphing into a sometimes-violent uprising that not only evoked the rebellions that followed the March 3, 1991 beating of Rodney King, but as they quickly spread from city to city across the United States (and finally to cities in Europe as well), brought back the spectre of the nationwide conflagrations that followed the April 4, 1968 assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. Some certainly saw the apocalyptic destruction of modern civilization as they declared the return of the urban riots of the Sixties; still others described the rebellions as the harbingers of a long-awaited people’s revolution, often promised but never fully delivered.

Uprisings that follow these atrocities often elicit confusion among the people. Why are they burning their own neighborhoods? Why do the police so often seem to be regarded as the enemy of the protesters? What are our political leaders doing about this? How will this bring about a new Utopia of truth and justice? Why aren’t more police officers arrested and convicted for killing us in cold blood? And how will we get out of this vicious cycle of complacency, shock, anger, despair, denial and complacency again?

THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY REACTS TO THE KILLING OF GEORGE FLOYD

The United Nations responded with an expression of outrage at Floyd’s killing, which has increasingly been described as a murder.  Michelle Bachelet, former president of Chile and current UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, released this statement:

United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner
UN Human Rights Chief urges “serious action” to halt US police killings of unarmed African Americans

GENEVA (28 May 2020) – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet on Thursday condemned the killing of George Floyd, an African American man whose death in police custody on Monday was captured on video and has led to serious ongoing protests in Minneapolis.

“This is the latest in a long line of killings of unarmed African Americans by US police officers and members of the public,” Bachelet said. “I am dismayed to have to add George Floyd’s name to that of Breonna Taylor, Eric Garner, Michael Brown and many other unarmed African Americans who have died over the years at the hands of the police — as well as people such as Ahmaud Arbery and Trayvon Martin who were killed by armed members of the public.”

“The US authorities must take serious action to stop such killings, and to ensure justice is done when they do occur. Procedures must change, prevention systems must be put in place, and above all police officers who resort to excessive use of force should be charged and convicted for the crimes committed.”

“I welcome the fact that the Federal authorities have announced that an investigation will be prioritized,” she said. “But in too many cases in the past, such investigations have led to killings being deemed justified on questionable grounds, or only being addressed by administrative measures.”

“The role that entrenched and pervasive racial discrimination plays in such deaths must also be fully examined, properly recognized and dealt with,” she added.
While saying she understood the anger unleashed by Floyd’s killing, Bachelet urged people in Minneapolis and elsewhere to protest peacefully.

“Violence and destruction of property won’t solve the problem of police brutality and enshrined discrimination,” she said. “I urge protestors to express their demands for justice peacefully, and I urge the police to take utmost care not enflame the current situation even more with any further use of excessive force.”

International Pan-Afrikan activists also responded to this latest atrocity, including writing letters of appeal directly to US president Donald J. Trump. Dr. Barryl Biekman, International Facilitator of the African Union African Diaspora Sixth Region of Europe, Tiye International and keynote speaker at the January 2015 launch of the United Nations International Decade of People of African Descent at the UN Headquarters in New York City, wrote a letter appealing to Trump’s sense of justice, diplomacy and statesmanship. That Trump possesses neither of these qualities did not deter her from making this appeal, though she may have known that a favorable and sincere response from Trump would be unlikely. Following is the text of her appeal.

Urgent Letter To The President of the United States of America
H.E. D.J.Trump
Regarding the Killing of Mr. George Floyd
May 30th, 2020
Dr. Barryl A. Biekman, Coordination & Monitoring Working Group UN International Decade People of African descent (The Netherlands)

Excellency,

Respectful greetings,

I hereby respectfully ask your attention to the following;

During an election year for the Presidency of the United States of America and the fight against the Covid-19 pandemic, I am hopeful that you will receive this letter, read it and respond to it with an assurance that new policies will be enacted so that such atrocities, such as what recently happened to Mr. George Floyd in Minneapolis will not be tolerated again.

I humbly approach you as the civil society speaker, elected by H.E. Sam K. Kutesa, President of the United Nations General assembly, to speak (https://app.box.com/s/8bg9s1t0ez9sgmmiar61k7wix97jv1h5) on behalf of the global civil society People of African descent during the launching of the International Decade for People of African descent (2015-2024) on December 10th, 2014 at the 69th session of the UN General Assembly.

This Decade is based on the UN Resolution 68/237 (https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Racism/IWG/session12/A.RES.68.237.pdf). The mission (https://www.un.org/en/observances/decade-people-african-descent/programme-activities) of the Decade is summarized in the title of the Decade namely: ‘Recognition, Justice and Development’. A title that includes the themes on which the Decade is addressed. The main objective is that:

– People of African descent around the world, in all regions and countries, experience the full enjoyment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, as recognised in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination as well as other relevant international and regional human rights instruments.

Regarding the killing of Mr. Floyd in Minneapolis, U.S., I would like to bring into memory my statement (https://app.box.com/s/4sgg9vpjvd95capjmribd36gxc4m6boy) during the launching of the Decade whereby I emphasized that: ”….When an African American man is strangled to death by the police on the streets of New York we the people of African descent feel the same that we cannot breathe”.

And this time more than ever the killing of Mr. Floyd has shocked the world, it has shocked all People of Good Will in the Netherlands. It has shocked members of the world wide African (diaspora) family.

Excellency, we are shocked!

This here: “…..We add our voices in solidarity with all those demonstrating to demand justice for the victims of racially based police brutality. This situation makes it clear that institutionalized racism is still alive and that the campaigns against all forms of multiple racism & racial profiling (These include Afrophobia, the specific term to define the forms of multiple racism against African people) as well as the symbolic & psychological violence situation in different countries must be intensified” is another statement that I speak out during the launching of the Decade.

In 2020, five years later of the International UN Decade, we are still experiencing the killing of defenseless ‘African American men’ by police. That means that the intention of my statement on the International UN Human Rights Day on December 10, 2014, and the request on behalf of the global civil society African family did not penetrate to the capillaries of the police system.

Let me reiterate my appeal that I have made towards the United Nations of which the United States of America is a member of:

”….On behalf of the world wide African diaspora families I invite all of you to join hands with us for the implementation of the Program of Activities in the spirit of “Recognition, Justice and Development.” Because this Decade requires the committed support and involvement of all international, regional, national, sectors of society, stakeholders and people of Good Will in the world “.

The invitation to make this “Reparation Decade” a great success was also addressed to the United States of America.

Excellency, President Trump,

I’m certain that you will do everything in your power to effect immediate policies that discourage such inhumane actions against African Americans and other minorities. In concrete terms I urge you to implement (city diplomacy) policies that will overhaul the police force to act as protectors of all citizens.

Thank you for your swift action to the urgent matter. I am certain we all want peace, stability and harmony. So George Floyd and his family too.

Respectfully,
Dr. Barry A. Biekman

PROMINENT US ACTIVISTS RAISE THEIR VOICES

North Carolina-based social justice and religious leader Rev. William Barber, who has been organizing a new Poor People’s Campaign on a national level for years, wrote a commentary that was featured in an article by Fisher Jack on the Web site of the Electronic Urban Report (EUR), Screams, Tears and Protests Are A Mourning for Our Democracy on June 1 (https://eurweb.com/2020/06/01/social-justice-leader-rev-barber-screams-tears-and-protests-are-a-mourning-for-our-democracy/):

America must listen to the protests in the streets if it is ever to heal the wounds caused by both police and police brutality, social justice leader Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II said as he delivered a pastoral letter on Pentecost Sunday.

“ … I want us to look at those crowds deeply in the street. Listen to them, hear them, see the diversity,” Barber said from Greenleaf Christian Church in Goldsboro, North Carolina, where he is the minister. “And remember that in our history, slavery was abolished, women did gain the right to vote, labor did win a 40-hour workweek and a minimum wage. The civil rights movement in the face of lynching … did expand the right to vote for African Americans.”

Sociopolitical Commentator Earl Ofari Hutchinson wrote a commentary for EUR, Many Hands Created the Frankenstein Monster Derek Chauvin (https://eurweb.com/2020/06/01/earl-ofari-hutchinso9n-many-hands-created-the-frankenstein-monster-derek-chauvin/).

SPORTS FIGURES SPEAK OUT

Fox News host Laura Ingraham’s condescending and disrespectful warning for NBA superstar LeBron James and other sports figures to “shut up and dribble” instead of speaking out against injustice seems to be (thankfully) falling on deaf ears. Gradually, athletes are speaking up. New Orleans Saints safety Malcolm Jenkins, long an advocate for the people’s rights especially in cases of police brutality and abuse, chided his team’s quarterback Drew Brees after Brees’ tone-deaf criticism of those who protested by taking a knee during the national anthem, as Jenkins and Colin Kaepernick have done. Players on other teams around the league began to join in the criticism, and former player and television analyst Shannon Sharpe even suggested Brees retire from football because of his remarks. Brees was forced to issue a clarification of his remarks and an apology to those anti-police brutality activists he might have offended (https://www.nbcsports.com/washington/ravens/shannon-sharpe-says-drew-brees-should-retire-after-anthem-comments).

Former player and star wide receiver Anquan Boldin, who played for the San Francisco 49ers, Arizona Cardinals and Baltimore Ravens (whom he helped win a Super Bowl in 2012), has been speaking out against police brutality and corruption ever since his cousin Corey Jones was killed in 2015 by a Florida police officer. Boldin has spoken to focus groups and Congressional panels about this, co-founded the Players’ Coalition with Jenkins to raise awareness about racial justice and social inequality, and he has come to the rescue again, as detailed in the commentary As George Floyd’s death sparks anger and hopelessness, Anquan Boldin urges us to fight system, by Mike Jones, June 2, 2020, USA TODAY.

… “Did I think it was going to be easy?” asked Boldin, who retired almost three years ago to devote himself fully to fighting social injustice.

“No. I’ve always been a fighter. In my neighborhood, if you didn’t fight, good luck! But that’s what we’re going to have to continue to do. Not some of us, all of us.”
(https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/columnist/mike-jones/2020/06/02/anquan-boldin-george-floyd-players-coalition-racial-injustice/5312217002/)

Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks Patrick Mahomes and Russell Wilson spoke out as well, and were profiled in the article Patrick Mahomes and Russell Wilson: Senseless murder, racism cannot continue, by Jori Epstein, June 1, 2020, USA TODAY
(https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2020/06/01/chiefs-patrick-mahomes-seahawks-russell-wilson-george-floyd-protests/5309716002/).

POLICE EXPRESSIONS OF REGRET AND SUPPORT DURING PROTESTS

While in several cities, there have been indications of increased cooperation between police and protesters, with the city of Seattle cancelling curfew on the night of Wednesday June 3, and with police officers and National Guard troops kneeling with protesters and in some cases marching with them, some police officials have taken more overt and official stands in solidarity with protesters and with victims of police brutality.

Houston police chief Art Acevedo walked with protesters and made several important and supportive speeches over the weekend of May 28-31 to the community in George Floyd’s hometown about their collective feelings of loss, the need for justice and the need to prevent opportunists from using his death to sow destruction.  Several links to this story follow:

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/houston-police-chief-art-acevedo-speech-transcript-amid-george-floyd-protests

https://www.channel3000.com/police-chief-absolutely-sorry-over-george-floyds-death-after-fiery-protests-prompt-calls-for-peace/

https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2020/05/31/blog-mayor-sylvester-turner-and-hpd-chief-art-acevedo-speak-local-pull-up-and-praise-event/

Minneapolis police chief Medaria Arradondo expressed regret over the responsibility felt by his own police department in creating the “deficit of hope” felt by many in the city (https://www.channel3000.com/police-chief-absolutely-sorry-over-george-floyds-death-after-fiery-protests-prompt-calls-for-peace/).

Santa Cruz police chief Andy Mills took part in several marches and protests against the brutality of his “brothers in blue”. Photos of him kneeling with Santa Cruz mayor Justin Cummings have made headlines. The pose is reminiscent of that taken by former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, whose own peaceful kneeling protests have led to his condemnation as a traitor by Trump and his unemployment in football for the last several years.

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/santa-cruz-mayor-police-chief-kneel-in-peaceful-protest/2300401/

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-06-02/santa-cruz-police-chief-kneeling-george-floyd-protest

https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2020/06/01/image-of-santa-cruz-police-chief-mayor-kneeling-packs-a-punch/

https://nypost.com/2020/05/31/santa-cruz-police-chief-kneels-with-peaceful-protesters/

https://patch.com/california/santacruz/santa-cruz-police-chief-kneels-alongside-peaceful-protesters

Are these expressions of regret and solidarity from a few police officers and chiefs indicative of some major change in attitude among law enforcement?  Certainly not.  In a more recent development, police in Buffalo, New York pushed a 75-year-old protester to the ground, where he hit his head and began bleeding from his ear.  Police officers did not stop to render aid to the man they pushed, and their official report claimed the man had tripped and fallen.  (At this writing, the man was in a local hospital in serious but stable condition.)  When the two officers directly involved in the incident were disciplined, 57 members of that unit resigned in protest … of the disciplinary action.  And other incidents of brutality by police have continued to occur in cities across the country even during the protests which were themselves sparked by an act of police brutality.

Also, just because police in places like Santa Cruz, Houston, Minneapolis, Seattle and Los Angeles have expressed contrition now, does not in any way guarantee that those same departments, and perhaps even some of the same officers, will not commit their own acts of brutality in the future (especially since Minneapolis, where Floyd was killed, remains with a rather abysmal record in the area of relations between the police and the public).  Such is the degree to which the public trust in police has been damaged.

TRUMP’S CHURCH STUNT

In the face of the often-angry and always assertive public protests, the condemnations of police brutality from commentators and athletes, and the political pressure that increases with each new revelation about the incident and the apparent callousness that was seen in the expression on Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin’s face as Floyd lay dying, the Trump administration, while admitting that the loss of Floyd’s life was a tragedy, seemed increasingly unrepentant, especially with regard to the degree to which Trump’s own bombast has contributed to the hyper-militarized “us vs. them” attitude of many police officers. Trump appeared motivated to use whatever visuals he could find to bolster his Nixonian “law-and-order president” image.

On Monday, June 1, one day after a fire had been set in the basement of historic Saint John’s Church near the White House, Trump dispatched federal police to disband a crowd of peaceful protesters in Lafayette Park in a surprise attack using flash-bang grenades and teargas, then led a small group that included Defense Secretary Mark Esper, Attorney General William Barr, White House national security adviser Robert O’Brien, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany and White House chief of staff Mark Meadows across the park to a spot in front of the church where he stood with a copy of the Bible in what was termed a “photo op” and a “stunt” by detractors, which included Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington Rev. Mariann Budde and presiding Bishop Michael Curry, both of whom excoriated Trump for using the church as a prop, a mere backdrop “for partisan political purposes.”

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/dc-episcopal-bishop-outraged-trump-church-visit-71011653?fbclid=IwAR3PzvLe-T3i4jEgFd9LkBZoWB-DzRVuRcbXODmgsTXLuxU_Pkuc1xqcxU8

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/religious-leaders-lawmakers-outraged-over-trump-church-visit-n1221876?cid=sm_npd_nn_fb_ma

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/bishop-budde-trump-church/2020/06/01/20ca70f8-a466-11ea-b619-3f9133bbb482_story.html

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/most-gop-senators-avoid-commenting-on-trump-s-church-visit-84245061843?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_ma

TRUMP AND HIS MINIONS TRY TO FLEX THEIR MUSCLES

As White House officials sought ways to employ the National Guard and local police of Washington DC (https://www.forbes.com/sites/lisettevoytko/2020/06/02/white-house-officials-asked-if-they-could-take-over-dcs-local-police/), other states, and even the US military (which would violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act), Trump himself openly considered invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807), a move which was momentarily opposed by Defense Secretary Mark Esper until pressure from Trump caused him to withdraw his objection.

McEnany on Insurrection Act: If Needed, President Trump Will Use It, Posted By Ian Schwartz, June 3, 2020 (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/06/03/mcenany_on_insurrection_act_if_needed_president_trump_will_use_it.html)

On June 3, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton (R), no stranger to controversial hard right-wing statements, called on Trump to engage the military to quell protests in an opinion piece in the New York Times, Send In The Troops (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/03/opinion/tom-cotton-protests-military.html). This led to much rancor at the Times, with several staffers warning that the column could put Black staff in danger (https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/news/new-york-times-staffers-react-with-fury-over-tom-cottons-send-in-the-troops-op-ed/ar-BB1509tJ).

THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW CATCHES UP TO THE LONG ARM OF THE LAW

The old saying goes, “Truth crushed to earth shall rise again .” When these crimes are committed in such brazen fashion, it seems silly for the perpetrators to believe that they will escape justice, or at least public exposure, for long. The names of the police officers who committed acts of brutality against unarmed civilians, especially those of Afrikan descent, are always announced as they go before a police disciplinary board or, in rarer cases, a criminal court. And the police departments for whom they worked are often exposed as hotbeds of police brutality and corruption.

As the four officers involved in the killing of George Floyd moved toward formal indictments by the Minnesota Attorney General, the troubles for the Minneapolis police force as a whole began to escalate on June 3, as the Minneapolis Public Schools severed their decades-long relationship with the police (https://m.startribune.com/minneapolis-public-schools-terminates-contract-with-police-department-over-george-floyd-s-death/570967942/).

In Atlanta Georgia, six Atlanta cops who participated in a violent tazing and arrest of college students during the protests there were arrested and charged, according to the Electronic Urban Report (EUR, https://eurweb.com/2020/06/03/six-atlanta-police-officers-charged-over-excessive-force-on-college-students-video/).

Back in Minneapolis, on June 3, Minnesota Attorney General and former Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison, who had been asked two days earlier by Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to take charge of the investigation of the killing of George Floyd, announced that former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin would be charged with second-degree murder as well as third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, and that the other three officers who participated in George Floyd’s arrest and murder, J. Alexander Kueng, Thomas K. Lane and Tou Thao, had been arrested and charged with aiding and abetting second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter. He acknowledged that the case would be a difficult one, but that the evidence supported the enhanced charges against the officers.

Attorney General Keith Ellison upgraded charges against officer who knelt on George Floyd’s neck; charged other 3 involved, by Stephen Montemayor and Chao Xiong, Minneapolis Star Tribune, June 4, 2020 (https://www.startribune.com/four-fired-mpls-officers-booked-charged-in-killing-of-george-floyd/570984872/)

As more evidence comes to light and activists make increased calls for the charges to be elevated even further to first degree murder (which would require prosecutors to prove premeditation and might create difficulties for securing a conviction), we can expect more developments regarding the legal case.

POLITICAL BLOWBACK?

Sooner or later, a political price is usually paid. Sometimes, it comes in the form of a public rebuke by a respected former political leader or a former member of the current administration. Former president George W. Bush (2001-2008) delivered a speech on June 2, stating that he and former First Lady Laura Bush were “anguished” by the brutal suffocation of George Floyd and “disturbed by the injustice and fear that suffocate our country,” called for the US to “end systemic racism”, “examine our tragic failures” and protect the right of people to protest. The speech has been called a “rare silent rebuke” of Trump and his behavior.
(https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2020/06/end-systemic-racism-bush-43-delivers-rare-silent-rebuke-to-trump-calls-for-law-enforcement-to-protect-protestors/)

Former Defense Secretary James Mattis continues to show that, despite his “Mad Dog” nickname, he was among the more level-headed members of Trump’s Cabinet. He delivered a blistering critique of Trump’s behavior, calling him “the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead, he tries to divide us.”

https://deadline.com/2020/06/donald-trump-james-mattis-george-floyd-racial-justice-1202950664/

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/03/read-mattis-statement-on-trumps-handling-of-nationwide-protests.html

Sometimes, the political price is manifested in plummeting approval ratings (though Trump has somehow managed to survive over the last three and a half years despite approval ratings that are, for all practical purposes, underwater).

But eventually, even poor performance such as this will be exposed and the opportunity will be presented for the people to punish such malfeasance at the ballot box. In Ferguson, Missouri, where Michael Brown was killed five years ago, the first Black and first woman mayor was elected in 65-year-old Ella Jones, as reported by the Web site of the Electronic Urban Report (EUR, https://eurweb.com/2020/06/03/ella-jones-elected-as-first-black-mayor-of-ferguson-missouri/).

Also, the existing political bodies eventually work up the power in numbers, or just the courage within their existing members, to take concrete action, though this often takes far too long. EUR also reported that the Congressional Black Caucus, under the direction of its current Chair, Congress Member Karen Bass (D-California), has announced it will “forcefully respond” to cases of police brutality (https://eurweb.com/2020/06/03/congressional-black-caucus-looks-to-forcefully-respond-to-police-brutality-crisis/).

In Los Angeles, in a move that drew opposition from police unions as well as right-wing commentator Rush Limbaugh, mayor Eric Garcetti announced a plan to cut the budget of the police department and divert those funds to programs to lift up marginalized communities and communities of color (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/los-angeles-police-department-budget-cuts-defund-lapd-eric-garcetti-press-conference-a9549001.html#gsc.tab=0):

Los Angeles to defund police department by $150m and instead invest in minority communities

Mayor Eric Garcetti says: ‘It is time to move our rhetoric towards action to end racism in our city’

Chris Riotta, New York

Los Angeles officials have proposed sweeping cuts to the city’s annual budget and police department while calling for that money to be invested in marginalized communities after nationwide protests over the death of George Floyd.

Mayor Eric Garcetti announced at a press conference on Wednesday night the city would “identify $250 million in cuts so we can invest in jobs, in health, in education and in healing” following demands from the Black Lives Matter movement and other activist groups to divest funding from the Los Angeles Police Department.

Those groups called for the city to implement a “People’s Budget” that would fund housing and environmental projects, as well as promote opportunities for people of colour, Los Angeles Magazine reported.

In announcing the budgetary cuts, the mayor added: “It is time to move our rhetoric towards action to end racism in our city.”

The announcement comes after Los Angeles City Council president Nury Martinez proposed cutting up to $150 million from the LAPD and reinvesting those funds into communities of colour.

Ms Martinez explained the proposed cuts in a statement that read in part: “If we are going to finally end the sin of racism and all of its illogical, dehumanizing and sometimes deadly consequences, including in our police department, then we have to provide real solutions for real people who need our assistance.”

Eileen Decker, president of the city’s police commission, confirmed at the press conference on Wednesday that her panel would seek to identify funds that could be divested from the LAPD.

The proposed cuts were seen as a response to days of protests throughout Los Angeles and across the country, with those participating in the marches demanding an end to police brutality and the disproportionate use of excessive force against people of colour.

Prior to the nationwide protests, Mr Garcetti proposed increasing the police department’s budget by seven percent. Under the previous budget proposals, the LAPD would receive nearly 54 percent of the city’s general fund while other departments faced major cuts.

The mayor said more details would come at a press conference on Thursday night about how the city would reinvest its funding, and that a new Civil and Human Rights Commission would begin meeting next week.

THE CALL FOR “REFORM”: GOING FROM THE WOLF BACK TO THE WOLF AGAIN

When the protests finally cool off and the analysts are done with their speculation, ultimately the question will have to be asked and answered, What do we do to prevent this from happening again, and again, and again? A number of ideas have already been proposed, and some even embarked upon, such as increasing community policing, instituting police review boards that are made up of civilians who are elected, and even partially defunding police departments as Los Angeles’ mayor Garcetti is proposing, though no one outside of “revolutionary activist” circles has so far proposed abolishing police departments altogether. In the end, in order for these atrocities to stop, there will at least need to be a fundamental change in the relationship between police and the communities they interact with. Even so, the danger is that the very entity that inspires so much distrust will be granted inordinate control over the process. What makes less and less sense with each incident is that for decades now many elected officials, media personalities (including reporters and talk show hosts) and community leaders want to try to deal with a long history of justifiable distrust of the police by turning back to those same police for direction on how to solve this issue. Malcolm X called that going from the wolf to the fox, or maybe more accurately, back to the wolf again. The police claim to wrack their brains wondering why they are not trusted while they continue the very behavior (including murder and covering for murderers) that provokes the distrust and rage in the first place. Add to that their slave-catcher historical origins and the fact that they behave this way everywhere in the world where we live, and it boggles the mind why they still haven’t figured this out despite their unprincipled self-interest as demonstrated by the behavior of the vast majority of their police unions, most prominently the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP).

If we ever establish a true Pan-Afrikan Cooperative Coalition and re-start the kind of local Community Town Hall Meetings where the members of the grassroots community can come together and craft their own ideas for solutions to the scourge of police brutality and misconduct (among other concerns), one thing we need to look at is how we can build our own community-based means of ensuring the security and civility of our neighborhoods, so we will be less dependent on police departments to provide the kind of strong but caring and principled security that they have in too many cases proven incapable of delivering. This may require more outreach to street organizations, some of whom have their own serious issues with respect to criminality and misbehavior, to try to mobilize them into becoming community benefactors.

LACK OF ORGANIZATION ALLOWS OPPORTUNISTS AND PROVOCATEURS TO INTERFERE

The other major issue is the degree to which the principled protest movement was, especially in the early days of the uprisings, misdirected from their mission of expressing righteous anger into committing acts of random mayhem and petty thievery. Every uprising seems to contain three distinct groups: the largest group being the real activists, community members and citizens who wish to directly and defiantly protest the latest atrocity by the police state; a smaller group of opportunists who take advantage of the presence of the masses of people and the cover of darkness to break into and loot businesses, sometimes the businesses of the people of the community themselves; and a third, even smaller group of provocateurs that has no specific social-justice agenda (they may, in fact, be opposed to the aims of the main group and see an opportunity to discredit their cause with some well-placed acts of mayhem, or have political aims entirely unrelated to the issue at hand) that is there simply to cause wanton destruction in the form of burning cars, buildings and barricades in the street. Some individuals may be motivated by a mixture of these objectives, and many of them are ready with explanations designed to justify their actions as “revolutionary work” or “fighting the power”, though the only “work” they are actually seen doing is setting fire to a building or loading a television into the trunk of a car.

Reports of White provocateurs, for example, who began vandalizing buildings including spray-painting “Black Lives Matter” and anti-police slogans on windows while invoking the names of George Floyd, Philando Castille, Sandra Bland, Breonna Taylor and other victims of police murder, have proliferated (https://atlantablackstar.com/2020/06/01/white-provocateurs-accused-of-disrupting-peaceful-george-floyd-protests-with-rioting-some-accused-of-giving-bricks-to-group-of-black-men/; https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/george-floyd-protests-hijacked-white-22116897), though the claims by the Trump administration that the amorphous anti-fascist group “Antifa”, which Trump seeks to label a domestic terror organization, was behind the mayhem have not thus far been supported by evidence.

The fact is that in any uprising such as this there are a number of groups that will come out of the woodwork, as opposed to those who have been working tirelessly to organize our community at the local level. In Baltimore, Maryland, for example, “veteran” organizations have proposed a variety of strategies for our people’s uplift for years and even decades, from the Pan-Afrikan Liberation Movement (PLM) to Our Victorious City (OVC, https://www.ourvictoriouscity.org/home) to Teaching Artists Institute (https://www.facebook.com/teachingartist/?epa=SEARCH_BOX) to Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle (LBS, https://lbsbaltimore.com/) to the Maryland Council Of Elders (MCOE, https://www.facebook.com/mcoe1958/?ref=br_rs; https://bmorechristnewschr.wixsite.com/marylandcouncilofeld) to the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC, http://www.srdcinternational.org) and many other SERIOUS organizations and activists, as opposed to those that just surfaced to take advantage of the publicity brought by our response to the latest attack against our community. There are so many different organizations with different strategies because we are beset on multiple fronts, and not just police brutality, which is on graphic display right now. We are also threatened by environmental racism, healthcare disparity, political instability, political imprisonment, mass incarceration, human trafficking, deprivation of education, food insecurity, demonization by media, entanglement in the courts, cultural manipulation & appropriation, political imprisonment, economic marginalization and much more. We are under attack on many levels and as many activists in Baltimore and elsewhere have said many times before, we must be able to respond on many levels. But those many levels must be organized. Disorganization, and insufficient organization, allows opportunists and provocateurs, many of whom seem to have come out of nowhere and who we may not have heard of, to turn a righteous uprising into an unprincipled riot that will only elicit a response of mass condemnation from major media and violent reprisals from right wing militias as well as the police state. We must coordinate our responses so the true revolutionaries, those who are ready to build rather than just destroy, can work hand-in-hand with grassroots activists, businesses that work for the Community and Black Media to ensure that any Black response to White racism remains under control of Black activists committed to the Community and to Ma’at. This is why we need a Cooperative Coalition, and not one that is slapped together as a reactive measure to deal with the latest attack on our communities, but planned, organized and built as a proactive measure that can lead to a standing Pan-Afrikan United Front to respond to crises when they arise and develop forward-thinking strategies to build and lift up the community for everyone’s benefit.

Building such a Coalition is never easy. The reality of so many organizations with different missions that sometimes seem mutually exclusive of each other is the reason why a Cooperative Coalition is important, and why I talk about “Spokes of the Wheel” so much. People can pick the battle, or “spoke”, that speaks to them, be it economic, cultural, media, grassroots, spiritual, science or something else. And the different “spokes” can, and must, interact with each other to make sure one “spoke” works constructively with the others, that one “spoke” doesn’t counteract or disrupt the activities of others, and that the activities of each of them are timed in a strategic way so everyone’s work has the greatest and most beneficial effect. Sometimes, I must wait for your plan so I don’t step on it (like in football when the long pass play waits for several runs by the fullback to bring the defense’s safeties closer to the line of scrimmage). Sometimes I must go first to “set the table” for you (like in baseball when a leadoff hitter gets on base so the cleanup batter can belt the 3-run or grand slam home run). But we must be more strategic so the different groups with their different strategies can see their work finally bearing fruit and bringing success and victory for our people. And there is a role for all of us here, except those provocateurs and opportunists who thrive on our confusion and ultimately use it to bring us all down and leave us running laps instead of actually moving forward and making progress for our people and the world.

 

Focus on Political Prisoner Jamil Al-Amin on George Jackson University Radio

The Wednesday, May 20, 2020 edition of George Jackson University Radio (https://www.blogtalkradio.com/georgejacksonradio/2020/05/14/) features the issue of Political Prisoners, specifically the case of Imam Jamil Al-Amin (formerly known as H. Rap Brown), who has been imprisoned in Atlanta since his questionable conviction for the killing of two Fulton County Sheriff’s deputies in 2000.  Guests on the show include cultural anthropologist Mama Tomiko in Hour One and attorney Bro. Kairi Al-Amin, the son of the Imam and leader of his father’s support committee, and atorney Bro. Najee Mujahid of the Imam Jamil Action Network, who speaks about the case as well as James Santos (also known as Otis Jackson), who confessed to the crime for which Imam Al-Amin was convicted, in Hour Two.

Hosts Bro. Bomani Uhuru Jihad Shakur and Bro.Bilal of George Jackson University posted this descriptive promo on Facebook:

“Free The Land ! Revolutionary Greetings ! Welcome to a special double broadcast on George Jackson University Radio . Where we make it our duty to influence the narrative regarding ourstorical struggle .Because we know “We Are Our Own Liberators “. This show will have two one hour programs . George Jackson University Radio is approximately 2 hours . Our broadcast is scheduled for Wednesday May the 20th, 2020 at 8 pm Eastern time (7 pm Central and 5 pm Pacific). During the first hour from 8-9 pm ,we will be talking to Mama Shine. She is a cultural anthropologist with a focus on systemic/institutional identities, culture of racism ,generational trauma ,and healing paradigms/models. She is also an advocate for the population of aging men and women incarcerated from anywhere from 30,40 ,50 ,or more years in prisons across the United States. The last hour from 9-10 pm will be politicking with Brother Kairi Freemyfather Al-Amin. Kairi is a man of many faces ,jack of all trades and wears various hats . He was born in Atlanta ,Georgia to his parents Attorney Karima and Imam Jamil Al-Amin. Brother Kairi is currently an attorney working tirelessly to free his dad Imam Jamil Al-Amin. Besides from his legal work, he is a Rapper that utilizes the craft to promote the release of his father in a profound message via story telling .Brother Al-Am in graduated in the Class of 2012 John Marshall Law School. He also is a Life Coach and Business Developer. … There a petition to get Imam Jamil Al-Amin a re-trial. It can be found on facebook, Instagram and other media platforms. Please sign the petition and free our Elder, who has put in so much work for the people. Free The Land!”

George Jackson University Radio is dedicated, according to its Web site, to “to the work and legacy of ‘The Dragon’ George L. Jackson.  All supporters, students, and laborers welcome to continue the legacy – carry it on!” 

Listen to Hour One here:

Listen to Hour Two here:

The Forked Tongue Files of COVID-19

With all the concern being expressed regarding the current COVID-19/Coronavirus outbreak, we have encountered the usual amount of rumors, unsubstantiated claims, conspiracy theories, misinterpretations and outright lies from public elected officials, from the general public, on social media and on the Internet. This has inspired us to release another edition of the Forked Tongue Files. Here, we will examine several of these claims and consider the validity (or lack thereof) of each.

1. Is a Full “Lockdown” or the Building of “Herd Immunity” the Best Way to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Most countries around the world have now resorted to a variation of a “full lockdown” of civil society to prevent the spread of COVID-19 infection from person to person, especially after the number of infections, hospital admissions and deaths began to skyrocket.

While the outbreak first gained worldwide attention after an alleged origin in so-called “wet markets” of exotic animals and produce in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, and it subsequently seemed to rage out-of-control in countries like China, Italy, and now the United States, the responses of several countries to the pandemic attracted attention for a variety of reasons. Of particular interest to us in this post are the responses of Singapore, who seemed to respond quickly to the virus; South Korea, where an initial outbreak was tamped down with a series of aggressive measures which may or may not be workable in the United States, and Sweden, whose more “laissez-faire” approach first garnered interest and some praise but may now be questioned as a recent surge in infections and deaths has occurred.

Singapore

The Organization for World Peace included an April 6 article by Naomi K. L. Wang, Can Singapore’s Response To Covid-19 Still Be An Example For The World? (https://theowp.org/can-singapores-response-to-covid-19-still-be-an-example-for-the-world/), which briefly describes the response of Singapore, using quarantines, extensive testing and tracing of people’s contacts, to keep the spread of the pandemic to a minimum. Coronavirus cases in Singapore were controlled for some time as a result, leading to expressions of praise from many world leaders. But as the disease has progressed worldwide and the resultant number of cases has increased even in Singapore, their strategy, though not in any way discredited, has been put to the test. Perhaps the strategy of Singapore will ultimately pass that test.

South Korea

The Daily Signal posted a report by Fred Lucas on March 27, 5 Things Americans Should Know About South Korea’s Handling of Coronavirus (https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/03/27/5-things-americans-should-know-about-south-koreas-handling-of-coronavirus/), which gave a brief description of that country’s handling of the outbreak, including increased surveillance and testing which may be difficult to implement in the United States due to civil-liberties concerns.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies published a March 27 report by Victor Cha and Dana Kim, A Timeline of South Korea’s Response to COVID-19 (https://www.csis.org/analysis/timeline-south-koreas-response-covid-19). Here is the introduction to that report, which can be read in full at the link above:

South Korea saw its first confirmed COVID-19 case on January 20. The rate of infection gradually moved to 30 by February 17. Then on February 18, media reports surfaced that a 61-year-old Korean woman tested positive for the virus in Daegu, South Korea’s third-largest city. Dubbed “Patient 31,” this particular case not only represented a critical point that led to the rapid transmission of the virus through the rest of Korean society. It also came to serve as a warning to the rest of the world by underscoring the grave consequences of failing to practice social distancing and self-isolation.

South Korea saw a steep spike of case numbers in the following weeks and reached its peak daily case count on February 29 – forty days after its first confirmed case on January 20 – with 909 new cases and up nearly 500 from the previous day. It became the second most infected country after China by early March. South Korea undertook a massive public and private sector effort to fashion a national response to the pandemic. Korea’s drive-through testing gained media attention around the world and was hailed as an ingenious measure to protect healthcare workers from exposure while providing expeditious results to prospective patients.

Now, two months after the first confirmed case, South Korea is commended for its efforts to contain the outbreak. Though the response was not without its flaws, the Korea case is distinct in several respects.

Early: An early and almost immediate response after the first case on January 20.
Speed: A premium on moving as quickly as possible in setting up a testing regime.
Transparency: Real-time and frequent information dissemination to the public.
Public-Private sector: Enlisting companies with needed resources in a private-public sector response.
National organization: Organized as a national effort rather than at the city, provincial, or local levels.

Through timely development and approval of a functioning diagnostic test, frequent dissemination of information and public resources, heightened border control, and meticulous contact mapping through patient questionnaires and GPS-based mobile applications, South Korea’s efforts to “flatten the curve” are seemingly working. While the United States outranked China on March 26, 2020 as the country with the highest number of infected patients with an upwards of 84,000 confirmed cases, Korea now sits tenth on the roster of nations with the highest numbers of coronavirus cases.

To document this trajectory of South Korea’s national response efforts against the spread of COVID-19, the CSIS Korea Chair created a timeline of events outlining policies and other measures implemented to date.

Sweden

An article on the Web site of the National Review, Has Sweden Found the Right Solution to the Coronavirus? by John Fund & Joel Hay, April 6, 2020 (https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/04/coronavirus-response-sweden-avoids-isolation-economic-ruin/) described Sweden’s initial strategy of a relaxed COVID-19 response, only requiring elders and people with underlying medical conditions to self-isolate, as “courageous” and implied that world leaders, including US president Donald Trump, who have criticized this approach, are shortsighted.

Unlike other countries, it has so far avoided both isolation and economic ruin.
If the COVID-19 pandemic tails off in a few weeks, months before the alarmists claim it will, they will probably pivot immediately and pat themselves on the back for the brilliant social-distancing controls that they imposed on the world. They will claim that their heroic recommendations averted total calamity. Unfortunately, they will be wrong; and Sweden, which has done almost no mandated social distancing, will probably prove them wrong. …

The problem with lockdowns is that “you tire the system out,” Anders Tegnell, Sweden’s chief epidemiologist, told the Guardian. “You can’t keep a lockdown going for months — it’s impossible.” He told Britain’s Daily Mail: “We can’t kill all our services. And unemployed people are a great threat to public health. It’s a factor you need to think about.”

If social isolation worked, wouldn’t Sweden, a Nordic country of 10.1 million people, be seeing the number of COVID-19 cases skyrocket into the tens of thousands, blowing past the numbers in Italy or New York City? As of today, there are 401 reported COVID-19 deaths in Sweden.

But an April 9, 2020 follow-up article from Time Magazine’s Mélissa Godin, Sweden’s Relaxed Approach to the Coronavirus Could Already Be Backfiring (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/swedens-relaxed-approach-to-the-coronavirus-could-already-be-backfiring/ar-BB12ohla?ocid=spartanntp), cast doubt on the efficacy of Sweden’s relatively relaxed approach:

Sweden has a relatively high case fatality rate: 7.68% of the Swedes who have tested positive for COVID-19 have then died of the virus. Neighboring countries, like Norway and Denmark, have case fatality rates of 1.46% and 3.85% respectively. (The U.S. case fatality rate is 3.21%.) While Sweden’s elevated case fatality rate could be a result of its low testing rates compared to its neighbors, experts say Sweden’s laissez-faire approach could also be to blame.

The Swedish government continues to advocate for relaxed measures. The Swedish Public Health Agency cautions citizens to cover their mouths when they cough or sneeze and wash hands regularly but does not call for lockdown measures. On March 11, the government cut down the size of permitted gatherings to 500, and only lowered that down to 50 on March 29. Other countries, like Germany and Australia, have prohibited gathering in groups larger than two. On Monday, Sweden declared that domestic flights would continue running, despite the risks domestic travel poses for spreading the disease.

2. Are 5G Cell Towers Connected to the CoronaVirus?

Several posts on Facebook have insisted that the real cause of the coronavirus pandemic is the proliferation of 5G (the 5th generation of wireless communication technology) cell phone towers. Despite the fact that these claims are made without providing any analysis of a causative link between 5G and coronavirus infection, authors of several of these posts not only insist that their theory is correct, but impugn the intelligence of any who question their conclusions. Even though epidemiologists have not publicly established a link between the electromagnetic energy of 5G and other wireless technology and the spread of infectious disease through bacteria or viruses, this tactic often has the desired effect of silencing critical analysis and debate about the issue and thus further fuels the rumor without needing to prove anything.

An April 9, 2020 article by James Temperton on the Web site of Wired (https://www.wired.com/story/the-rise-and-spread-of-a-5g-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory/), The Rise and Spread of a 5g Coronavirus Conspiracy Theory, details how a once-obscure theory from a doctor in Belgium gained adherents after his claims of a connection between 5G and coronavirus went, well, viral, and resulted in the burning of several 5G cell phone towers in the United Kingdom and, probably, elsewhere:

It started with one doctor. On January 22, Belgian newspaper Het Laatste Nieuws published an interview with Kris Van Kerckhoven, a general practitioner from Putte, near Antwerp. “5G is life-threatening, and no one knows it,” read the headline. One scientifically baseless claim in this article, published in a regional version of the paper’s print edition and since deleted from its website, sparked a conspiracy theory firestorm that has since torn through the internet and broken out into the real world, resulting in fires and threats. Van Kerckhoven didn’t just claim that 5G was dangerous: He also said it might be linked to coronavirus.

At the time, the outbreak was a comparative speck. It had claimed nine lives and infected 440 people, almost all of them in the Chinese city of Wuhan. Under the heading “Link met coronavirus?” the Het Laatste Nieuws journalist pointed out that since 2019 a number of 5G cell towers had been built around Wuhan. Could the two things be related? “I have not done a fact check,” Van Kerckhoven cautioned, before piling in. “But it may be a link with current events.” And so the fuse was lit.

Van Kerckhoven’s comments were quickly picked up by anti-5G campaigners in the Dutch-speaking world, with Facebook pages linking to and quoting from the article. Here, they claimed, was proof of something very dark indeed. Within days, the conspiracy theory had spread to dozens of English-language Facebook pages. But the conspiracy theory that Van Kerckhoven was peddling isn’t new. It has been bubbling away quietly for decades in unfounded concerns about high-voltage power lines in the 1980s to mobile phones in the 1990s. In coronavirus, such concerns had found a new hook.

We have read articles in the past that warned of possible side-effects of the then-new 4G communications technology. Those articles claimed that the signals emitted by 4G antennas may be disrupting the nervous systems if birds, butterflies and bees, which in turn could bring about a global collapse in the populations of the planet’s most important pollinators and lead to an environmental apocalypse. Other claims made the rounds about the possible neurological impacts on humans of 4G, and now 5G, signals. While these assertions have yet to be conclusively proven, they at least make some modicum of sense. That wireless signals would trigger the proliferation of a viral pathogen, however, have never been documented or proven, and don’t even make sense on a biological or epidemiological level. Until a causative relationship between 5G cell phone towers and COVID-19 infection can be substantiated, this claim only seems to be a distraction that can lead us to ignore the more obvious likely causes of the spread of a pandemic: physical contact or exchange of disease through breathing infected particles. Since the 5G claim seems to have been started by a Belgian doctor who incorrectly claimed Wuhan was the first location to use 5G towers (it was South Korea) and after only a handful of cases had even been reported (thus no statistically significant sample upon which to base any hypothesis), the spreading of this rumor with no evidence or documentation ranks with the “Black people are immune” assertion for lowering our collective vigilance and, in effect, helping lead our people to slaughter.

3. Do “Miracle Drugs” Work?

As the search for a treatment or a cure for coronavirus infection becomes more and more intense, attention is being focused on several drugs that have been promoted in one corner or another as possible cures. These medications have been touted often without thorough scientific studies or testing, and are sometimes based on hunches without any historical information or medical data to back up the claims. There are two prominent drugs that have received much of the attention.

Hydroxychloroquine

US president Donald Trump began to promote this drug during his press briefings in March, often mispronouncing the name as “Hydrochloroquine” or simply “Chloroquine”, a flub that resulted in tragedy when an Arizona couple swallowed tablets of chloroquine phosphate, used to disinfect fish tanks, thinking it was the same chemical. The husband fell gravely ill and died, while the wife was in critical condition in the hospital shortly thereafter, though she may thankfully be recovering. At one point she had reportedly admitted that she and her husband had heard Trump make reference to “chloroquine” and decided to try what they had on hand, perhaps reasoning, as Trump himself has said on several occasions, “what have we got to lose?”

For those who were listening more intently, hydroxychloroquine is a key ingredient in drugs that are taken to combat rheumatoid arthritis and related ailments. The drug is undergoing tests as you read this, but the side effects have not yet been studied to determine if the possible impact on heart rhythms, which can in rare cases be lethal, would constitute a sufficiently justifiable risk to make it a viable drug for COVID-19 patients.

Another complication comes from the occasional implications, proven or not, that Trump or members of his administration may be personally invested in drug companies that are attempting to establish hydroxychloroquine as the drug of choice for coronavirus patients. That, however, may be just another rumor.

Interferon Alpha 2B

This drug is profiled on the Web site Drugs.com (https://www.drugs.com/mtm/interferon-alfa-2b.html) and is described in slightly more descriptive terms on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interferon_alfa-2b). A March 17, 2020 Counterpunch article by Helen Yaffe, Cuba’s Contribution to Combatting COVID-19 (https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/03/17/cubas-contribution-to-combatting-covid-19/), also discusses how interferons work, as well as how the drug was developed in Cuba and California, late-Carter-administration consultations between Dr. Clark Lee of the US, a team of Cuban doctors and a laboratory in Finland, and how the Cubans used the drug to halt an outbreak of dengue fever, which sparked the development of the Biological Front in 1981 and the establishment of the Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) in 1986:

Since its first application to combat dengue fever, Cuba’s interferon has shown its efficacy and safety in the therapy of viral diseases including Hepatitis B and C, shingles, HIV-AIDS and dengue. Because it interferes with viral multiplication within cells, it has also been used in the treatment of different types of carcinomas. Time will tell if Interferon Alfa 2b proves to be the wonder drug as far as COVID-19 goes.

Telesur English published an article on March 17, Cuba’s Interferon Alpha 2B, Successful in Treating COVID-19 (https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Cubas-Interferon-Alpha-2B-Successful-in-Treating-COVID-19-20200317-0015.html):

In China, practically a few weeks after the beginning of the outbreak, people started to use Interferon in a way to avoid complications in people infected with the virus. According to Herrera, this molecule has “some side effects but not too critical.”

“The main idea of Interferon is just to avoid complications,” he told teleSUR. “Young people and people with a good immuno-response perhaps don’t need the medicine or people who won’t have complications and respond to the virus-like any other flu, but old people or people susceptible to have a bad immuno-response will have better chances of avoiding complications by using Interferon.”

He concluded that Cuba must participate in this solidarity movement with other nations, just “the same way other countries have had solidarity with Cuba, especially with Latin American and African countries.”

“We have more physicians working abroad than practically any other country in the world, not because we are exporting anything but simply because we want to participate in building a world with better health conditions and living conditions.”

Newsweek‘s Tom O’Connor wrote an article on March 24, 2020, Cuba Uses ‘Wonder Drug’ to Fight Coronavirus Around World Despite U.S. Sanctions (https://www.newsweek.com/cuba-drug-fight-coronavirus-us-sanctions-1493872):

The drug, called Interferon Alpha-2B Recombinant (IFNrec), is jointly developed by scientists from Cuba and China, where the coronavirus COVID-19 disease outbreak first emerged late last year. Already active in China since January, the Cuban Medical Brigades began deploying to dozens of nations, providing personnel and products such as its new anti-viral drug …

So far, while the Trump administration is concentrating on the development of hydroxychloroquine, it seems to be ignoring interferon alpha 2B, which appears to have more of a track record in treating a variety of diseases and is now being tried in China to treat coronavirus infections. This may be at least in part motivated by a desire to discredit anything developed and used by Cuba, as the US has resumed its efforts to isolate the island nation since the Trump administration took power in the US in 2017.

Still, this drug has not been subjected to the kinds of rigorous trials that would normally be held before officially declaring a drug safe to use. The apparent early successes of the drug in at least offering some treatment to coronavirus victims, however unverified they may be, and the dire circumstances of a global pandemic may justify moving forward before such trials are fully done, but it may still be premature to make a sweeping judgement of its efficacy before it is tested in controlled conditions by a worldwide cross-section of conscientious, thorough medical researchers and practitioners. It may indeed be a “wonder drug” that proves superior to remedies being researched and promoted by Western doctors, and it certainly deserves to be studied to ensure that is so. The apparent reluctance by US actors to even discuss it represents a prejudice against its Cuban promoters that may cost lives, but an honest study needs to be done.

4. Are Black People Immune to CoronaVirus?

In early to mid March, several videos and Facebook posts made the claim, in the absence of evidence, that “Black people were immune to the COVID-19 outbreak”. Not only did these reports either ignore or dismiss the reports of Afrikan Descendants from actor Idris Elba (including accusations that he was paid to report he had tested positive) to pro basketball players like Rudy Gobert and Kevin Durant having tested positive for coronavirus, not only did they ignore the recent death by coronavirus of Cameroonian Afrobeat/Afrojazz icon Manu Dibango, but they apparently also ignored the stories of everyday people of Afrikan descent who have become infected, suffered and even died from the disease.

A recent local tragic example was detailed in a story by Rachel DeSantis, 27-Year-Old Md. Grocery Store Worker Dies of Coronavirus: ‘Like a Hole in My Heart’ (https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/newsfeature/27-year-old-md-grocery-store-worker-dies-of-coronavirus-like-a-hole-in-my-heart/ar-BB12kwTJ?ocid=spartanntp) about 27-year-old Leilani Jordan , a grocery store clerk who continued to report to work to serve the seniors in her neighborhood until she fell ill.

A 27-year-old grocery store worker in Maryland who was devoted to helping people has died after contracting coronavirus, said her devastated family, who believe she was exposed to COVID-19 at work.

Leilani Jordan, whose mom Zenobia Shepherd lovingly referred to as “Butterfly,” was admitted to the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on March 26, Shepherd wrote on a GoFundMe page. She died on April 1, according to the Washington Post and Fox affiliate WTTG.

Leilani’s brother Cedrick Jordan told WTTG that his sister, who worked as a greeter at a Giant supermarket in Largo, had cerebral palsy, and was considered the family’s “miracle baby.”

He said her symptoms were initially mild, and he was confident that she’d make a full recovery even after she was taken to the hospital.

“It was so fast. And I speak to my sister every day. When she was admitted, she was challenged, she was struggling with her respiratory health, and I could tell,” he said. “But it did not seem as severe as what it ended up being. And it just escalated so fast.” …

[Ms. Shepherd] said Leilani was particularly sympathetic to elderly customers, and felt strongly about continuing to go to work to help them out.

“She said, ‘Mommy, I’m going to work because no one else is going to help the senior citizens get their groceries.’ She only stopped going to work when she could no longer breathe,” Shepherd, who did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment, told the Post. …

The supermarket’s website outlines various precautions they’ve taken to protect employees as well, including plastic face shields for all associates and plexiglass shields at cash registers, pharmacies and customer service desks.

Her brother Cedrick warns that coronavirus comes on strong, and quickly.

“Do not take this lightly. COVID-19, do not think it’s a façade or it’s a joke because it’s not,” he told WTTG. “It’s severe. Be safe. I lost my best friend. Please be safe.”

As of Wednesday morning, there were 4,371 cases and 104 deaths attributed to coronavirus in Maryland, according to The New York Times. The United States, meanwhile, had 397,754 cases and 12,956 deaths attributed to the virus.

Glen Burnie, Maryland radio station WFBR-AM 1590 featured an important show on the afternoon of Thursday, April 9 from Mama Tomiko and Baba Ty of Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign, this time focusing on the current situation of coronavirus and its impact, specifically, on Afrikan people. Guests were Dr. Patricia Newton, noted Afrikan-centered medical doctor and psychiatrist, who provided important clinical analysis, and a special guest who had personally endured the grueling process of recovering from the coronavirus illness after having at one time believed the claims by some online pundits that “Black people are immune to COVID-19.” We have secured permission to share the audio of that program on this site and it can be listened to here:

This is perhaps the most dangerous of the pieces of disinformation about COVID-19. The behavior of many younger people (attending spring break and beach parties, defying shelter-in-place orders and congregating in groups without protection) was an indication of their personal belief that the crisis would not touch them, that they were “bulletproof”. To foist the completely unproven theory on Afrikan people that we are somehow immune to this disease, with absolutely no scientific evidence to support such a claim, is not far removed from the old Biblical cliché of “leading the lambs to slaughter”.

5. Is the media simply out to “get” the Trump Administration?

Trump has waged an ongoing battle with the press from the beginning, railing against what he has long called the “fake news media” ever since the contention over the number of attendees at his inauguration. After Sean Spicer and Sarah Huckabee Sanders finally resigned from their respective posts as White House Press Secretary, Trump himself has given press briefs at the coronavirus press events, which have often spent as much time lauding the achievements of his administration and arguing with reporters as discussing the current status of the outbreak.

An April 9, 2020 article from the National Review, Pence Blocks Fauci, Birx from Appearing on CNN after Network Stops Airing Full White House Coronavirus Briefings by Zachary Evans, April 9, 2020 (https://www.nationalreview.com/news/pence-blocks-fauci-birx-from-appearing-on-cnn-after-network-stops-airing-full-white-house-coronavirus-briefings/), seems to highlight the ongoing struggle between the Trump administration and the so-called “fake news press”.

Vice President Mike Pence has blocked Drs. Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, as well as other top U.S. health officials, from appearing on CNN following the network’s decision to not air the White House coronavirus press briefings in full.

“When you guys cover the briefings with the health officials then you can expect them back on your air,” a spokesman for the vice president told CNN.
Trump and the White House Coronavirus Task Force, led by Pence, have been giving daily briefings to the press for several weeks after rising numbers of Americans have been infected. A CNN executive said that the network has sometimes cut away from the briefings after Trump speaks, and turns to a panel to fact-check the president. However, the network usually broadcasts only the president’s question-and-answer session.

Fauci and Birx regularly appear at the briefings to give updates on the status of the coronavirus epidemic within the U.S. Fauci has also appeared on CNN virtual townhalls on the coronavirus for the past five weeks, but will not be present this Thursday.

The New York Times, another outlet that has been a target of the Trump administration’s ire, stopped airing the briefings on its website entirely.
“We stopped doing that because they were like campaign rallies,” Elisabeth Bumiller, the paper’s Washington bureau chief, told the Washington Post. “The health experts often have interesting information, so we’re very interested in that, but the president himself often does not.”

This story was also reported by the Washington Examiner (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pences-office-blocks-coronavirus-officials-from-going-on-cnn-over-briefing-coverage). A subsequent story on the Web site of The Hill by J. Edward Moreno, Pence reverses position barring coronavirus task force members from appearing on CNN: report (https://thehill.com/homenews/media/492120-pence-reverses-position-barring-coronavirus-task-force-members-from-appearing), indicated a reversal of this position, as did a follow-up story from CNN, White House reverses position after blocking health officials from appearing on CNN by Oliver Darcy (https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/09/media/pence-office-tv-bookings-coronavirus/index.html).

6. Is All of this just a Hoax?

There seem to be several variations of this theory, depending on one’s perspective.
Is the alleged “hoax” being played to disadvantage the right-wing conservative movement, which sees itself as the true “voice of the people” (though mainly White people) and is represented, or so think certain corners of the working class White community, by the stubborn, anti-science, anti-globalist but strongly Eurocentric White supremacist current administration? Trump himself seemed to push this claim early in the outbreak as he spoke before one of the last public rallies he would hold before the pandemic finally became real to him. CNBC published the story Trump says the coronavirus is the Democrats’ ‘new hoax’, Fri, Feb 28 2020, Updated Sat, Feb 29 2020, by Thomas Franck (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/28/trump-says-the-coronavirus-is-the-democrats-new-hoax.html). Trump has since backed away from the “hoax” talk, but his critics who have noted his many unhelpful statements, especially early in the pandemic when he appeared to try to minimize its severity, and those who followed his early advice to their detriment are not likely to forget his misinformed remarks.

Or is the hoax being played on the “free thinkers” among the Afrikan-descendant community who see their anti-Black-orthodoxy and anti-elite attitudes as the real independent political force in the US? Among this group we find those who consider hospitals to be death traps and vaccines to be poisons, and that the reason why so many Afrikan-Descendants have died during the outbreak was their decision to go to the hospital rather than the combination of a pandemic and the structural inequalities in living conditions, employment and healthcare access that complicate all aspects of our susceptibility to and recovery from COVID-19 infection. There is much to be suspicious of regarding the safety of vaccines (see the next paragraph) and hospitals (many of us know of someone who apparently died in hospital under less-than-clear circumstances), but in the absence of advice from medical professionals we can trust, decisions we make will ultimately amount to playing the game of “Who Do You Believe”. The establishment of a Pan-Afrikan Scientific and Medical Commission, perhaps a slightly more “revolutionary Pan-Afrikan” version of the National Medical Association (http://www.nmanet.org/), the National Black Nurses Association, Inc. (http://www.nbna.org/), the Association of Black Women Physicians (http://www.blackwomenphysicians.org/) or the African American Health Professional Organization, could provide the community some important guidance in matters such as these.

Or, could the hoax be a roundabout attempt by nefarious forces to use what some see as a genetically-engineered bioweapon created in a lab to push the latest potentially-dangerous vaccine on an unsuspecting and historically-oppressed population? Afrika has been the theater for the development of vaccines in the past that have been either suspected or demonstrated to have subjected the people to detrimental health effects in the name of “science”. The current movement toward testing proposed vaccines for COVID-19 in Afrika has not gone unnoticed by Pan-Afrikan activists who will fight tooth and nail against efforts to turn the people of the Mother Continent into the West’s latest guinea pigs. One theory about the development of HIV was that simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) was transferred, either accidentally or intentionally, to humans in the vaccines for polio, which then mutated to the deadly human immunodeficiency virus we know today as the direct cause of AIDS. The US military is already known to have experimented with many biological pathogens in laboratories in places like Fort Detrick, Maryland to study their possible weaponization, from e. coli to anthrax to ricin to Ebola.

Resisting the Hype

We have attempted to discuss some of the more pervasive claims that have too often led our people down the garden path to their own destruction. We recognize that we ourselves are not immune to being deceived by what appears to be truth, and thus we recommend the concerned and curious reader to check out the links in this article, look for exceptions and counterpoints to what we have shared here, and make a conscientious, reasoned, thorough analysis and argument that may dispel even what we have presented above. There has been a lot of disinformation placed in social media, in the halls of government officials, in the offices of the corporate bosses and in parts of the mass media. This disinformation is sometimes motivated by the desire some people have to appear “smarter” than everyone else by possessing alleged information and wisdom others do not. Some of the purveyors of these rumors, errors and lies may truly be convinced of the truth of what they are saying and writing because they trust whatever sources provided them with the information. And still others may simply like to see the rabble of humanity scurry about in confused desperation as the world burns around them. If humanity is to survive this pandemic with minimal loss of life or disruption to global civil society, the disinformation must end, those who create or proliferate the disinformation must be stopped, and accurate, verifiable information must be made available to the people. For Afrikan people, we must find and consult those among our learned scholars and Elders who truly know the secrets of science and medicine, of technology and geopolitics, of epidemiology and ethics, and consult their wisdom rather than the motives of those who would have us all dancing wildly to their tune like crack-addicted marionettes. The confusion and panic brought on by the rumor mill, the lies and the unverified conspiracy theories is a violation of the people’s right to know and a violation of Ma’at.

To those of you who see yourselves among the group of political-spinners, self-promoting know-it-alls, rumor-spreaders and fear-mongers, stop it. Now.

Maryland-Area Pan-Afrikan and Community Organizations Respond to the COVID-19 Outbreak

One of the consequences of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) outbreak that may not have occurred to people is the impact it is having on the operations of activist groups, especially grassroots organizations. Rallies, Town Hall Meetings, teach-ins, lectures, celebrations and commemorations are not being held because by definition they involve assembling people together in large groups that will be packed relatively tightly together. Several states have postponed political primary elections, including those for the Democratic nomination for president. While many organizations are using this time for reorganization, study and preparation for the day when mass gatherings are again possible, some are making moves to adjust to the inability to gather people together in one space. Some of these organizations have announced their immediate plans, while others will likely do so in the near future. Here are just a few:

The MARYLAND COUNCIL OF ELDERS (MCOE) (https://www.facebook.com/mcoe1958/); (https://bmorechristnewschr.wixsite.com/marylandcouncilofeld) is making plans for their annual Afrikan Liberation Day (ALD) event. The event has been held on a national level, concentrated in Washington, DC, for over thirty years, led by the All-Afrikan People’s Revolutionary Party (A-APRP). The last two years, ALD has been commemorated in Baltimore, Maryland by the Maryland Council of Elders (MCOE), many of whose members are also affiliated with the A-APRP. Those events were mass gatherings in Harlem Park and Lafayette Park in West Baltimore, but the current COVID-19 outbreak has rendered that plan all but impossible, as the state of Maryland has banned groups of that size from meeting and city parks remain closed for mass gatherings. The MCOE does not plan to let that derail the effort to observe ALD, however, and plans are being made for a “virtual symposium”, a panel discussion which would be broadcast over the Web on the last Friday of May, and a “virtual rally” on the last Saturday. This year’s event is likely to be scheduled on May 29-30, but further details will be announced on this page as well as the MCOE Facebook page after they have worked out the details.

The FOOD, CLOTHING AND RESISTANCE COLLECTIVE (https://www.facebook.com/fcrcollective/) has been conducting “Feed The People” events at which collected food is donated to poor residents. The current outbreak has, of course, added complications to their important work. But their effort continues to feed hungry communities, especially the homeless. A recent project is a mutual aid and emergency relief fundraising drive (https://www.facebook.com/donate/201582851152373/2765153733540515/):

Food, Clothing & Resistance Collective – Maroon Movement is doing a mutual aid & emergency relief fundraising drive, and pop-up distributions, for anyone who may need some “extra assistance” to stock up food, toiletries and medical supplies in Baltimore during this still very early stage of an emerging pandemic (Covid-19), in the middle of another pandemic (Influenza).

Due to so many local closures and loss of income for some now, and many others possibly in the near future, we as usual want to do our part to help out those who are most vulnerable in our community. Please help us with a monetary donation or donation of canned, boxed or bagged food items, baby formula, produce, toiletries (including pampers) and over the counter medical supplies.

For more info, or to set up a scheduled drop off of items, or to volunteer please message us or email us at: maroonmovement@gmail.com.

Thank you for your solidarity!

Additional Donation links:
Paypal: fcrcollective@gmail.com
Cashapp: $Simaleerbg
Venmo: @Simaleerbg
Bandcamp: simalee.bandcamp.com

HOUSING OUR NEIGHBORS (HON) (https://www.facebook.com/HousingOurNeighbors/); (www.HONBaltimore.org), a Baltimore-area community organization founded November 30, 2012 that advocates on behalf of the city’s homeless populations, posted an alert on March 22:

📣CALL TO ACTION: People living on the street or in shelters are some of the most vulnerable during this pandemic. Baltimore City has yet to take any serious measures to protect it’s homeless population. Current Mayor’s Office guidance for our crowded shelters includes such things as “encourage clients to sleep head to toe to reduce the spread of COVID-19,” which is not an evidence based practice to reduce the spread of a highly contagious virus. This is appalling and shows a lack of bold leadership in light of this crisis.

Mayor Bernard C. “Jack” Young alone has the ability to release funds and IMMEDIATELY move people into hotels or housing as we ride out this pandemic. We urge you to call Mayor Young NOW and demand he do just this.

Mayor Young: 410-396-4900

*Update: Try calling during business hours, as this does not have a working voicemail. You can also send him an email at Mayor@BaltimoreCity.gov or fill out the form here: https://mayor.baltimorecity.gov/contact-mayor

**If you can, also call your Council Member and ask them to help address this: http://www.baltimorecitycouncil.com/council-members

Please share with your networks and ask them to call too.
#cvd19 #coronavirus #covid19 #cv19 #homeless #baltimore #housing #humanrights #dignity

In case you’re not familiar with HON, here is some information on them from their Facebook page:

Our Mission:
Housing Our Neighbors is a community group comprised of people experiencing homelessness, allies and advocates promoting the human right to housing. We are working to end homelessness in Baltimore City through access to permanent affordable housing for all.

We advance the right to housing through education, leadership development, direct actions, political advocacy, and grassroots community organizing. We practice consensus decision making and believe that every voice will be heard and respected.

Background:
Housing Our Neighbors started in November 2012 with a group of homeless neighbors, community activists, and students who worked together on National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week. We were inspired by the solidarity, demonstration, and dedication we experienced during the National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week- Baltimore Sleepout 2012. Following the sleep-out, we committed ourselves and invited others to attend weekly meetings, in order to establish a community of activists dedicated to awareness, advocacy and action to end homelessness in Baltimore.

Housing, nutrition, health care, education and a living wage are essential human rights. Housing Our Neighbors will see an end to homelessness in Baltimore City through policies and practices that respect everybody’s right to these core values.

To see more of our work, visit us at www.HONBaltimore.org

LEADERS OF A BEAUTIFUL STRUGGLE (LBS) (https://lbsbaltimore.com/) issued the following statement regarding their adherence to “social distancing” in an effort to prevent the spread of the virus, but maintaining their commitment to continue with their essential mission:

The UJIMA PEOPLES PROGRESS PARTY (UPP) (https://www.facebook.com/UPPMaryland/) has issued several statements during the COVID-19 outbreak, and has posted video discussions of the issues surrounding universal healthcare, the for-profit sick-care system and the marginalization of the efforts of nations like Cuba, which not only welcomed a United Kingdom cruise ship into its harbor to assist in treating several Covid-19-positive passengers according to an article on the Web site of The Independent (https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-cruise-cuba-trump-us-covid-19-a9407846.html?fbclid=IwAR1W9jQeyqqmbWrdn1REIA46UvnC3fsegeTaIY-5EPog2iW4AzFP3NoIMng), but has also pioneered the use of the drug Interferon Alpha-2b as a treatment. The success of Cuba’s efforts hasn’t been widely reported, and thus anti-Cuba critics will refuse to recognize them.

One of UPP’s recent posts reads as follows:

People outside the Black community often wonder why our folks are suspicious of U.S. health system information and advisories.

As we deal with COVID-19 worldwide, we need to listen to information from the CDC, state medical officials and personal physicians. We also need to use our common sense and remember that the U.S. ruling class has never valued the health of Black workers and poor people.

We have been under served and marginalized by the U.S. profit driven medical system. Our demand for Black community controlled and free universal healthcare for all centers our need as a nation and class to have power over our lives. Never again can large sectors of our people be misused as guinea pigs for medical experiments and treatments.

We stand for universal health care and community control of healthcare facilities.

We call for a single-payer-universal-health-care plan for all residents of Maryland. We call for the expanded access to holistic healthcare practitioners to provide more medical care options for residents. We call the empowerment of communities to have healthcare access that specifically serves the health needs of the residents of the local communities.

The COVID-19 national crisis is exposing all the fault lines in the facade of the American public health system.

CLLCTIVLY was established five years ago in an effort to develop a platform through which different organizations are able to cooperate with each other,  especially in the area of cooperatively pooling and sharing resources and energy. In many ways, CLLCTIVLY seeks to establish a spirit consistent with that of the Cooperative Coalition we have often discussed and sought to establish in the Baltimore, Maryland area (See the “Spokes of the Wheel” article elsewhere on this site) and of the more global Pan African Diaspora Union (PADU) which was pursued in 2011-2012 to unite Afrikan-centered organizations from across the United States and in Afrika, Europe, Central America, South America and the Caribbean. This is CLLCTIVLY’s statement explaining its founding:

In 2015 after the death of Freddie Gray, a coalition of grassroots activists and concerned citizens came together to form Baltimore United for Change. In the days following the Uprising we launched a skills bank to create an “on ramp” for concern community members that wanted to serve. Over 260 individuals and organizations answered the call.

Community organizations often work in silos, these silos lead to fragmentation, fragmentation leads to duplication, and duplication leads to wasted resources – time, talent and treasure. The first phase of our project (CLLCTIV ASSETS) will create an online asset map/directory of organizations in Greater Baltimore listed by neighborhood and area of concentration.

CLLCTIVLY is a hyper-local social change ecosystem using an asset-based framework to focus on racial equity, narrative change, and social connectedness.

Our mission is to end the fragmentation and duplication of programs, to learn from and about each other, and to be a resource for the Greater Baltimore community that seeks to find, fund and partner with Black social change organizations.

The organization released a statement on March 19 in support of their COVID-19 Response Survey, which they hope will assist them in better fulfilling their mission in this time of “social distancing”.

CLLCTIVLY and our partners recognize that COVID-19 and the necessary public health measures to address it will affect our community in many ways – in the weeks ahead and the months to come.

Please take a moment to fill out the survey at https://cllctivly.typeform.com/to/urbZ78?mc_cid=39acea2328&mc_eid=2cc3ee829e. Your input will help us better support one another as we chart new territory.

As more information comes to our attention about organizational responses to the COVID-19 outbreak, we will make it available to the Community through our Web site, as will the different organizations involved from their Web sites and Facebook pages.

Some Thoughts on Covid-19: A Brief Introduction, for those who need it

The onset of the Covid-19 or “Coronavirus” pandemic has shocked communities around the world. It has taken governments by surprise and provoked responses that have in several cases only served to make the situation worse in their effort to either deny the seriousness of the contagion or conceal their own negligence in the spread of the disease. Meanwhile, as citizens of the world’s affected countries struggle to make sense of the crisis, some have led themselves and others down the gardsen path of conspiracy theory, paranoia and xenophobia. The possibility that some of their suspicions may have merit does not change the fact that turning on one another is perhaps the worst response to what threatens to rival the 1918 flu pandemic in its potential to kill millions of people, perhaps due to misinformed and panicked reactions to what might otherwise be a manageable crisis.

While the time will come to point fingers at self-centered propagandists who sowed panic and at corrupt or incompetent politicians who failed to respond in a timely manner to the crisis or deceived themselves and the public about the seriousness of this contagion, the most important questions for many of us at this uncertain time are, What exactly is Covid-19 or the “Coronavirus”? What organizations are working on the ground to render assistance, provide information or advocate for struggling and marginalized communities? What do we need to know and do right now to protect ourselves and stay healthy, while the health care system seems to be in the process of being overwhelmed and political leaders seem unable to adequately respond to the situation?

We’ve often gotten initial information from Web sites like Wikipedia, primarily because the rather communal nature of the site (contributions from a variety of researchers and writers who share their information in a rather “open-source” fashion) seems to minimize corporate or political influence on the information, and their extensive use of footnotes indicates a degree of journalistic integrity in that shared information is not only researched (as opposed to being limited to the writer’s personal opinions), but is also shared so readers can check the sources. The following are excerpts from Wikipedia’s article on Coronavirus 2019 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus_disease_2019):

Coronavirus disease 2019
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Symptoms: Fever, cough, shortness of breath[6]
Complications: Pneumonia, ARDS, kidney failure
Prevention: Correct hand washing technique, cough etiquette, avoiding close contact with sick people or subclinical carriers

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease was first identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has since spread globally, resulting in the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. Common symptoms include fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Muscle pain, sputum production and sore throat are less common. While the majority of cases result in mild symptoms, some progress to severe pneumonia and multi-organ failure. The rate of deaths per number of diagnosed cases is on average 3.4%, ranging from 0.2% in those under 20, to approximately 15% in those over 80 years old.

The infection is typically spread from one person to another via respiratory droplets produced during coughing and sneezing. Time from exposure to onset of symptoms is generally between two and 14 days, with an average of five days. The standard method of diagnosis is by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) from a nasopharyngeal swab. The infection can also be diagnosed from a combination of symptoms, risk factors and a chest CT scan showing features of pneumonia.

Recommended measures to prevent infection include frequent hand washing, maintaining distance from others, and not touching one’s face. The use of masks is recommended for those who suspect they have the virus and their caregivers, but not the general public. There is no vaccine or specific antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Management involves treatment of symptoms, supportive care, isolation, and experimental measures.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak a pandemic and a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Evidence of local transmission of the disease has been found in many countries across all six WHO regions.

Although those infected with the virus may be asymptomatic, many develop flu-like symptoms including fever, cough, and shortness of breath. Less commonly, upper respiratory symptoms such as sneezing, runny nose, or sore throat may be seen. Gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea are seen in a minority of cases, and some of the initial cases in China presented with only cardiac symptoms, like chest tightness and palpitations. In some, the disease may progress to pneumonia, multi-organ failure, and death.

As is common with infections, there is a delay from when a person is infected with the virus to when they develop symptoms, known as the incubation period. The incubation period for COVID-19 is typically five to six days but may range from two to 14 days.

Mild cases typically recover within two weeks, while those with severe or critical disease may take three to six weeks to recover. Among those who have died, the time from symptom onset to death has ranged from two to eight weeks. …

Dr. Li Wenliang (right), a doctor at Central Hospital of Wuhan and one of the first to warn others about the disease, sadly contracted COVID-19 himself and later died.

The virus’ tragic real-world impact on “the people on the ground” was reported in a March 18, 2020 article by Kelly McLaughlin (https://news.yahoo.com/5-members-single-jersey-family-142749752.html) about a New Jersey family that contracted COVID-19 at a family gathering. When the article was written, two of the family members had died, and at least one other member succumbed to the disease shortly after the article was written.

An ABC News article by Erin Shumaker, Coronavirus map: Tracking the spread in the US and around the world (https://abcnews.go.com/Health/coronavirus-map-tracking-spread-us-world/story?id=69415591), appears to track the daily status of the COVID-19 outbreak across the United States. The article was initially written on March 18, 2020 and has been updated on a regular basis as the crisis develops.

Measures taken by World Governments, the United States Government and Local Governments in the US

In the early stages, several world leaders seemed to engage in a contest to see who could most effectively deny the seriousness of the outbreak until the contagion had gone nearly out-of-control. China had initially silenced Dr. Li Wenliang when he had tried to warn the public about the danger of the outbreak, even forcing him to sign a statement that he had overstated his claims before the contagion had become so serious that Dr. Li himself became infected and later died from COVID-19. In the United States, president Donald Trump had initially insisted that the virus would diminish by April and that Americans had nothing to worry about before the explosive spread of coronavirus diagnoses forced him to reverse his field and claim that the US was now “at war” with the virus and that he had always known this to be the case.

A number of administration officials have been placed in charge of the US response, largely under the leadership of vice president Mike Pence, and so far the steps taken have concentrated on economic measures to stem the damage to the stock market (to little effect) and the general economy (some of which may lend assistance to those whose jobs have been suspended and businesses closed due to the collapse of the personal-service sector). Trump’s remarks have included information on measures his administration has taken and will take, though they are sometimes better remembered for his occasional boasts of the “great job” he and his administration are doing and his arguments with members of the press, calling one reporter a “terrible journalist” and disparaging another’s question as “nasty”. While immunologist, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force Dr. Anthony Fauci has discussed certain important medical issues at these almost-daily press conferences, governors across the US have been increasingly asking for more, calling for emergency federal action to authorize the mobilization of the military to send critically-needed supplies to a hospital system that many fear is on the verge of collapse. Nurses and doctors have pleaded for protective gear while they have sometimes been advised to make their own or even use scarves and bandanas in place of tested and approved protective gowns, gloves and masks. And testing kits remain in short supply, so that the intensive testing regimen that was employed by Singapore and other nations that have more effectively handled the outbreak remains an impossibility in the US. Notably, /west Virginia was the last state to report a positive coronavirus test, but that was likely due to the lack of a clear testing procedure which made the effective diagnosis (and thus identification and treatment) of West Virginians who experienced symptoms impossible for some time.

The shortage of heavier hospital equipment is also a critical concern. US automakers have ceased production of cars and trucks and it has been proposed that they retool their factories to build respirators that will be needed in the event that the virus continues its spread, leading to pneumonia-like symptoms that will require patients to obtain assistance breathing. The state of Washington and its associated counties have purchased motel buildings to convert them to makeshift hospitals, and took over an athletic field to build a tent hospital there, likely inspired by the Chinese government’s erecting a full hospital on an empty lot in a matter of days as their response to the outbreak became more serious. This type of technological and industrial improvisation may become a critical part of a comprehensive response to the outbreak.

An increasing number of governors have instituted control measures to help prevent transmission of the virus between citizens. Maryland, California, Michigan, Washington State, Illinois, Florida and New York were among the first to institute practically everything short of curfews and martial law, closing restaurants, theaters and shopping malls, banning gatherings of more than fifty or even ten people, and urging citizens to regularly wash their hands or use hand sanitizers in an effort to kill germs that may include the Covid-19 virus and practice “social distancing”, maintaining a personal perimeter of at least six feet and keeping that distance from other persons.

Grocery and warehouse stores have responded to the initial frenzy of panic-buying that saw a run on toilet paper, hand sanitizer, bottled water and non-perishable goods by instituting limits on the numbers of specific items that could be purchased in any single visit. My personal experience was that hand sanitizer was the first item to go from the shelves. Less than a week later, friends were posting on Facebook photos of empty shelves that once stocked toilet paper. During the week of March 15-21, signs at the local Costco announced a limit of one item of fresh chicken (though by that time, the bin was empty anyway), fresh ground beef (also none to be found anyway) and frozen ground beef, and certainly other items as well. Grocery stores, fast food and other restaurants are making an effort to adjust to this situation by instituting free delivery of meals and grocery items so customers can shop while avoiding contact with others.

Meanwhile, the populace has apparently responded with a variety of attitudes from blissful ignorance (apparently believing Trump’s initial assertion that the outbreak would abate shortly, or that the worst effects of the contagion simply would not happen to them) to suspicion (those who believe that the outbreak is a hoax or an attempt to distract the population from a more nefarious agenda, which in turn causes them to question the seriousness of the infection) to near-panic (runs on the stores and hoarding of massive quantities of essential goods, coupled with fatalistic predictions of what is going to take place). Claims that Afrikan people were immune were circulated for a brief while, despite the reports of even famous celebrities such as actor Idris Elba, professional basketball star Kevin Durant and Afrobeat composer/musician Manu Dibango becoming infected, among others. Suspicions have been raised that Covid-19 is actually a biological weapon designed to target specific populations, but those claims have not been backed up with evidence, and the fact that the disease has struck people from practically all countries and races casts that theory in doubt. Somewhere in that range of reactions there are those who are staying informed, doing principled research to determine the nature of the disease and its possible origin, but in the meantime increasing their clear-eyed vigilance with regard to hygiene, avoiding unnecessary contact with others and making themselves and their environments as healthy and clean as possible.

One major casualty of the Covid-19 pandemic has been the social interactions that we all take for granted. Except for those few who continued to assemble in groups against all advice to attend Spring Break events, go to the beach in Florida or visit the cherry blossoms in Washington, DC, gatherings have been cancelled for fear of risking spreading the virus. Not only has this cast a pall over what would have been any number of family and community social gatherings, but it also has curtailed the activities of grassroots organizations that normally meet with community members as a fundamental part of their outreach to the people. The key is to serve the community by reaching out but to also serve the community by doing everything possible to maintain the people’s safety. Future posts will discuss the responses of some of the Pan-Afrikan and community organizations to the outbreak as they work to maintain their effectiveness in this trying time.