“Mothership” with Host Grandmother Walks On Water on Africa400, Wednesday, August 4, 2021

Africa400 features frequent guest and now alternating guest host Grandmother Walks On Water, as she presents Mothership for the Wednesday, August 4 show.

Grandmother Walks on Water, also known as Nata’aska Humminbird is of Choctaw, Creek, Cherokee and African Heritage.  She is also co-founder of Baltimore based Wombwork Productions which utilizes art, theatre, and cultural healing modalities to empower youth and community.

For the August 4 show, click below:

Africa400 is heard every Wednesday at 2:00 PM (Eastern Time, United States) on HANDRadio (https://handradio.org).  After the broadcast, the show can be heard on HANDRadio’s Podcasts Page, an update of this post and the Media Pages of KUUMBAReport (https://kuumbareport.com), KUUMBAEvents (https://kuumbaevents.com) and the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (https://srdcinternational.org).

The Ancestors’ Call: Glen Ford, Black Agenda Report

Groundbreaking Revolutionary Pan-Afrikan journalist, commentator, analyst, co-founder of The Black Commentator and founder of Black Agenda Report, Glen Ford, has passed on to the Honored Ancestors at the age of 71.  He and fellow Black Agenda Report columnist Bruce A. Dixon, who became an Ancestor in 2019, helped form the backbone of Black Agenda Report‘s no-holds-barred, straight-no-chaser analysis of White racism as well as the “Black Misleadership Class” as they relentlessly fought for the liberation and uplift of Afrikan People.  

Black Agenda Report columnist Margaret Kimberley announced that more details of his passing will be made available shortly, presumably on the Black Agenda Report Web site, https://blackagendareport.com.  Also, Bruce C. T. Wright wrote an appreciation for NewsOne, Glen Ford Dies: Black Agenda Report Founder, Veteran Journalist, Dead At 71 | NewsOne.  

“Fresh News From Africa” with Bro. Francois Ndengwe on Africa400, Wednesday, July 28, 2021

The Wednesday, July 28 edition of Africa400 features Special Guest Host Bro. Francois Ndengwe as he hosts his recurring report “Fresh News From Africa”.

François Ndengwe is editor of Hommes d’Afrique Magazine and Femmes d’Afrique Magazine. He is also Founder and President of African Advisory Board.

For the July 28 show, click below:

Africa400 broadcasts live every Wednesday at 2:00 PM (Eastern Time, United States) on HANDRadio (https://handradio.org).  After the broadcast, the show is available for listening on the HANDRadio Podcasts Page, an update of this post, and the Media Pages of KUUMBAReport (https://kuumbareport.com), KUUMBAEvents (https://kuumbaevents.com) and the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (https://srdcinternational.org).

AFRICA400
Wednesdays 2-3pm EST.
https://handradio.org/
https://kuumbareport.com/
https://srdcinternational.org/
webuyblack.com

Africa400 Calls for Assistance for School Girls in Okere Village, Uganda

On the Wednesday, July 21 edition of Africa400, show hosts Mama Tomiko and Baba Ty are calling for support for young girls at Okere Village in Uganda.

Okere City was profiled in the June 9 Africa400 show, as was described in this post as well as on our Media Page.

Despite the tremendous efforts of strong activists and leaders like Ojok Okello, founder and developer of the Okere Community Development Project in Okere City, Otuke District, Northern Uganda, who was profiled in the June 9 Africa400 show, it is still difficult for school children and the general population in Uganda to enjoy the things many of us take for granted.  Some specific points that are being stressed by the campaign:

  • 1 out of 10 African schoolgirls drop out due to a lack of menstrual products.
  • 30% of Ugandan girls drop out of school because of a lack of sanitary pads.
  • 80% of girls entering primary school will never complete their primary education for a variety of reasons.
  • 41% of Ugandans in general live on less than $1.90 a day.

Anyone who is interested in donating or purchasing sanitary pads, underwear or soap, or who want to assist in other ways, please CashApp $AFRICA400 or email africa400radio@gmail.com.

 

 

JUSTICE INITIATIVE on Visiting Afro-Cuba in 2014

EDITOR’S NOTE: This is the first of two articles published this past week (June 17 and 18) by Justice Initiative, a human-rights advocacy organization founded by Heather Gray.  We occasionally share commentaries and articles from Ms. Gray as she consistently comments on issues of the day.  With the current wave of protests in Cuba and the right-wing commentaries being offered by the mainstream press, we wish to share the following seven video clips from Ms. Gray’s June 2014 visit to Cuba, to provide some of the human side of Cuban life, as well as the Afrikan influence on much of Cuba’s culture.

by Heather Gray
Justice Initiative
July 17, 2021

In 2014 I was fortunate to visit Cuba, thanks to the leadership of Prexy Nesbitt in Chicago. While there, under the guidance of “Making the Road,” we focused on the African culture in Cuba which, of course, is profound.  Given the recent attention on Cuba, I decided to yet again send out my videos of the trip. They are below. Enjoy!!!

(1) Visiting Cuba in June 2014 – Part I

(2)  “Learning from Sara Daisy” – Part II 

(3)  “Art & Religion” Part III

(4) Cuban Ambassadors on Cuba’s Assistance to African Liberation – Part IV

(5)  Sara dancing – Part V

(6) Havana Farmer’s Market – June 2014 – Part VI

(7) Making the Road – African Dancing in Cuba – Part VII

 

 

 

from JUSTICE INITIATIVE: The US Blockade on Cuba Must End

BY BRANKO MARCETIC
Jacobin
July 17, 2021


Richard Nixon, then Dwight D. Eisenhower’s vice president, met with Cuba’s Fidel Castro on April 19, 1959, in Washington, DC.

For sixty years, the United States has aimed to strangle Cuba’s economy and inflict misery on the Cuban people. Blockades are methods of war – and it’s time for the war on Cuba to end.

“They always blame the United States,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said on the Senate floor this week. “The embargo, the first thing they blame, it’s the embargo. ‘The embargo is causing all this.'”

Not long after the UN General Assembly voted for the twenty-ninth straight year to condemn the six-decade-long US embargo on Cuba – a 184-2 vote that pitted only the US and Israeli governments against the rest of the entire world – the country has erupted in massive protests over widespread food and medicine shortages. A chorus of voices, ranging from Bernie Sanders and other congressional progressives to former Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, have blamed the conditions on the long-standing US policy, and called for it to be finally lifted.

Regime-change advocates like Rubio have pushed back against this. For them, the embargo is irrelevant to what’s now happening in the country, which they claim instead is a product of “six decades of suffering under totalitarian socialism and communism.” Predictably, their preferred response to the current protests doesn’t involve ending the policy.

But the reality is that the US “embargo” – or blockade, more accurately – was designed to exacerbate scarcity and encourage social unrest in Cuba. For decades, the blockade has strangled the country’s economy and deprived Cubans of access to essentials like medical supplies, its success at creating misery only intensifying with the fall of the Soviet Union, the coronavirus pandemic, and four years of “maximum pressure” under President Trump.

____________
The US blockade was designed to exacerbate scarcity and encourage social unrest in Cuba.
____________

As eighty House Democrats told Joe Biden at the start of this year, “with the stroke of a pen,” he could undo Trump’s actions and “assist struggling Cuban families and promote a more constructive approach by promptly returning to the Obama-Biden administration policy of engagement and normalization of relations.” But this obvious course of action is the very least Washington should do. The US blockade has been a generations-long undeclared economic war on Cuba, one that has consistently failed even on its own terms while inflicting enormous pain on ordinary Cubans.

The Undeclared War

The US blockade on Cuba has been a key part of Washington’s long-standing war on the country, launched shortly after Fidel Castro led a revolution overthrowing the country’s US-backed military dictatorship in 1959.

Things didn’t start out entirely hostile. The Eisenhower administration publicly took a cagey wait-and-see attitude toward the new government. Meeting with Castro for three and a half hours, then-vice president Richard Nixon advised him, according to a post-meeting memo, “that it was the responsibility of a leader not always to follow public opinion but to help to direct it in proper channels, not to give the people what they think they want at a time of emotional stress but to make them want what they ought to have.” With a tinge of regret, Nixon recounted that Castro’s “primary concern was with developing programs for economic progress.”

By September that year, as Castro restricted private ownership of agricultural land and prepared to nationalize foreign-owned industry, the US ambassador to the country expressed “our serious concern at the treatment being given American private interests in Cuba.” The next month, president Dwight Eisenhower approved a program backing anti-Castro elements – including Cuban exiles launching raids on the country and, later, US-supplied sabotage and bombing campaigns – in the hopes that it would topple Castro and make him appear to have caused his own undoing.

____________
The US blockade has been a generations-long undeclared economic war on Cuba, one that has consistently failed even on its own terms while inflicting enormous pain on ordinary Cubans.
____________

By December, a CIA division head would advise that “thorough consideration be given to the elimination of Fidel Castro.”

The Cold War gave this US mission extra urgency. Eisenhower warned the Soviets in 1960 that his administration wouldn’t tolerate “the establishment of a regime dominated by international communism in the Western hemisphere,” in line with long-standing Washington doctrine that the US government would intervene in countries in the hemisphere if they ran counter to US interests.

Hoping to stop the spread of “Castroism” and end it in Cuba, Washington pressured other Latin American countries to cut off diplomatic ties, travel, and arms shipments to the country, threatening to suspend military aid and other penalties to those who didn’t comply, eventually twisting enough arms to expel Cuba from the Organization of American States. After successfully pressuring European and Canadian banks to cancel and refuse loans to the Cuban government, what was termed a US “quarantine” of the country began in October 1960, barring all exports to Cuba, aside from food and medical supplies, and over the next few years adding all trade, imports, and even goods from third-party countries containing Cuban materials. By 1963, under John F. Kennedy, the blockade as we know it today was fully in place.

This was no small thing. A blockade – distinct from an embargo, by including imports and trying to coerce third-party countries – is a method of war that, under international law, is meant to only take place during armed conflict. It’s not for nothing that legal scholars have argued that the blockade of Cuba is a serious violation of international law, not least for the fact that it’s aimed explicitly at forcing a change in government. Even the US government’s own legal advisors determined in 1962 that it “could be regarded by Cuba and other Soviet bloc nations as an act of war.”

Just as Nixon would respond to the 1973 election of a socialist government in Chile by ordering the CIA to “make the economy scream,” US policymakers openly hoped impoverishing and starving the Cuban people would lead them to overthrow Castro. “Every possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of Cuba,” one State Department official wrote in 1960, in order “to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.” Eisenhower said it more plainly: “If they (the Cuban people) are hungry, they will throw Castro out.”

Tightening the Screws

As Cuba’s largest and closest trading partner, the United States produced an immediate impact on its economy when it ended trade. The share of Cuban exports going stateside plummeted from the more than 60 percent it stood at through the 1950s to less than 5 percent by 1961, while the roughly 70 percent of imports that entered the country from the United States by the end of the 1950s cratered at less than 4 percent. By 2018, a UN agency estimated the embargo had cost Cuba more than $130 billion over six decades, significant for a country whose average annual GDP is a mere fraction of that sum.

____________
Eisenhower said it more plainly: ‘If they (the Cuban people) are hungry, they will throw Castro out.’
____________

It was the Soviet bloc that kept Cuba’s economy afloat for decades, both through billions of annual subsidies and by filling the trade vacuum left by the United States, becoming responsible for 79 to 90 percent of Cuba’s overseas trade. From fuel, machinery, and parts, to fertilizers, pesticides, and even the fats used to make soaps, the resources that allowed life and the economy in Cuba to function normally flowed because of Cuba’s integration into a broader Communist camp.

The Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991 was the biggest of several shocks that hit the Cuban economy that decade, leaving it more vulnerable than ever to the US blockade. GDP nose-dived by 35 percent, while agricultural output and manufacturing capacity collapsed by 47 and 90 percent, respectively. Construction and passenger transportation plunged by more than 70 percent each, while food queues, hours of no running water, and blackouts became a regular part of life. With soap suddenly needing rationing, Cubans had to make do with four measly bars a year.

Smelling blood, US lawmakers moved in for the kill. When Cuban trade with US corporate subsidiaries sharply rose in the wake of the Soviet crack-up, US congress passed the Cuban Democracy Act the following year to bar the practice, over the objections of the European Community and other allies, leading to the cancellation of dozens of trade deals with the country. On top of this, the law banned the sale of food for the first time (later repealed, sort of) and created a licensing regime for medicine and medical equipment so onerous that it functionally served to end medical commerce with the country. US lawmakers, it seemed, had no problem with heavy-handed government interference in the private sector, so long as it was at the service of overthrowing a government they didn’t like.

The EU similarly objected to the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, which took authority for the blockade away from the president and gave it to Congress, all but cementing it into place. Besides making revolution a prerequisite for lifting it, it further discouraged foreign investment into Cuba by, for instance, denying US visas to representatives of firms doing business with confiscated US property. This, even though a year later US military and intelligence agencies determined that “Cuba does not pose a significant security threat to the United States or other countries in the region,” and the Pentagon concluded the same thing a year after that.

____________
The American Association for World Health concluded in 1997 that the blockade had ‘dramatically harmed the health and nutrition of large numbers of ordinary Cuban citizens’ and ’caused a significant rise in suffering – and even deaths – in Cuba.’
____________

The results, as you might imagine, were brutal. After a yearlong investigation, the American Association for World Health concluded in 1997 that the blockade had “dramatically harmed the health and nutrition of large numbers of ordinary Cuban citizens” and “caused a significant rise in suffering – and even deaths – in Cuba” through “critical shortages of even the most basic medicines and medical hardware.”

The report painted a chaotic picture: increased disease as a result of more untreated water and less soap; ambulances, other emergency services, and health care facilities unable to function properly thanks to power outages and a lack of resources like fuel; high rates of anemia, iron deficiency, and undernourishment, the latter of which affected 22 percent of the population at one point; and hundreds of medicines out of reach or only sometimes available, made all the worse by pharmaceutical megamergers. Little surprise that 1994 saw similar civil unrest in Cuba as we’re seeing now.

These conditions were celebrated by the right-wing Heritage Foundation that year. Describing with relish reports of mothers turning to sex work, families subsisting on one meal a day, and the return of diseases like malaria, it urged the US government to keep the blockade in place until Castro’s government collapsed and to deny him a “much-needed safety valve” by turning away Cuban refugees. It casually noted the policy would likely lead to more repression for the Cuban people and possibly end in “bloodshed, armed conflict, and chaos,” before concluding, with no trace of irony, that “the United States must not abandon the Cuban people by relaxing or lifting the trade embargo.”

So, when Marco Rubio says today that “food, medicine and gas shortages are sadly nothing new in Cuba,” he’s right: modern history’s longest blockade has ensured these problems have been going on for a long time.

Economic Sabotage

That Cuba weathered all this is a testament to the benefits of what’s possible with a government that takes an active role during crises and seeks to guarantee economic security. With belt-tightening inevitable, the government launched a program of “humanistic austerity,” with major cuts to the state sector but increased health care and social spending, and food, clothing, and other goods rationed to prioritize vulnerable groups like pregnant women and the elderly.

____________
The Heritage Foundation noted US policy would likely lead to more repression for the Cuban people and possibly end in ‘bloodshed, armed conflict, and chaos.’
____________

Yet such temporary measures have their limits, as we’re seeing now. While Cuba’s economy is certainly plagued by serious issues separate from US policy, the ills being felt most acutely are overwhelmingly driven by two factors: the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” strategy and the pandemic.

Over his four years in office, Trump signed more than two hundred directives aimed at making Cuba’s economy scream. He sharply restricted remittances (to one family member at a maximum of $1,000 per quarter) before effectively banning them outright. He also barred US travelers from carrying out any transactions with entities tied to the military and intelligence and security services, in practice an attack on both Cuba’s ability to draw foreign investment and its crucial tourism industry, given the heavy involvement of the military’s business conglomerate in, by one estimate, 60 percent of the economy. And he put sanctions on shipping companies and vessels transporting oil to Cuba from Venezuela, on top of an existing embargo on the country, which subsidized and supplied a third of Cuba’s oil consumption in 2019.

The impact was swift and clear. The targeting of Venezuela’s oil exports has led to more rationing of energy, shortages of personal hygiene products the government can’t afford while it buys fuel on the open market, and oxen replacing tractors on farms. Trump’s attacks on remittances led to the eventual closure of Western Union on the island, imperiling hundreds of thousands of Cuban families. And after an Obama-era uptick in tourism, Trump’s various restrictions on travel, including a 2019 cruise ban, saw tourist numbers drop for the first time in a decade, by 9.3 percent over 2018 to 2019, and nearly 20 percent over the year after that, with US visitors declining close to 70 percent.

On top of all this, the decline in both remittances and tourism deprived the country of key sources of hard currency. That’s caused the government’s further struggle in paying overseas creditors, hobbled its ability to import the 60 to 70 percent of its food supply it gets from overseas, and motivated its creation of the high-priced dollar stores that have been a core source of anger driving the current protests.

While it may be true the US blockade technically no longer applies to food nor prevents trade with other countries, Washington’s overlapping web of sanctions – by doing everything from depriving Cuba of oil and foreign-exchange currency to crippling its economy more generally and forcing tough trade-offs in overseas purchases – has effectively closed the door on both.

The Cuban state’s generous and long-term investment in health care and education means it was able to develop its own COVID vaccine – only to then face a shortage of syringes.

All of this would’ve been hard enough to navigate at the best of times. But in 2020, Cuba, like the rest of the world, saw its economy further devastated by the coronavirus pandemic that exacerbated every one of these problems: it brought tourism to a standstill, further strangled the entry of hard currency, worsened food shortages, and caused job losses that made Cubans ever more dependent on the foreign remittances Washington was determined to choke out. Over the year, the country saw its economy shrink 11 percent.

As the pandemic magnifies the devastation of the US blockade, the blockade has in turn made it harder for Cuba to handle the pandemic. In July 2020, a UN special rapporteur concluded the blockade was “obstructing humanitarian responses to help the country’s health-care system fight the COVID-19 pandemic.” Among other things, the blockade stopped medical aid and money transfers from overseas companies and humanitarian organizations, denied Cubans the ability to use Zoom, precluded the country’s purchase of ventilators, and caused a shortage of these and personal protective equipment (PPE), while blocking a donation of pandemic aid from China’s richest man.

Oxfam reports the blockade has had a “drastic effect on Cuba’s vaccine industry,” making it difficult to obtain the necessary raw materials. Even so, the state’s generous and long-term investment in health care and education means it was able to develop its own COVID vaccine – only to then face a shortage of syringes, the blockade making it difficult to buy them from manufacturers.

It’s the blockade, too, that has driven the pandemic’s resurgence on the island, a big driver of the current protests. The economic squeeze pushed a desperate Cuba to reopen the country to tourism in November, which, combined with shortages of PPE and a shortfall of 20 million syringes, led to a jump in cases. Still, it’s rich for the Rubios of the world to charge that “the regime’s disastrous COVID response is the predictable result of a corrupt government” as they beat the drums of regime change, when, even with Washington’s determined effort to sabotage Cuba’s pandemic recovery, its response – with 1,608 deaths as of July 12 – doesn’t even come close to the mass death of US citizens engineered by Rubio and his ilk during the pandemic.

____________
Over his four years in office, Trump signed more than two hundred directives aimed at making Cuba’s economy scream.
____________

Of course, none of this matters to Washington politicians who don’t think twice about casually starving and killing foreign people, whether by bombs or economic sanctions. But the irony is that the blockade has had a devastating effect on Cuba’s private sector, which is heavily dependent on tourism and on traveling to the US to buy materials. Nor is it particularly good for American industry either, with the blockade estimated to cost US businesses and farmers nearly $6 billion a year in export revenue.

Nor is it popular. For years, polling has shown a majority of Americans, even a fluctuating majority of Cuban Americans in South Florida, support ending the blockade, likely realizing that it’s both inhumane and, after nearly sixty years, ineffective.

Unfortunately, true to his Trump-lite approach to foreign policy, Biden has broken his campaign promises and is steadfastly continuing Trump’s Cuba policy, departing from the successful approach of the very Democratic administration he served in. Even as he “calls on the Cuban regime to hear their people and serve their needs,” Biden refuses to lift the Trump restrictions on remittances that more of those Cubans now depend on than ever.

Washington’s Handiwork

The unrest last week in Cuba cannot be fully understood outside the context of the blockade. None of this absolves the Cuban government over its repression of dissidents, or for the mistakes made in the course of the country’s economic management. But to put the stress on its “Soviet-style, centrally planned economy” and insufficient zeal in market reforms as the cause of the country’s economic woes, and not the more than half century of economic warfare waged by the world’s biggest power, is misleading to say the least.

Short of sadism and imperial hubris, there’s no good reason for the blockade to continue against a country that poses no threat to the United States, and which creates overwhelming misery for the ordinary people figures like Donald Trump and Joe Biden claim to stand with. And while removing it in full will be a heavy lift, requiring getting Congress on board, the president on his own could at least roll back the Trump policies he himself once acknowledged were an abominable failure.

Not doing anything will only drive home how hollow establishment lip service to human rights is.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Branko Marcetic is a Jacobin staff writer. He lives in Toronto, Canada.

Bridging the Gap Between Ourselves (Our African Connection)

EDITOR’S NOTE: The 2021 International Summit of the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC) will be held November 8-13 in Monrovia, Liberia.  SRDC will be advancing its outreach to the Mother Continent through concrete projects and programs with grassroots organizations on the ground there, starting with the effort to build Liberia’s first public library and sponsoring the 2021 Summit in cooperation with the Liberian grassroots organization Sehwah-Liberia.  The official announcement of the 2021 International Summit, with Registration Page and information regarding travel and accommodations for the Summit, will be made in the next week.  Meanwhile, we invite our readers to enjoy this brief history of some of the connections between Africa and the Diaspora, specifically as they relate to the Republic of Liberia, from Baba Kumasi Palmer, SRDC-South Carolina Facilitator.

Lott Cary

Daniel Coker

The Republic of Liberia was established as an independent nation state off the coast of West Africa in 1847 by freedmen from the United States. The first set of freedmen from the U.S. settled on Sherbo Island in modern day Sierra Leone in 1820. After a year of hardship at Sherbo Island the returnees moved on further along the coast landing at Providence Island in 1821 which is today known as Liberia. Lott Cary (1780-1828) and Daniel Coker (1780-1846) were the first group of pioneers that arrived in the newly formed colonies of Sierra Leone and Liberia, Coker being one of the founding members of the African Methodist Episcopal Church founded in Philadelphia in the year 1816.

It was through the aid and support of the American Colonization Society (formed in 1817) to send freed Blacks to the colony of Liberia. During this same period Freetown, Sierra Leone was established by the British (1808) as a colony that served

Paul Cuffee

as a refuge for enslaved Africans. Paul Cuffee (1759-1819), a freedman and owner of his own shipping vessel, was one of the earliest pioneers with the vision to repatriate freed Blacks from the United States to a new home in Sierra Leone. But it was Liberia that eventually became the new home for Repatriated Blacks from the US. This migration started by ship in 1820 and continued into the 1880’s.

The search for political, economic and physical security by Africans in the southern United States at the ending of Reconstruction created the condition for many Black families to seek refuge to Africa. Liberia was at the center of this migration and reconnection.

Henry McNeal Turner

Edward Wilmot Blyden

Edward Wilmot Blyden (1832-1912), Henry McNeal Turner (1834-1915) and Martin R Delany (1812-1883) were three prominent 19th century Black leaders at the forefront to reconnect the Diaspora to Africa by way of Liberia during and after the Emancipation Proclamation in the United States. Blyden was the foremost intellectual thinker and activist to advocate Diasporan Blacks to repatriate to Liberia. Blyden, the originator of the concept called “The African Personality”, was born in St. Thomas, Virgin Islands but migrated to Liberia in 1850. Turner, who made numerous trips to Africa, was born in Newberry, South Carolina and became the 12th bishop of the African Methodist Episcopal Church (A.M.E) in 1880. Delany was born in West Virginia and served in the Civil War, and was commissioned as a medical doctor with the rank of major.

Martin R Delany

The early repatriates to Liberia also emigrated from the West Indies islands of Barbados, the Virgin Islands and Jamaica. From the United States they came from the states of Virginia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Texas and Ohio.

We find cities in Liberia named after the states and towns where the early repatriates came and settled. Greenville, (Greenville-SC) and Maryland County (Maryland) are some of the names similar to names of US cities and states. Then there are cities named after families that emigrated from the Caribbean such as Barclayville, (president Barclay-born-Barbados-West Indies), Bensonville-(president Benson-born in Maryland-U.S.).

Joseph Jenkins Roberts

William R Tolbert Jr

All elected presidents of Liberia from 1848 until 1980 were born in the Diaspora or were the children of those born in the Diaspora. The first ten (10) presidents of Liberia were born in the Diaspora. Liberia’s first president, Joseph Jenkins Roberts (1848-1856), was born in Virginia. The grandfather of William Richard Tolbert Jr., the 20th president of Liberia (1975-1980), was born in Charleston, South Carolina.

Bridging the gap between Liberia and the Diaspora is a continued legacy established in the 19th Century by men and women who built the bridges for our Pan African connections. Many of those who left the United States for Liberia during the 19th Century embarked on ships docked at the Charleston Harbor located in South Carolina. Join us as we continue the journey of our pioneering ancestors who reconnected us over 200 years ago.

Our organization, The Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC), is presently working with our partner organization in Liberia (SEHWAH) to construct a public library in the capital city of Monrovia, Liberia. Books for nation building are welcome. Contact us at panafricanlibrary@gmail.com or our website: https://srdcinternational.org.

“Okere City; Building Community Owned Developments to Sustainable Cities” on Africa400, Wednesday, June 9, 2021

The Wednesday, June 9 edition of Africa400 covers the topic “Okere City; Building Community Owned Developments to Sustainable Cities”. Mama Tomiko and Baba Ty welcome Special Guest Ojok Okello, founder and developer of the Okere Community Development Project in Okere City, Otuke District, Northern Uganda.Ojok Okello earned a master’s degree in rural development and worked for international NGOs like War Child UK and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in England, He earned a second master’s at the London School of Economics.

He is co-founder of Refugee Innovation and Sustainable Enterprise – Urban Project (RISE-UP) and Team Leader at its adjunct initiative, RiseUp Hub, a social enterprise with the mission to expand economic opportunities for urban refugees in Uganda. Okello founded Okere City in 2019.

Okere Community Development Project (Okere City) is a community development and social enterprise providing a collaborative and holistic ecosystem to promote integrated rural development in Okere parish, Adwari sub-county, Otuke District, Northern Uganda. Okere City project seeks to be an enabler for the rural community in the parish to be more imaginative, cooperative, creative, innovative and enterprising as pre-requisites to make them more successful and be champions of rural poverty reduction.

Okere City has an ambitious plan to position Okere Shea Cooperative Society as one of the leading Shea producers in the world.

Okere City started an early childhood development center in 2019 with 50 children all taught in 1 classroom. The center has now grown into a fledged 3 tier center with 80 children in baby, middle and top classes.

The end of May 2020 brought the Okere City Project a new gift — the Okere City Community Health Centre. The facility will provide essential health services.

Listen to the June 9 show here:

Africa400 is broadcast live every Wednesday at 2:00 PM Eastern Time (United States) on HANDRadio (https://handradio.org). After the broadcast, the show can be listened to on HANDRadio’s Podcasts Page, in an updated version of this post and on the Media Pages of KUUMBAReport (https://kuumbareport.com), KUUMBAEvents (https://kuumbaevents.com) and the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (https://srdcinternational.org).

On Rashad Turner’s “Ugly Truth” Exposé of BLM and the Implications for Black Unity

Let’s start off with a declaration: While I do admire the exposure that Black Lives Matter (BLM) has put on the issue of police brutality across the United States, and while I do not feel BLM deserves much of the skepticism and discredit that many on the right and even the Revolutionary Left have heaped upon it, I also do not consider myself a hardcore “BLM supporter”.

I have my critiques of the organization and, occasionally, of its founders. I do not always agree with their strategy. My perspective is more Pan-Afrikan and, as such, calls for less of a “hands up don’t shoot” petitioner’s approach to the pursuit of social justice. I believe that a person’s sexual orientation is that person’s own business, and as such I do not keep a scorecard as to whether some or all of BLM’s core founders — Alicia Garza, April Tometti and Patrisse Cullors — consider themselves lesbians, queer, LGBTQ, or not. I do believe that a Black organization should consider itself Black first, and sexual orientation and gender identification should be separate from that Black organization’s list of central issues, particularly so that conflicts between the Black Agenda and the so-called “Gay Agenda” do not occur. I have my concerns about the recent financial allegations against Ms. Cullors and the degree to which they might indicate a betrayal of the grassroots revolutionary leftist principles that drew so many people to BLM’s aggressive in-your-face style of protest.

But I do believe the organization is involved in important work for social justice. I do believe that many of the discussions that are taking place today would not have occurred had it not been for BLM. I do believe that BLM has an important place in the overall Movement For Black Lives, as long as they can remain consistent with the core beliefs that brought them into existence. And I will not embrace some of the smear attacks against them that have been launched by right-wing ideologues, Web sites and media outlets just so I can flex my Revolutionary muscles, thumb my nose at Black elites or buck up my Straight Black Male Cred. There. I’ve made my declaration. Now on to the point of this article.

This is the full statement that was recently removed from BLM’s “What We Believe” page on their Website (https://blacklivesmatter.com/), according to a Fox News article (https://www.foxnews.com/media/black-lives-matter-disrupt-nuclear-family-website):

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

How did Fox News get away with distorting that statement (which they had included, in full, in their article) into a call to “disrupt” the “nuclear family structure” in its headlines? Did they know that most readers will stop at the headline and not read the full statement, or at least not think and comprehend what the statement actually says? Apparently they were counting on it, so as to build cynicism among the community based on a right-wing talking point.

This comes at the same time that Rashad Turner, the reported founder of BLM-St. Paul, published a video (“The Truth Revealed About BLM”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wncYj2xfV6A) that claims he learned an “ugly truth” about BLM’s commitment to Black education and the Black family, in which he repeated the misleading quote “We disrupt the nuclear family structure” and he also made this statement:

“I believed the organization stood for exactly what the name implies – Black lives do matter. However, after a year on the inside, I learned they had little concern for rebuilding Black families … And they cared even less about improving the quality of education for students in Minneapolis. That was made clear when they publicly denounced charter schools alongside the teachers’ union. … I was an insider in Black Lives Matter and I learned the ugly truth – the moratorium on charter schools does not support rebuilding the Black family. But it does create barriers to a better education for Black children.”

Fox News was quick to jump on this opportunity in a June 1 article by Sam Dorman, Former BLM leader sounds off on group’s ‘ugly truth’ (https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/former-blm-leader-sounds-off-on-group-s-ugly-truth/ar-AAKBbRK?ocid=msedgntp):

Turner’s video, published to YouTube last week, highlighted how the group’s website stated that it wanted to “disrupt the nuclear family structure.” …

“And they cared even less,” Turner added, “about improving the quality of education for students in Minneapolis. That was made clear when they publicly denounced charter schools alongside the teachers’ union.”

“I was an insider in Black Lives Matter and I learned the ugly truth – the moratorium on charter schools does not support rebuilding the Black family. But it does create barriers to a better education for Black children.”

Apparently, the video was published by “a Black-people-led organization TakeCharge, whose ideals reject critical race theory and woke culture, writes The Daily Wire.” (https://meaww.com/rashad-turner-blm-founder-quit-movement-insider-learned-ugly-truth-wanted-to-be-cop-take-charge)

The organization TakeCharge Minnesota (https://takechargemn.com/) states this on their main page:

TakeCharge is a new organization committed to countering the prevailing narrative in popular culture that America is structured to undermine the lives of black Americans. Kendall Qualls will lead TakeCharge with the objective to inspire and educate the black community and other minority groups in the Twin Cities to take charge of their own lives, the lives of the families and communities as citizens fully granted to them in the Constitution.

We acknowledge that racist people exist in the country, but explicitly reject the notion that the United States of America is a racist country. This is a subtle, but significant difference!

We also denounce the idea that the country is guilty of systemic racism, white privilege and abhor the concept of identity politics and the promotion of victimhood in minority communities.

Mr. Qualls has been a rather frequent guest on Fox News to discuss his criticism of BLM, Critical Race Theory and other initiatives that he believes wrongly depict the United States as a racist country. Mr. Turner, meanwhile, appears to have moved rather suddenly from a leader of BLM-style street protest against the system to an embrace of the more “conservative” (I actually consider that word a misnomer, but more on that in another commentary) approach of Black organizations like TakeCharge, seeking to establish their bona fides as good, patriotic Americans. His video, however, which is billed as some sort of “expose” of the corruption of BLM, smacks more of opportunism than simple political or philosophical difference.

If Mr. Turner no longer believes in BLM’s tactics and wants to follow a more “conservative” strategy centered on the nuclear family and charter schools, fine. If he wants to align himself with TakeCharge and the Minnesota Parent Union to accomplish goals that are more in line with his personal political beliefs, fine. If he wants more of a “family values” approach that rejects Critical Race Theory and “woke” politics, fine. But what was the point of publishing the video on the way out the BLM door if not to discredit the organization and curry favor with more “conservative” interests?

BLM, as well as a number of other progressive-minded activist organizations (including some that are BLM critics), oppose charter schools because they have been the harbingers of efforts to defund the public schools upon which so many poor students depend, and they push for increasing the funding for public schools and better pay for teachers instead. But “conservatives”, motivated by notions of competition among schools and a commitment to free-market Capitalist principles, have expended much political capital (pun intended) in branding progressive groups as Socialist and un-American. This goes for the opposition to charter schools as well as the teaching of Critical Race Theory and The 1619 Project (“They’re teaching children to hate America”).

Mr. Turner’s apparent uncritical support for charter schools, despite the issues many Afrikan-centered educators have faced in dealing with the boards that control the charter schools’ funding, and the questions concerning what effect the proliferation of charter schools was having on the educational prospects of those students who could not meet the requirements for admission into those charter schools, makes one wonder about the degree to which he may have been influenced by right-wing interests such as those who still dominate media outlets like Fox News. His willingness to readily interpret “disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement” as a plot to “disrupt the nuclear family structure” seems to indicate his tendency to accept that, as well as other, right-wing talking points.

It would appear that his onetime support for BLM, an organization birthed in the aftermath of multiple police killings of Black men, women and children, has now waned as he has found his own Western-influenced beliefs to be in conflict with several of BLM’s core beliefs (which he may have ignored earlier). This seems much more accurate than some sensationalized statement about the “ugly truth” about BLM, which again smacks of a right-wing propaganda hit job best suited for “shock jock” radio or QAnon message boards.

Mr. Turner, if you have always supported charter schools and the Western-imposed “requirement” of a nuclear family, then just say so. If you are a so-called “Black conservative” who only backed BLM because of its opposition to police brutality and have now soured on its other political beliefs, just say so. If you have issues with the sexual orientation of BLM’s leadership, just say so. If you consider co-founder Patrisse Cullors’ financial involvements, which apparently included the purchase of several homes, to be a betrayal of what you thought was a more revolutionary organizational ethos (or simple grassroots ethics), just say so. But your objection to their stance on charter schools and the image of the nuclear family, as though this was some sort of surprise, and this “ugly truth” sensationalism that seems to inform your comments, does not speak well of your commitment to leftist or grassroots activism.

As I stated above, this does not mean that I agree with everything in BLM’s platform or political orientation, or that I reject the work that Mr. Turner and groups like TakeCharge and the Minnesota Parent Union are doing for Black children. But I don’t have to. That’s not the point of organizing and building Black unity. If every activist, every organization or every person agreed on political strategy, there would be only one organization instead of the many thousands that exist today. My issue is less with Mr. Turner’s personal critique of BLM than it is with the way he has expressed it — the “ugly truth” video that really only served as a mask for his expression of “conservative” values that has gotten him some personal exposure and won him favor with right-wing media outlets. We don’t have to agree on everything, but we do need to stop trashing each other in public for our enemies’ entertainment.

As I have stated numerous times, if Black people are to rise up against the repression we continue to face in the United States and around the world, we will have to unify around a key set of core issues that we all hold in common. We will have to ditch our ideological rigidity, kick our personal beefs to the curb, swallow our egos, put our need to personally set every agenda to the side and sit down together to build a more effective resistance and establish a more just society for all of us. There is no room in such work for those of us who will run to the mass media of our oppressor to seek headlines through sensationalist accusations against each other. These are the types of behaviors that destabilize organizations, destroy coalitions and crush movements, often before they have begun to stand up on their own two feet, before they are even able to breathe.

These are critical times for Black people. Right-wing politicians in over 40 states are pushing hard to restrict our ability to vote. Racist attacks are increasing. Objections are being raised across the country to the teaching of America’s racist history, even as atrocities like the Tulsa Massacre and the Red Summer of 1919 are being exposed to many Americans for the first time after a century. White people are increasingly drawing battle lines among themselves over their willingness to support autocrats and marginalize “disadvantaged” communities. The post-COVID economy threatens to make all of that worse. And, as has been stated an untold number of times, “when America has a cold, Black America has pneumonia.” If we as People of Afrikan Descent are to prevent yet another Tulsa Massacre, or even worse, another Red Summer of 1919, we must do better among ourselves.

A-APRP African Liberation Day Observance Saturday, May 29

The Maryland Pan-Afrikan Community participates in the African Liberation Day activities of the All-African Peoples Revolutionary Party (A-APRP).

ALD, founded in 1958 by Dr. Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, is observed “to mark each year the onward progress of the liberation movement, and to symbolize the determination of the people of Africa to free themselves from foreign domination and exploitation.”  (African Liberation Day – All-African People’s Revolutionary Party (aaprp-intl.org))  ALD officially falls on May 25, though the original Africa Freedom Day was observed in April, and these days ALD is observed on the weekend before or after May 25. 

The Maryland Council of Elders is spearheading the coordination of the observance in the DMV (District of Columbia/Maryland-Virginia) area, with cooperation and support from a number of local Pan-Afrikan organizations:

  • Pan-African Community Action (PACA)
  • Black Alliance for Peace (BAP)
  • Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle (LBS)
  • Al-Awda (Palestinians Right to Return)
  • Ujima Peoples Progress Party (UPP)
  • Amilcar Cabral Ideological School Movement
  • Revolutionary Socialist League-Kenya
  • Fondasyon Mapau
  • Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC)
  • All-African Peoples Revolutionary Party (Host)

The online event will feature a virtual round-table discussion, “Spooks, Grunts & Pigs: Know The Enemy!”

The event is being held on Saturday, May 29 at 2 PM Eastern Time (United States), which will vary depending on your time zone:

  • Los Angeles, California: 11 AM
  • Chicago, Illinois: 1 PM
  • New York City: 2 PM
  • Washington, DC: 2 PM
  • Coordinated Universal Time (URC): 6 PM
  • South Africa: 8 PM
  • Nairobi, Kenya: 9 PM

To participate, visit the following link to connect to Zoom:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83310568246?pwd=Zm1iVjlnQ1JINm1zYjlTc1NKREgrdz09

Meeting ID: 833 1056 8246

Passcode: 663754

One tap mobile: +16465588656,,83310568246#,,,,*663754#US (New York)
                              +13017158592,,83310568246#,,,,*663754#US (Washington, DC)

Or watch on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AAPRP

For more information, contact the Maryland Council of Elders at marylandcounciloreldersbmore@gmail.com, or visit the Web sites https://africanliberationday.net or https://www.aaprp-intl.org.