Author Archives: kuumba@verizon.net

Militarization of U.S. Police Departments: Some History, by Justice Initiative

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
Martin Luther King, Jr

Heather Gray
June 2, 2020
Justice Initiative

Preface

Once again, with the recent tragic killing of Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd, young activists are wisely demonstrating throughout the United States demanding an end to this injustice, racism and white supremacy and of police violence.

Strange as it might seem, I began to learn more about the history of contemporary U.S. police violence while in the Philippines in 1989, which led me to better understand what we are experiencing regarding today’s scenario.

It is also likely that Donald Trump recently held a national call with governors of U.S. states to explore ways to take federal troops into the various states. The fact is, however, that the U.S. government is not allowed to send federal troops into the states at will, thanks to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 after the Civil War. “The purpose of the act… (was) to limit the powers of the Federal government in using its military personnel to enforce the state laws” (Posse Comitatus Act – Wikipedia).

Below is some history of the militarization of the U.S. police departments thanks to the early U.S. colonization of the Philippines and of the restraints of the federal government to militarize the states due to the Posse Comitatus Act.

JI Military Police 2: March 24, 2018 Atlanta “March for Our Lives in Atlanta”  (Photo: Heather Gray)

America’s Early Colonial History

In the 20th and 21rst centuries, U.S. policies around the world, both economically and militarily, have been questionable at best. U.S. violent international policies outside the Americas started with the Philippines in the beginning of the 20th century. These policies, more often incredibly violent, as mentioned, are coming back to haunt us. An example of this includes the U.S. international policy of “Low-Intensity Conflict” (LIC) related to the militarization of our domestic police forces.

After Philippine-American War (1899 to 1902), the U.S. launched LIC, at the beginning of the century in its Philippine colony, with the creation of the Philippine Constabulary. The Philippine Constabulary is, even today, a national police organization created principally to protect American and Filipino corporate and military elite interests. The legacy of this policy is that it now serves as a model for a militarized policing system in our 21rst century domestic American life.

I generally define the “elite” as neoconservative and neoliberal economic proponents along with their corporate capitalist supporters and colleagues.

The U.S. government and its elite tend to often try out policies internationally before introducing them into the U.S. and, as in the Philippines, the U.S. elite have always demonstrated their desire to control the American people. They certainly don’t want opposition to their policies or threats to their economic control, as we have consistently witnessed throughout the history of the U.S. Witness the FBI, the CIA, COINTELPRO, etc, and the assassination of many of our persuasive and profound leaders, such as Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and others.

Constraints on Militarization in the United States: Some History

I realize this is hard to believe, but often, the U.S. elite are constrained in implementing controlling policies in the U.S. domestic arena due to some laws that prevent this. They then will try to circumvent the restricting laws or attempt to overturn them altogether.  

Not long after the end of the Civil War (in 1865), the United States government sent federal troops to the South to enforce the policies of the post-war Reconstruction period:

The Reconstruction period addressed how the eleven seceding southern states would regain what the Constitution calls a “republican form of government” and be re-seated in Congress; it addressed the civil status of the former leaders of the Confederacy, and the Constitutional and legal status of freedmen, especially their civil rights and whether they should be given the right to vote. Intense controversy erupted throughout the South over these issues….Congress removed civilian governments in the South in 1867 and put the former Confederacy under the rule of the U.S. Army. The army conducted new elections in which the freed slaves could vote, while whites who had held leading positions under the Confederacy were temporarily denied the vote and were not permitted to run for office (Reconstruction – Wikipedia).

Needless to say, it is important to note, as referred to above, that many of the federal policies during the post Civil War Reconstruction Era were needed and appreciated regarding the rights of freed slaves. And it is also important to note, then, that what is critical regarding federal government intervention, as Trump is wanting, is the policies and/or political orientation of the federal government itself. If the orientation of the federal government is oppressive of the rights of all the people, then the last thing the majority of the people would want is federal troops coming into their states.

The Compromise of 1877: When, in 1877, there was a highly contested presidential election between Democractic candidate Samuel Tilden from New York and Republican candidate Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio, a compromise was generated between the southern ‘Democractic’ delegation and the northern ‘Republicans’. This became known as the “Compromise of 1877“, in which the south agreed to support the Hayes presidency in return for the removal of the federal troops from the South  (Compromise of 1877 – Wikipedia).

In other words, the southern elite wanted to once again have controlling interests over the freed slaves and everything else in the South without federal interference.

The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878: The compromise between the northern and southern political parties, then, led to Congress passing the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878. “The purpose of the act… (was) to limit the powers of the Federal government in using its military personnel to enforce the state laws” (Posse Comitatus Act – Wikipedia).

There are exceptions, however, to the Posse Comitatus Act. If a state chooses to violate its citizens’ rights under the constitution and/or federal laws, federal military troops can then be sent in. This was the case when President Eisenhower sent troops to Arkansas in 1957 to enforce the Supreme Court’s “Brown v Board of Education” decision to integrate American schools. Eisenhower, reluctantly, I might add, responded to the obstructive opposition by the arch segregationist, Arkansas Governor, Orval Faubus.

Military Police 3: U.S. Troops in Little Rock, Arkansas 1957 (History.com)

Since the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, therefore, the U.S. government has been constrained overall in the use of military force domestically in any of the U.S. states.

This constraint, though, has never been the case in U.S. international policies and, therefore, the U.S. has engaged in militarizing the domestic arenas of other countries that fall under the auspices of the U.S. empire or areas of interest (such as the Philippines, South American countries, the Middle East, etc.).

Low-Intensity Conflict (LIC) is a “Policing/Militarization of the U.S. Empire”

What is “Low-Intensity Conflict”? There are seemingly many definitions of the term. Regarding the impact of LIC on the U.S. personnel, however, I refer to it as “low-intensity” only for the U.S. military and/or the controlling elite. In other words, the U.S. military does not get its hands dirty nor is it violently impacted by LIC, but instead it trains others to do this insidious work. 

“Low Intensity Conflict” is simultaneously “high intensity” for those outside the U.S. who are victims of these U.S. international LIC policies. These victims are often under intimidating surveillance, sometimes suffer or are killed by summary execution, torture, displacement etc. by military or police in their own country who are often trained philosophically and militarily by the U.S.

In other words, LIC is a method employed to “police/militarize” the U.S. empire on behalf of U.S. political and economic interests. This could also be referred to as “war capitalism” (Beckert).

After the Philippine-American War, the Philippines became a colony of the United States. This was the first imperial venture by the United States outside its hemisphere and it set the tone for the 20th century policies in other countries including those in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. These other countries were not ‘colonies’ but are ‘countries’ the U.S. has had an interest in and/or has wanted to make sure the governments complied to U.S. trade policies or other economic interests.

In 1901, then, the U.S. created of the Philippine Constabulary (PC) to perform LIC policies and intimidate the existing Filipino revolutionaries. It is still in existence today. (Philippine Constabulary – Wikipilipinas)

It was created under the Commission Act No. 175 by Captain Henry T. Allen, an American, who was later dubbed as the “Father of the Philippine Constabulary”. It was first named as the Insular Constabulary and later renamed to Philippine Constabulary in December 1902.

The Constabulary was the first of the four service commands of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. It was a gendarmerie-type police force (armed police force or a militarized police force)  to replace the Spanish Guardia Civil (Spanish Civil Guard – Wikipedia).

The Constabulary was later integrated with the municipal police force, (to become the) Integrated National Police (and then) into the current “Philippine National Police” on January 29, 1991.

In layman’s terms, the militarized Philippine Constabulary has served in the interest of the U.S. and Filipino elite against the revolutionary movements in the Philippines that would, for example, choose to rid the country of its exploitative corporate and military ventures. At the very least, the revolutionary movements throughout Philippine history have attempted to end a government that relies so heavily on and adherence to the United States dictates. (Read the history of the Hukbalahap in the mid 20th century and/or the New Peoples Army (NPA), and about the National Democratic Front in the Philippines in the excellent book The Philippines Reader: A History of Colonialism, Neocolonialism, Dictatorship, and Resistance by Daniel Schirmer and Stephen Shalom).

Michael McClintock describes an example of the Constabulary military actions in the 1950s:

The combined army and Philippines Constabulary (PC) force level rose dramatically from 32,000 at the beginning of 1950 to 40,000 in 1951 and 56,000 in late 1952. Air power, too, became increasingly important as U.S. assistance stepped up, with some 2,600 bombing and strafing runs reported between I August 1950 and 30 June 1952 alone (some sorties allegedly with support from U. S. planes out of Clark Air Force Base). Requests for napalm were initially turned down on State Department advice, but from late 1951 American napalm was supplied and used both for crop destruction and antipersonnel purposes. A record system devised for Philippine military intelligence, which traced all known supporters of the wartime Huk resistance movement, was operational by the end of 1950; according to one source, it was used in screening operations that resulted in some 15,000 arrests in the first six months of 1951 (McClintock).

In other words, regarding the Philippine Constabulary, there is a fine distinction, if any, between what is “policing” and what is “military” operations.

On-Going U.S. International “Low-Intensity Conflict” Policies

When militarizing the domestic arena of its areas of influence in the world, the United States, as mentioned, pays no attention to its own domestic laws as a model that do not easily allow for this militarization in its own domestic sphere.

In fact, international LIC policies have been implemented by the United States throughout much of the 20th century. The Philippines is just one example. Regarding LIC in South America, we need to consider the U.S. School of the Americas (SOA) or what is now referred to as the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC). Founded in 1946, it is located in Fort Benning, Georgia. In this school, the United States trains the military of South American countries to serve a somewhat similar role as the Philippine Constabulary and/or even more violent and extreme, if that’s possible. Filipino army officers have also been trained at the SOA.

We could say that the WHINSEC in the U.S. is training the South American military to fight against their own people, as is true with the Philippine Constabulary.

So, instead of the United States military going into El Salvador, Nicaragua, Columbia, Argentina, etc. the U.S. trains troops from these countries to serve the interests of the United States and the friendly elite of the South American countries. Again, it is a “policing” or “militarization” of countries in what the United States considers its empire of interest.

The “School of the Americas Watch has a sizable listing of human rights violations committed by graduates of the SOA/WHINSEC.  In fact, the “School of the Americas Watch” is under the leadership of Father Roy Bourgeois who has for years wisely tried to close down this school.

One example, below, of these human rights violations is by the SOA graduate  General Juan Orlando Zeped from El Salvador who took a course at the SOA in 1975 on “Urban Counterinsurgency Ops”.; and in the 1969, the “Unnamed Course.” Below is some information about General Zeped’s tragic behavior:

Jesuit massacre, 1989: (Zeped) Planned the assassination of 6 Jesuit priests and covered-up the massacre, which also took the lives of the priests’ housekeeper and her teen-age daughter. (United Nations Truth Commission Report on El Salvador, 1993) Other war crimes, 1980’s: The Non-Governmental Human Rights Commission in El Salvador also cites Zepeda for involvement in 210 summary executions, 64 tortures, and 110 illegal detentions. (Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador) Member of the “La Tandona” and held the rank of colonel and served as the Vice Minister of Defense at the time of the massacre. Prior to the massacre he publicly accused the UCA of being the center of operations for the FMLN and was present for the meetings where orders were given for the massacre. He was later promoted to the rank of general (Notorious Grads – School of the Americas).

The Domestic Military: Contemporary Police Departments and Militarization

I have always assumed that the U.S. would also want to implement the LIC strategies domestically or have increased domestic militarization in the U.S. as well, that, as mentioned, the Posse-Comitatus Act has largely prevented. So, rather than sending in the U.S. military into the cities, one way the U.S. has managed to circumvent Posse-Comitatus is to “militarize” the local domestic police forces, which is now happening to a significant degree in the United States. It’s also another way to increase the huge U.S. military budget, as the domestic police departments are obtaining left over military equipment, as if that’s what we want or need in our cities!

In many ways, the militarization of police departments affords the opportunity for the police to “fight against” the American people rather then serve in the “interests” and “protection” of the American people. This is similar to the U.S. LIC trained military recruits in South America and elsewhere.  

In a 2014 article on Alternet, Art Kane states:

The “war on terror” has come home-and it’s wreaking havoc on innocent American lives. The culprit is the militarization of the police….

A recent New York Times article by Matt Apuzzo reported that in the Obama era, “police departments have received tens of thousands of machine guns; nearly 200,000 ammunition magazines; thousands of pieces of camouflage and night-vision equipment; and hundreds of silencers, armored cars and aircraft.”  The result is that police agencies around the nation possess military-grade equipment, turning officers who are supposed to fight crime and protect communities into what look like invading forces from an army. And military-style police raids have increased in recent years, with one count putting the number at 80,000 such raids last year (Kane).

Art Kane‘s “11 Shocking Facts About America’s Militarized Police Forces” are:

  1. It harms, and sometimes kills, innocent people.
  2. Children are impacted.
  3. The use of SWAT teams is unnecessary.
  4. The “war on terror” is fueling militarization.
  5. It’s a boon to contractor profits.
  6. Border militarization and police militarization go hand in hand.
  7. Police are cracking down on dissent.
  8. Asset forfeitures are funding police militarization.
  9. Dubious informants are used for raids.
  10. There’s been little debate and oversight.
  11. Communities of color bear the brunt.

Included in the concerns about militarized police forces should also be about information the training police officers receive altogether, as in attitudes and justice toward the other.

Kane provides an excellent narrative for each of the above facts.  I witnessed virtually all of these “11 shocking facts” in the Philippines in 1989. They are now, unfortunately, to be witnessed in the United States as well.

The unfair and disastrous “Low-Intensity Conflict” policies forced on many other parts of the world have come home to roost.

Summary

It is encouraging, however, that there is now significant organizing in the country against this trend of police militarization and gun violence overall. It needs to also be extended as well to the countries throughout the world that are continuing to be victims of these U.S. “Low-Intensity Conflict” policies. Closing down the School of the Americas would also be a good first start and implementing policies that do not allow for a militarization of our police departments would be another, and should be addressed with all deliberate speed. Many American police have also been trained in Israel and this should end altogether.

Americans also need to address the training American police departments are implementing with the domestic police recruits and police staff altogether. For example, how much of the low-intensity conflict model is being implemented. In other words, is the violence by the police used to service the corporate and elite interests in America? And further, is the training racist, biased, altogether encouraging discriminatory behavior and  the use of force by the police throughout the country.

When Martin Luther King said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” he was certainly correct by inferring that injustices conducted by the U.S. elsewhere will come home!

Gray & Associates, PO Box 8048, Atlanta, GA 31106

Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition Holds “Electoral Poly-Tricks” Town Hall in East Baltimore

On Saturday, October 12, 2024, the “Electoral Poly-Tricks” Pan Afrikan Community Town Hall Meeting was held at the Temple of New African Thought, located on 5525 Harford Road in East Baltimore. The purpose of the Town Hall was not to present a candidates’ forum where political hopefuls would subject us all to their political platforms and their long lists of promises of what they will do for our community; it was planned as a discussion among us as a community about what motivates us to participate, or not participate, on the electoral process and to make the voting decisions we make. We believe we succeeded in meeting that goal.

Sis. Tomiko, cultural anthropologist and founding director of Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign (APP-HRC), conducted the Libation to open the meeting. Bro. Cliff, Maryland Facilitator of the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC), member of the North America Regional Coordinating Committee of the Pan African Federalist Movement (PAFM) and Moderator of the Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (MPACC), then went over the meeting plan for the Town Hall and explained the history of the Pan Afrikan Town Hall Meetings from 2007 to the present, after which he and Sis. Tomiko introduced the Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (MPACC), the organizers of the Town Hall, and its cooperative coalition organizing strategy that includes the Seniors Advocacy Network, the Ubuntu Domestic Violence Collective and the Afrikan Women’s Defense Collective.

Bro. Cliff introduced the theme of the meeting: “Electoral Poly-Tricks”; proposed some questions to consider and assumptions we make as citizens when we go (or don’t go) to the polls. The aim of the Town Hall was to inspire the community to think when we go to the polls and to look ahead, after the elections, to build our own independent Pan Afrikan political infrastructure.

The Panelists present at the meeting were:

  • Bro. Everett Winchester, Minister of Information for Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities League (UNIA-ACL) globally and President of the Division 106 Barca-Clarke (named for General Hannibal Barca and Dr. John Henrik Clarke) in Baltimore
  • Bro. Nnamdi Lumumba, co-founder of Ujima Peoples Progress Party (UPP), which also is participating in the National Black Radical Political Convention (NBRPC), where he serves as Executive Secretary
  • Dr. Dennis Ausar Winkler, founder of Temple of New African Thought (TNAT) Holistic Wellness Center, race-based trauma expert, social scientist, scholar-activist, counselor, educator, professor and podcast host
  • Two more Panelists, Baba Khalid Raheem (New Afrikan Independence Party and National Black Radical Political Convention, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and Baba Charles Barron (former city council member and independent Pan Afrikan activist, also with the National Black Radical Political Congress, New York City, New York) would join the discussion later over Zoom.

The panelists begin by sharing their general views

Bro. Everett Winchester described the electoral process as “very difficult”. We look for what feels good to us, the “lesser of two evils”, but not what gets us power. We should know every elected official in our community so we can know who to pressure to ensure we get something in return for our vote. Other geographical jurisdictions and ethnic/racial communities get more from their candidates because they are better organized to wield power than we are.

Bro. Nnamdi Lumumba’s organization, UPP, is geared around de-mystifying politics and building power in the electoral arena. The purpose of politics is to make decisions, make policy and determine who gets resources. Elections have a particular part in this. We use ideas from Western Europe which doesn’t really have democracy (more like an advanced, refined version of feudalism) and from the United States which doesn’t have real democracy either, having built itself by enslaving and exploiting others, most specifically our ancestors and our Sisters and Brothers in Afrika and the Global South. The process of real democracy is working together cooperatively. Maurice Bishop’s Grenada pursued this goal before it was destabilized by US and other foreign intervention. In the United States, we only talk about democracy when we are told to vote every two, four or six years. The intent of elections is to wage a nonviolent struggle for control of the state, to replace the warlords’ historical ways of violence and bloodshed. Control of the state is important because it means control of the courts, the police and the legislatures that decide what resources get deployed for the people. We don’t look at it that way so we come across as beggars during election season.

Dr. Ausar Winkler noted that we only look at politics through the lens of electoral politics. Political statements are made everywhere, including our choice in clothes. We all believe we are doing the right thing, even those who are voting for Trump. There is the White Supremacist Republican Party and the White Feminist liberal party, the Democrats. The most radical you can be (without being punished) is what the White Feminists prescribe in the Democratic Party. We need to have more nuanced and sincere discussions, including “what is my body”. We also have to look at the man, woman and child and not get caught up in White Feminist attitudes.

Bro. Everett noted that the system was not meant for us; it was meant to keep us down. In a race for economic power, resources and education, Dr. Claud Anderson says we are in last place. We need to come together and start demanding things; until then, others are making decisions for us, including decisions that impact our Sisters and their bodies. The Honorable Marcus Mosiah Garvey said everywhere he went in the world, Black people were on the bottom, and Bro. Everett sees this today. This system was not meant for us, and we need to come together and fight for those things our people need.

Bro. Nnamdi started talking about some of the assumptions we make. We assume that we have to vote for one side of White Power and White Supremacy or the other; capitalism, theft of land, and exploitation of others are built into that choice. Winning power is not always the same as winning elections. Elections are held to determine control of the state. If we don’t have that available to us, winning power over our own local community becomes part of the struggle to win power over our lives. Putting leadership that is always ignored up front. Building power in the community between elections. We have to address and dismantle the assumptions that are built in.

Dr. Ausar noted that most Black men are not voting for Trump, despite what some in the media (and even our own community) like to claim. Most vote Democratic and are for reinstating Roe v. Wade, but the media makes it seem otherwise. Black men and Black women generally agree (both around 68%) in favor of Roe v. Wade. More White women than White men do. How do these issues show up in our houses, our living rooms? But we unfortunately tend to believe all types of things and don’t analyze the propaganda. Many of us don’t have time to read as much as we need to if we want to cut through the propaganda. We need to have more frequent, deeper, and more thoughtful conversations around these issues and we need to collectively make these decisions, including looking at why our Sisters even need to have abortions.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that Sisters are an extremely consistent and reliable voting bloc. And those who say Kamala Harris is not Black (a notion that was largely triggered by Trump’s claim at this summer’s National Association of Black Journalists convention that “she suddenly became Black”) are falling for the flim-flam and vicious lies propagated by White racists. “She is an Afrikan. She is an Afrikan. She is an Afrikan.” Whether she serves our interests or not is another discussion. And we cannot ignore the concerns of our Sisters. If we are going to talk about democracy, the majority (Sisters) must be heard. We cannot live in a world where half our intellect, labor and voices are ignored. We cannot allow White Supremacy to take half of our voice and labor. But this is nothing new. This has been done to us throughout history.

Bro. Everett, as the father and grandfather of Black women and girls, stated that we must make sure the Black Woman is nurtured correctly and is heard. Most teachers are women, and women tend to be better educated. Our problems should be discussed and solved together as Black Men and Black Women and not separated. Whatever his wife feels, that’s his opinion. Whatever we feel collectively is his vote. Mama Earth is the Lady President of UNIA-ACL Chapter 106 Barca-Clarke, which is reflective of this philosophy.

Dr. Ausar feels decisions regarding the man’s body as well as the woman’s should reflect the needs of the community if we’re going to get into regulating the woman’s reproduction by our community. Men’s reproductive behavior should be as regulated as women’s.

Community Comments and Interactive Discussion

There are people in our community who “fall through the cracks” and are still often not seen by the “phenomenal” organizations and hard-working activists in our community. The people in the cracks need to be better seen by the activists with all these organizations we have.

Bro. Everett said we need to create our own political entity. UNIA-ACL is more than just a flag. There is a government aspect. It’s there for all of us, hence the “Universal” part of the name. We can start to govern ourselves in our community.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that civics are no longer taught in schools. People in power take advantage of people who do not know. Introducing political education to our communities is an objective of UPP.

Dr. Ausar noted that we are indoctrinated into the system so we believe that what we learn in academia is the most revolutionary you can be. Henry Louis Gates noted going into the mainstream academic and political institutions with Afro combs and coming out eating caviar.

It was noted that protecting our families is more important than just the politics. One suggestion was to “take the woman off the market”, deny the services of our Black Women to the system. We all need to be in recovery because of the “isms” we have all been put through.

It was stated that government is important. Much of the support for Kamala Harris is primarily to prevent Trump from regaining the levers of power. The reason this country is not in rebellion (though it should be) is largely because Trump has been allowed to run for president when he really should be in prison.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that White Supremacy is in crisis. Kamala Harris is another chess move in this larger game between political action committees. We need to be in control of the candidates, the political action committees and the campaigns. In France, the right wing has denied their election. This is one example of how fascists are coming to power in response to White Supremacy’s crisis, trying to keep the power they have stolen. Trump’s plan was written in 2021 by a think tank. The ideas of Project 2025 are already being implemented in state capitals across the US. The plan is already written so he is only the icing on the cake. This is organized repression which must be met by organized resistance, which we largely lack because we are not truly organized.

Bro. Everett noted that we need to be honest about who we are as a collective. Harris says she has no specific agenda for Black people; if she says she does she will lose the White vote. Trump represents White Power and is unashamed to show it. Until we have someone who is from us and about us, ready to fight for us, our voice is muted.

Sis Tomiko mentioned the different political parties that are running (Green Party, Party of Socialism & Liberation, Libertarian Party, Dr. Cornel West’s independent campaign). Which ones should we look at?

Bro. Nnamdi said UPP has not endorsed any party, but the Party for Socialism and Liberation’s (PSL, with Claudia De La Cruz running for president) positions are interesting. The Green Party’s (Dr. Jill Stein as the presidential nominee) positions are well thought out, and the National Black Radical Political Convention, being held on October 26-27, has supported Dr. Cornel West’s efforts. You can also write in candidates; he has written in Mumia Abu-Jamal for president numerous times. If you have to hold your nose to vote, what does that do to your consciousness?

Bro. Everett noted that we are the First People, we are phenomenal. We need to go from asking for a piece of the pie to demanding the whole pie. In the Park Heights neighborhood, we see the Black side and the Jewish side that get different quality of services. We need the whole pie. We need to learn our history in our schools. We don’t learn about Garvey, we don’t control what we learn in our schools.

Building Our Own Black Agenda?

Bro. Nnamdi noted that even when we could not vote we had a level of organization and activity. Public school education came from Black Republicans way back when that was a progressive party. For the Jewish community, the ideological glue was often Zionism. Where is our ideological glue? Where is our ability to punish those who make decisions that go against us? National politics is so often out of our weight class.

Dr. Ausar acknowledged that we all want to see the best for our people. There are individual people in political positions that wish and mean us well. We often miss each other’s arguments though. Some of us are trying to survive under the status quo (things staying the same, wanting to make things better but not rock the boat too much to avoid repercussions) while others are speaking from a liberation framework about top-to-bottom revolutionary change. Some friends of ours who are in political positions want to do things and say things but are afraid to do so. Many of our people are suffering in deplorable conditions, more so than some Third World countries. What is going to liberate us? People working in the system too often call the revolutionaries insane, idiotic and crazy. People are beating up on third party politics. Dr. Ausar is all about third parties and wants to support them so they can reach 5% of the popular vote and gain some of the perks of reaching that status.

Baba Khalid Raheem greeted the meeting panel from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania over Zoom. Before the 1960’s we had just a handful of Black elected and appointed officials, less than 200. Now we have more than 2000, but one might think we still had only 200. The numbers have not equated to political power. We gave our political power to one of the two major parties. First we went to the Republican Party, but then they sold us out in the 1870’s in the Hayes-Tilden Compromise. Then they sold us out again in the Civil Rights era. Now we must develop our own independent political parties. Most of us are regular working-class people or working in the gig economy. We need to develop a political agenda and organization that represents our situation as a people, and stop just going along with the Democratic Party. We must break that culture and move to another level. The New Afrikan Independence Party and the National Black Radical Political Congress are important organizations he is working with.

It was stated that in Baltimore we have a closed primary system that limits the ability of independent political candidates and parties to win in elections. Most of the Afrikan organizations represent the tip of the spear but are out of touch with the largest voting constituency, Elder Black Women. Pan Afrikan activists need to get in touch with the grassroots community organizations. There is a Baltimore directory that lists the neighborhood organizations’ meeting dates. We also need independent freedom schools like what we once had with the Soul School Institute and the Timbuktu Center.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that the number of independent voters has grown every year, which is going to change the game. Primary elections are won by a minority of voters, and general elections are often run unopposed by the winner of the primary. We don’t seem to realize that the winner of the primary did not win the overall election, and we need better civics education so we can realize that and use that to our advantage.

The two-party system that controls Maryland’s politicians has a sitting governor and presidential candidate that are party to an ongoing genocide in Gaza, even making it illegal in some cases for businesses to boycott Israel. Cooperation Jackson (Jackson, Mississippi, founded by Ancestor Chokwe Lumumba and now supported in part by his son, Jackson mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba) has been responding to economic extraction and racism through three pillars: anti-imperialist political candidates, people’s assemblies where the community comes up with a collective people’s agenda and selects their representatives, putting economics behind politics and rejecting individualism (which would be nothing more than resorting to capitalism in blackface) in favor of cooperative economics. We can build something like that here.

Professors and scholars talking only to professors and scholars will miss the people in the cracks. These issues that impact us have been talked about for over 77 years at least, and some of us act as though this is something new. There is information about food distribution centers and other sources of community help that our activists and organizers have been unaware of or have even ignored.

Bro. Everett said that UNIA-ACL has reached out to numerous community organizations and last year held a Town Hall that invited community organizations. Earlier today, they participated in a community clean-up. Whenever we start moving as a community we should adopt a Race First consciousness. We need to start talking about what is impacting our community so we can invest, strategize and build together. If Kamala Harris is not doing anything for our community (a claim which has been disputed by others), that is on us for not putting the pressure on her to do for our community if she wants our support.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that Cooperation Jackson’s (Jackson, Mississippi) model is anti-capitalist and thus is different from, for example, Dr. Claud Anderson’s model. With regard to Pan Afrikan organizations reaching out (or not reaching out) to community groups, Bro. Nnamdi is also on the board of a local community organization, and connecting is hard. Pan Afrikan activists cannot just “stick and move”, visiting a community organization and then moving on to the next one; they have to “stick and stay”. They must be able to remain involved with those communities and be prepared to dig in with them.

Dr. Ausar urged us to remember that this work is exhausting. We become tired and it’s easy to start pointing fingers, and we must fight the urge to do that; most of us mean well. We are tired, and organizing is hard. We need to be able to re-charge our bodies, and we need to listen to each other and realize the ways in which we can get triggered when we are all talking at each other instead of talking to each other. We need to evolve our ideas so we don’t get confused by the Black capitalist agenda.

Sis. Tomiko noted that many of those in the meetings of activists and foundations on a larger scale are not Pan Afrikan activists but are people who work in foundations and have jobs with them. Often there are only a few real Pan Afrikan activists in these larger meetings.

Bro. Cliff noted that activists simply don’t have the people to be everywhere. He mentioned a meeting he had on behalf of the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC) about 15 years ago with the then-director of a local community organization umbrella group to try to reach all of the neighborhood organizations where people of Afrikan descent live. SRDC sought to reach out to the people in our community groups to get their involvement in building our own Pan Afrikan Agenda back then, so we could use it to build unity, pressure local politicians, develop self-help initiatives and take our grievances with the United States to international organizations like the African Union and United Nations. We did not know who all the organizations were and how to contact them, so meeting with this umbrella organization seemed to be a good place to start to get some direction and advice. The director told us to go talk to the Continental Africans instead of the Black community organizations, clearly not understanding what SRDC’s objectives were despite having been told. There are assumptions we make about each other and we judge each other prematurely, which stifles our efforts to move forward.

Baba Charles Barron, former New York City Councilman, joined the Zoom as a panelist. He came out of the Black Panther Party movement and ran for public office and beat the establishment Democratic machine that was backed by president Barack Obama, Congressmember Hakeem Jeffries and current New York mayor Eric Adams. He and his allies won city and state assembly seats. They overcame the Negro Democratic Party structure for 21 years. They established schools, secured the freedom of three political prisoners and brought economic programs to the community. They stopped gentrification, opposed landlords, pursued a reparations agenda and built a community center that the community will soon own. Mainstream Negro politicians, on the other hand, saw their neighborhoods gentrified. Now he is working with the National Black Radical Political Congress with Bro. Nnamdi and Baba Khallid. Revolution will happen from the bottom up, not the top down. He is backing the independent candidacy of Dr. Cornel West for US president.

Bro. Nnamdi stated that Baba Barron ran as a Democrat but built an independent infrastructure that took control from the mainstream Democrats. You can run as a Democrat if you are ready to build that independent infrastructure and take control from the Democratic Party on behalf of the people.

Mama Earth stated that we don’t have enough patience and compassion with one another. Many of us in our organizations are going through a lot ourselves and we can’t always run after all the other organizers and activists. Some of us don’t have enough time to handle all the responsibilities we have on the organizational as well as personal level. We need to come together and build with each other so we can do what we must do collectively without becoming overwhelmed. We can’t do it alone. We have to do it together in a united front.

Everyone has something going on in their organizational as well as personal lives. We can all do only so much by ourselves. If we center too much on ourselves, we run the risk of losing the “I Am Because We Are” perspective that is so important to our ability to move our people forward.

Kamala Harris, whatever our criticisms of her may be, is seen as vastly different from Donald Trump, who we already know is damaging to the country and world as well as to the already-destructive mindset of many of his followers. Until a revolution takes place, many of us will support Kamala Harris if for no other reason than to defeat Trump.

Bro. Nnamdi noted that Baba Charles Barron will be a participant in the NBRPC conference. Visit https://nbrpc.org for more information. Also, he understands and respects the support for Kamala Harris, but his refusal to support a political party that is participating in genocide should be respected also. The Biden-Harris administration is participating in the genocide of Gaza through its support of Israel, and he chooses not to support them. Although he was not here to tell anyone who they should vote for, he is guided by the conviction that “Afrikan people can live without imperialism.” We need to organize ourselves to make this happen.

Sis Tomiko stated that she heard an Indigenous activist on WPFW-FM (Washington, DC) state that a number of Indigenous activists were planning to sit this election out because they will not support genocide.

In answer to a question about obtaining agricultural visas for Black Farmers and Urban Farmers like in the Park Heights area of Baltimore, Bro. Everett noted that UNIA-ACL has agricultural gardens in Curacao and Liberia. The League of Nations acknowledged UNIA as a government on the days before it became the United Nations and had instituted a procedure where UNIA was a place to go to obtain visas until UNIA came under attack by the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) COINTELPRO.

An attendee on Zoom commented that we must get out of the Democrat-Republican mindset and build our own political base. “You are the ones doing the work.” We must stop inviting people from the outside that just want to talk about what they’re going to do but do nothing but represent the lobbyists and corporations that fund them. We must choose our own candidates and leaders. Baba Khalid Raheem invited them to join NAIP, UPP or NBRPC. In Pennsylvania, there are also closed primaries. The New Afrikan Independence Party has run candidates for mayor of Pittsburgh and for county council seats and got up to 12 percent of the vote, from people who were not in the New Afrikan Independence Party. Similar efforts have been undertaken elsewhere in the country. A Race First approach sounds good but we must be principled first, else we will be drawn to Black politicians who do not share a revolutionary Black perspective and could sell us out to our enemies.

The need for independent candidates was emphasized, and perhaps Bro. Nnamdi can take the lead here. We should put our money behind candidates who can meet our needs. Run for office like Baba Charles Barron did in Brooklyn.

Do We Have an Agenda of Our Own?

Bro. Everett commented that it must be an overall community-uplift objective. Resources, educational system and businesses need to be looked at, and a candidate or a party needs to look at these and include the community. Race First is about doing what will benefit our Afrikan family even if the supported candidate is not an Afrikan themselves. Other cultures move by looking out for their communities: Jewish, Asian, Latino. We must start looking out for each other. Vote for and support those things that are in our favor.

Bro. Nnamdi stated that we need to have an assembly to talk about what our agenda will look like, realizing that we are not monolithic and will have different ideas. We also need the infrastructure to make it happen and a democratic structure for our community to have a voice, and no room for an imperialistic agenda. Our existence will always be in peril as long as White Supremacy and imperialism are allowed to continue to exist.

Dr. Ausar noted that we must discuss in a sincere manner, and places like this must be healing spaces where we can have these conversations. We say we are the choir, but we’re not. We are the ones who actually need healing. We’re struggling and we don’t know how to get along with each other. If we don’t learn how to coexist and to disagree and debate in sincerity and love, we are in trouble. The whole “Kamala or not” argument is a case in point, assuming that no one here is going to vote for Trump. We can’t just see ourselves as the “special ones” going out to heal the community when we need healing ourselves.

Bro. Cliff made three points. (1) We need healing as Dr. Ausar said; he used now-Ancestor Mama Iyaluua Ferguson’s statement after Imam Jamil Al-Amin/H. Rap Brown was convicted and sentenced; “People say we’re preaching to the choir. If we’re a choir, we’re damn miserable. We were supposed to save him.” (2) We need to vote strategically, whether we vote for a third party to support it long term or vote for which candidate we are ready to fight for the next four years. People cried in joy when Obama was elected but got mad when he did things we could not stand, such as prosecuting whistleblowers, ignoring the World Conference Against Racism review sessions, increasing drone raids in Afghanistan and bombing Libya into the previous century, things he did because he was the president of the US and not just for us. No president is going to have an agenda just for us; whoever wins, we must be ready to fight, but we have failed to fight, either waiting for our hero to fix things or hiding from our enemy. We must organize between elections, not just every four years. (3) We need to build an independent Pan Afrikan political organization, a grassroots community council, and our own Pan Afrikan Agenda which will be regularly reviewed and updated to create a cooperative agenda, steps which we have refused to take so far. People in attendance here and on Zoom made important comments and they must be involved in building a cooperative, comprehensive Pan Afrikan Agenda that we all can embrace.

We will hold more of these Town Hall Meetings in the future, including sessions to build that cooperative, comprehensive Pan Afrikan agenda. We asked those in the chat and those in attendance here to provide their contact information so we can reach out to them and work on building from here.

UPP had copies of its official publication, The Progress Report, on sale on the back of the room. Also in the back, Diasporan Soul Kitchen was open for those who wanted to purchase some excellent, tasty and healthful food and drink.

We will provide updates to our ongoing efforts to build that Pan Afrikan Agenda. Watch this space for more information and insights on the US elections, which are presently upon us, and how we as Afrikan People can organize ourselves to weather whatever storms spring from the election results. Groups at the regional, national and Diaspora levels are making connections to try to build a broader, collective, cooperative unity. The Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (MPACC) will seek to be part of these efforts to bring our people together on the local, national and global levels.

Help Us Develop an Independent, Black Political Party

Editor’s Note: The following message was posted in February on behalf of the Ujima People’s Progress Party (UPP), which is currently building a Black Worker-Led Independent Political Party in Maryland.

Hi Friend,

Happy New Year maybe. 2020 was terrible, particularly for black people in the US. I think that actually having a happy new year would require serious personal and collective growth. Growth requires a critical evaluation of the past in order to avoid repeating mistakes and one makes plans for the future. In that vein of reflecting on the past, I want to share with you a short video (9 min) of Michael B. Jordan reciting a famous speech by the Chicago Black Panthers’ Chairman, Fred Hampton. I pulled out these three statements to give you a sense of the speech.

“We’ve got to face the fact that some people say you fight fire best with fire, but we say you put fire out best with water. We say you don’t fight racism with racism. We’re gonna fight racism with solidarity.”

“We say you don’t fight capitalism with no black capitalism; you fight capitalism with socialism.”

“I’m telling you that we’re living in a sick society. And anybody that endorses integrating into this sick society before it’s cleaned up is a man who’s committing a crime against the people. If you walk past a hospital room and see a sign that says “Contaminated” and then you try to lead people into that room, either those people are mighty dumb, you understand me… cause if they weren’t, they’d tell you that you are an unfair, unjust leader that does not have your followers’ interests in mind.”

Chairman Fred Hampton was assassinated in his bed by the Chicago PD at 21 years old. At that time in 1969, Chicago’s City Council and Mayoralty were controlled by the local, post-Civil Rights, Democratic Party as it is today. In my opinion, Hampton was right and still is today: Integrating into a sick society and its sick political values hasn’t paid off in fifty one years. Fifty one years later, we still don’t even have enough equality to be killed by police and hospitals at the same rate as white people. Fifty one years later, the median net wealth of black households is trending toward $0 dollars. Fifty one years later, the Democratic National Convention rejected the Movement for Black Lives’ proposal of the Breathe Act while the largest civil rights demonstrations in US history were in full swing. (Joe Biden and Kamala Harris don’t support the Breathe Act either.) I think that continuing to subordinate the political demands of black people, indigenous people and working class people to the priorities of capitalist, primarily white political parties is likely going to make 2021 as catastrophic for black people as was 2020. Asking Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi to support the Breathe Act (or anything that black people, poor people or the biosphere need) again is not a “strategy” that our leaders should have the audacity put forward in 2021.

Fortunately, this Kwanzaa, many of us spent some time reflecting on the principle of self-determination. Being self-determined would include coming to our own decisions about community safety, imperialism, capitalism, socialism, racism, ecology, etcetera and creating our own agendas. I’m part of an organization that’s working on this in our state. Ujima People’s Progress Party (UPP), a black, working class political party is planning a campaign to achieve ballot access in Maryland. If successful, UPP would become Maryland’s first, black, working class political party. (Roughly 30% of Maryland’s population is black.) No matter what state you’re in, any success that we have would probably produce positive spillover effects on independent, self-determining, black politics in your state. So I would be grateful for your involvement no matter where you live. If you’re not already connected to UPP and you support more choices for black voters, then hit me back and we’ll talk about the ways that you could consider supporting us.

…I hope that I’m communicating how imperative it is that black voters get greater ideological diversity on our ballots.

With the same old ideology in charge, 2021 is going to be as lethally anti-black as the last one. Black lives could matter, but they don’t because, fifty one years later, too many black leaders feel that a black political agenda is less important than the Democratic Party’s priorities. Too many black leaders feel that a back agenda is less important than the organized wealth of white liberals. Black lives will matter when black people link up, overcome our internalized racism enough to develop independent black power. Over 70 million voters just opted to re-elect the most overtly racist US President in recent history. And the incoming President won by trying to win over those same voters. If we don’t try something else, then in fifty one more years, my grandkids will have another lifetime of marching and asking America for equality to look forward to. Let’s try something else.

Happy new year “if you’re willing to fight for it”,
Thinq Tank

An update on the drive for a black, working class-led political party in Maryland:

One of our party leaders, Nnamdi Lumumba was recently interviewed by Dr. Jared Ball, a media and journalism professor here in Baltimore. This is a very important, 18-minute excerpt from that interview. It includes Nnamdi explaining why our party needs ballot access and our theory of power (within and outside of electoral politics). If you’re not sure about why black/African people in Maryland and the US need independent, political power, then I urge you to take a listen. And please consider making a contribution to our effort for ballot access.

I’ve been thinking that, ultimately, the success of this effort will come down to our own capacity to trust primarily black institutions as much as we trust primarily white institutions.

Can black people trust ourselves and other black people with independent, political leadership? Or is our internalized racism too deep for us to invest in a self-determined ideological vision?

Do we only trust a Colin Powell, a Barack Obama, a Kamala Harris or a Brandon Scott because their brown skin is backed up by the capitalist, imperialist, ecocidal politics of primarily white organizations?

Is our awareness of radical black politics so lacking and caricatured that we assume that a black-led party is just a bunch of “hoteps” who want revenge against white people?

From where does our endless confidence in the Democratic Party come – despite its persistent racism, over-policing, war and general shortcomings? And when will we start to keep that tireless energy for our own ideas and institutions?

I think that the answers to such questions are first answered on an individual basis. If, as individuals, we are going to wait until independent, black politics are embraced by the New York Times, CNN, Bernie Sanders, the NAACP, by mainstream America or by wealthier black people, then no, this initiative is going nowhere. But the reason why our organization even exists and why independent black power is even a possibility is because here in Maryland and around the world there have always been (and always will be) individuals who look to ourselves to affirm our own humanity and worth in spite of the violent exploitation that dominates the world. Many of those individuals got organized behind revolutionary ideas, despite the odds, which is what is happening right now in Maryland. If you’re one of those individuals, please make a contribution and let’s get organized!
Asante,
Thinq Tanq

The Ancestors’ Call: Six Music Icons, February – March 2025

The beginning of the year 2025 has brought great loss for the creative community, specifically in the area of music. Six legendary composers and performers were called from this earthly plane to the realm of the Honored Ancestors. During my career as a club and mobile disc jockey, I have played music from all of these artists and I have reveled in their creativity, their energy and the positive messages and vibes they shared through their music, from classic R&B, contemporary R&B, Hip Hop, Neo-Soul, House, Afro-House, Jazz and Funk, spanning the length, width and depth of Black Music. While I feel inadequate to pen a personal tribute to these great and now departed artists, we will share excerpts of biographical articles from the open-source online encyclopedia Wikipedia (with maybe a few of my comments thrown in) on singer-songwriter and politician Jerry “The Iceman” Butler; singer-songwriter Gwen McCrae; songwriter and musician Chris Jasper; composer and singer Roberta Flack; Hip Hop lyricist, actor and singer-songwriter Angie Stone; and composer, producer, bandleader and vibraphone legend Roy Ayers.

Jerry “The Iceman” Butler (Dec. 8, 1939 – Feb. 20, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Butler
Jerry Butler Jr. (December 8, 1939 – February 20, 2025) was an American soul singer-songwriter, producer, musician, and politician. He was the original lead singer of the R&B vocal group The Impressions, who were inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1991. After leaving the group in 1960, Butler achieved over 55 Billboard Pop and R&B Chart hits as a solo artist including “He Will Break Your Heart”, “Let It Be Me”, and “Only the Strong Survive”. He was inducted into the National Rhythm & Blues Hall of Fame in 2015.

Butler served as a Commissioner for Cook County, Illinois, from 1985 to 2018. As a member of the 17-member county government board, he chaired the Health and Hospitals Committee and served as Vice Chair of the Construction Committee.

Butler was first given the nickname “Iceman” by WDAS Philadelphia disc jockey, Georgie Woods, while performing in a Philadelphia theater. He released the single “He Will Break Your Heart” in 1960, and the song peaked at No. 7 on the Billboard pop chart. Butler co-wrote, with Otis Redding, the latter’s hit song “I’ve Been Loving You Too Long” in 1965. Butler’s solo career saw a string of hits, including the Top 10 successes “He Will Break Your Heart”, “Find Another Girl”, “I’m A-Telling You” (all co-written by fellow Impression Curtis Mayfield and featuring Mayfield as harmony vocal), the million selling “Only the Strong Survive”, “Moon River”, “Need To Belong” (recorded with the Impressions after he went solo), “Make It Easy on Yourself”, “Let It Be Me” (with Betty Everett), “Brand New Me”, “Ain’t Understanding Mellow” (with Brenda Lee Eager), “Hey, Western Union Man”, and “Never Give You Up”.

His wife Annette, originally one of his backup singers, died in 2019.

After his 1991 induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame as a member of The Impressions, some music writers and critics stated that Butler also deserved a second induction as a solo artist, based upon his successful career as a recording artist and songwriter after leaving that group.

Butler died from the effects of Parkinson’s disease at his home in Chicago, on February 20, 2025, at the age of 85.

Gwen McCrae (Dec. 21, 1943 – Feb. 21, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gwen_McCrae
Gwendolyn Patricia McCrae (née Mosley, December 21, 1943 – February 21, 2025) was an American singer, best known for her 1975 hit “Rockin’ Chair”. Known in the music industry as the “Queen of Rare Groove”, McCrae’s gospel, soul, disco and funk vocals have been heavily sampled by industry leaders in dance music including Cassius, Madlib, Lady Gaga, Avicii, Cypress Hill, Mobb Deep amongst others. McCrae had hits in both the U.S.A. and Europe and was particularly successful in Europe. She performed regularly until 2012. …

After TK Records collapsed, McCrae moved to New Jersey and signed with Atlantic Records, recording two albums and saw one of her singles, “Funky Sensation”, reach #22 on the R&B chart in 1981. In 1982, she had a moderate R&B hit with “Keep the Fire Burning”. She continued to record and some of her earlier recordings on the UK’s Northern Soul scene maintained her popularity as a live act in Europe. McCrae moved back to the United States, to Florida, recorded a one-off single for the small Black Jack label in 1984 called “Do You Know What I Mean”, and then temporarily retired from the music industry.

In June 2012, after performing on stage in England, she had a stroke which resulted in paralysis on the left side of her body and the inability to walk.

McCrae died at a care home in Miami on February 21, 2025, at the age of 81.

Chris Jasper (Dec. 30, 1951 – Feb. 23, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Jasper
Christopher Howard Jasper (December 30, 1951 – February 23, 2025) was an American singer, composer and producer. Jasper was a member of the Isley Brothers from 1973 to 1983, and Isley-Jasper-Isley from 1984 to 1987. He was also a successful solo musician and record producer, recording over 17 of his own solo albums, including four urban contemporary gospel albums, all written, produced and performed, both vocally and instrumentally, by Jasper. He also produced artists for his New York City-based record label, Gold City Records. Jasper’s keyboard and Moog synthesizer work is his signature contribution to the Isley Brothers’ music of the 1970s and 1980s when the Isley Brothers were a self-contained band.

In 2016, Jasper was awarded the National R&B Society Lifetime Achievement Award. In 2020, Jasper was awarded the Soultracks Lifetime Achievement Award. In 2022, Jasper, as a member of the Isley Brothers, was inducted into the Songwriters Hall of Fame.

Jasper died on February 23, 2025, two months after being diagnosed with cancer. He was 73.

Roberta Flack (Feb. 10, 1937 – Feb. 24, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberta_Flack
Roberta Cleopatra Flack (February 10, 1937 – February 24, 2025) was an American singer and pianist known for her emotive, genre-blending ballads that spanned R&B, jazz, folk, and pop and contributed to the birth of the quiet storm radio format. Her commercial success included the Billboard Hot 100 chart-topping singles “The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face”, “Killing Me Softly with His Song”, and “Feel Like Makin’ Love”. She became the first artist to win the Grammy Award for Record of the Year in consecutive years.

Flack frequently collaborated with Donny Hathaway, with whom she recorded several hit duets, including “Where Is the Love” and “The Closer I Get to You”. She was one of the defining voices of 1970s popular music and remained active in the industry, later finding success with duets such as “Tonight, I Celebrate My Love” with Peabo Bryson (1983) and “Set the Night to Music” with Maxi Priest (1991). Across her decades-long career, she interpreted works by songwriters such as Leonard Cohen and members of the Beatles. In 2020, Flack received the Grammy Lifetime Achievement Award. …

In 2018, Flack was appearing onstage at the Apollo Theater at a benefit for the Jazz Foundation of America when she became ill, left the stage and was rushed to the Harlem Hospital Center. In a statement, her manager announced that Flack had had a stroke a few years prior and still was not feeling well, but was “doing fine” and was being kept overnight for medical observation.

In late 2022, it was announced that Flack had been diagnosed with ALS and had retired from performing, as the disease was making it “impossible to sing”.

Flack died of cardiac arrest on February 24, 2025, on her way to a hospital in Manhattan. She was 88 years old.

At her March 10 memorial service, Lauryn Hill sang a tribute performance of “The First Time Ever I Saw Your Face” and, alongside Wyclef Jean and Stevie Wonder, “Killing Me Softly With His Song”.

Angie Stone (Dec. 18, 1961 – March 1, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angie_Stone
Angela Laverne Stone (née Brown; December 18, 1961 – March 1, 2025) was an American singer, songwriter, actress, and record producer. She rose to fame in the late 1970s as a member of the hip hop trio The Sequence. In the early 1990s, she became a member of the R&B trio Vertical Hold. Stone then signed with Arista Records to release her debut solo album Black Diamond (1999), which received a gold certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and spawned the single “No More Rain (In This Cloud)”.

After transitioning to J Records, she released her second album, Mahogany Soul (2001), which spawned the hit single “Wish I Didn’t Miss You”. It was followed by Stone Love (2004) and The Art of Love & War (2007), her first number-one album on the US Billboard Top R&B/Hip-Hop Albums chart.

Stone ventured into acting in the 2000s, making her film debut in the 2002 comedy film The Hot Chick, and her stage debut in 2003, in the role of Big Mama Morton in the Broadway musical Chicago. She then went on to appear in supporting roles in films and television series as well as several musical productions, including VH1’s Celebrity Fit Club and TV One’s R&B Divas, and movies such as The Fighting Temptations (2003), Pastor Brown (2009), and School Gyrls (2010).

Stone was nominated for three Grammy Awards and won two Soul Train Lady of Soul Awards. In 2021, she received the Soul Music Icon Award at the Black Music Honors. In 2024, she was a featured vocalist on Damon Little’s “No Stressing”, which peaked at #1 on Billboard’s Gospel Airplay chart.

Stone was killed in a car accident near Montgomery, Alabama, on March 1, 2025, at the age of 63. She and her band members were traveling in a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter to Atlanta following a Mardi Gras concert in Mobile, Alabama, when it overturned on Interstate 65; the vehicle was then hit by a Freightliner Cascadia semi-trailer truck. Stone was the only fatality.

Roy Ayers (Sept. 10, 1940 – March 4, 2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Ayers
Roy Edward Ayers Jr. (September 10, 1940 – March 4, 2025) was an American vibraphonist, record producer and composer. Ayers began his career as a post-bop jazz artist, releasing several studio albums with Atlantic Records, before his tenure at Polydor Records beginning in the 1970s, during which he helped to pioneer jazz-funk. He was a key figure in the acid jazz movement, and has been described as “The Godfather of Neo Soul”. He was best known for his compositions “Everybody Loves the Sunshine”, “Running Away”, and “Freaky Deaky” and others that charted in the 1970s. At one time Ayers was listed among the performers whose music was most often sampled by rappers.

Ayers started recording as a bebop sideman in 1962. In 1963, he released his debut studio album West Coast Vibes featuring a collaboration with the saxophonist Curtis Amy. He rose to prominence when he dropped out of Los Angeles City College and joined jazz flautist Herbie Mann in 1966.

In the early 1970s, Ayers formed his own band, Roy Ayers Ubiquity, a name he chose because ubiquity meant a state of being everywhere at the same time.

Ayers was responsible for the highly regarded soundtrack to Jack Hill’s 1973 blaxploitation film Coffy, which starred Pam Grier. He played Elgin in Idaho Transfer the same year. He later moved from a jazz-funk sound to R&B, as heard on Mystic Voyage (1975), which featured the songs “Evolution” and the underground disco hit “Brother Green (The Disco King)”, as well as the title track from his studio album Everybody Loves the Sunshine (1976).

In 1977, Ayers produced an album by the group RAMP, Come into Knowledge. That fall, he had his biggest hit with “Running Away”.

In late 1979, Ayers scored his only top ten single on Billboard’s Hot Disco/Dance chart with “Don’t Stop the Feeling”, which was also the leadoff single from his studio album No Stranger to Love (1980). The title track was sampled in Jill Scott’s 2000 song “Watching Me” from her debut studio album Who Is Jill Scott?: Words and Sounds Vol. 1.

Ayers died at a hospital in Manhattan, New York, on March 4, 2025, at the age of 84, after suffering from a long illness.

Must Autocracy Gut America?

Well, it has happened again. After months of being subjected to the spectacles of Donald Trump’s traveling circus — I mean, presidential campaign — complete with race-baiting, immigrant-bashing, music-swaying, retribution-threatening, woman-taunting and debate-dodging by former president Trump, as well as a mixture of “they’re all the same” dare-the-oppressor-to-win bravado and “we must stop Trump” Vote-Blue-No-Matter-Who desperation from Pan Afrikan activists, Black Nationalists, mainstream political operatives and the grassroots Afrikan American community, Trump once again has ascended to the most powerful political post on earth and control of the planet’s deadliest arsenal.

This time, not only did Trump win the much-maligned Electoral College, he also won the popular vote, having somehow persuaded the majority of the American electorate that he was the best choice to lead the United States for the next four years despite what could only be described as a “shit show” of a campaign in which he embarrassingly lost a debate to vice president Kamala Harris and then refused any more debate offers, held numerous rallies in which he rambled almost incoherently and swayed to music almost absent-mindedly, and finished off with the infamous event at New York City’s Madison Square Garden complete with references to a “floating island of garbage” called Puerto Rico and authoritarian speeches by Stephen Miller and more of his right-wing acolytes. People watched the November 5 election returns with a mixture of disbelief and horror, then ran to whatever sources of comfort they could find on social media and personal telephone trees to help pull them from the deep depression and sense of resignation they had plunged into because of the sudden and shocking knowledge that their Deadly Enemy, Oppressor and Tormentor, who they thought had been vanquished four years ago, was back with a vengeance.

The blame game has already started in an attempt to hold someone responsible for Harris’s shocking defeat to an old, brash, proudly ignorant man who promised to deport a record number of immigrants, finish his “Wall” which he never completed in his first term, implement “concepts of a plan” for health care which he also failed to complete in his first term, grant immunity to police for their “stop and frisk” misdeeds, support even more atrocities against Palestinians by Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/10/us-israel-trump-phone-call-netanyahu-gaza-cease-fire-2024-election.html; https://nypost.com/2024/10/18/us-news/trump-accuses-biden-of-trying-to-hold-back-netanyahu-after-israels-killing-of-hamas-leader-yahya-sinwar/), coddle dictators from Mohammed Bin Salman to Vladimir Putin, re-establish “drill baby drill” oil exploration in protected areas and more as he establishes himself as “dictator for a day” (certainly no one expects his “dictatorship” to end after only one day).

As the reports of the polling results poured in, analysts discussed the districts that had voted to support Trump, as well as those where Harris won but seriously underperformed compared to Biden in 2020. In the run-up to the election, speculation had abounded that Black men were supporting Trump in large numbers, but this turned out not to be the case at all. Black men and Black women had come out heavily in support of Harris’s candidacy (though in some areas, not as strongly as expected). Instead, support for Trump seemed to come from two rather surprising (to me) communities. I’m looking at you, Latino community. I’m looking at you, White women.

Maybe I didn’t understand you as well as I might have thought. Maybe Great White Father’s oppression isn’t such a big deal after all.

According to demographic information that was coming in with the voting numbers during the night, in several districts, especially in the critical “battleground” states of Georgia and Pennsylvania, Harris was not receiving the support that Biden had four years earlier. Many of these turned out to be heavily-Latino districts, and the dwindling support in these communities ultimately made the difference between Harris overcoming or not overcoming areas where Trump was expected to receive heavy support, a difference that might have at least swung Pennsylvania to her and won her the White House. But that support did not come, at least not as strongly as expected, and in the wee hours of the night Trump took the Keystone State, essentially sealing his victory. These districts were known for their heavy Latino (the news reports used the term “Hispanic”) populations, and the support Trump seemed to receive from them came despite his regularly denigrating Mexican “illegals”, threatening the largest deportation action in US history, spreading lies about Haitian immigrants “eating the dogs … eating the cats” of the citizens in Springfield, Ohio and having a guest at his Madison Square Garden rally refer to Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage”. If this support was because these communities were “legal immigrants” and Trump’s vitriol had been directed at “illegals”, then they forget the occasional references to broader deportation plans as well as the danger that Trump (or Vance) would target them later, as was explained by the words of German theologian Friedrich Gustav Emil Martin Niemoller, best known for this 1946 poem written after the Nazis’ genocide against the Jews, Muslims, Roma, Afrikans, the disabled, homosexuals and others during World War II:

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
—Martin Niemöller

Even more surprising, in Florida, where an abortion-rights measure won a majority of votes (but short of the 60% plurality required to pass it), White women in Florida — for whom the measure was written in support of their right to bodily autonomy and life-saving medical care — voted in support of the Florida Senator (Rick Scott) and the presidential candidate (Trump) who had campaigned on defeating that same measure and banning the right to reproductive choice across the country. If this trend held in other areas of the country, it indicates that the “gender gap” which would have favored Harris was offset by a “race gap” in favor of Trump. (https://newrepublic.com/post/188061/white-women-harris-trump-exit-polls)

Thus, the community that Trump had demonized since the day in 2015 when he rode down a New York escalator and declared that Mexicans were “bringing drugs … bringing crime” appeared to throw much of their support behind this same man in district after district, and White women were identified as having voted for the accused serial adulterer and misogynist Trump almost as heavily as White men. This would strongly imply that, despite the segments of the general American community that have rejected racism, there are still considerable numbers of citizens who, quite frankly, have not.

And for those looking for an excuse to pin responsibility on third-party candidates and their supporters (as has often happened in the past), those voters were at least voting their conscience, supporting candidates such as Dr. Cornel West (independent candidacy), Dr. Jill Stein (Green Party USA) and Claudia De La Cruz (Party for Socialism and Liberation) because of specific platform planks favoring reparations for the descendants of Afrikans who were enslaved in the United States and support for Palestinian freedom, defense, independence and recognition by the international community. They were not voting for these candidates because “he’s just like me” as one White woman was reportedly quoted as saying about the man who is most assuredly nothing like her, or because of “his policies” as some members of communities of color seemed to think of the man who shows his racial animus on a regular basis, and will likely prove that animus as he rolls out more brazen and more draconian policies during this next term, from deportations to increased police powers to “anti-woke” employee pogroms. And it was not third-party votes that tipped the balance in the contest between Harris and Trump. No, that falls squarely on those who were playing the binary “him or her” game and came down on the side of “him” even when it seemed contrary to their own personal or community interests.

The election of Trump to a second term despite his earlier felony convictions, his attempt to incite a violent overthrow of the US government on January 6, 2021 and the consistent race-baiting and xenophobic tactics of his campaign rallies told me one thing: America is still a deeply racist (and sexist) society. A White male who was impeached twice, convicted several times, indicted dozens of times, declared bankruptcy seven times despite having inherited millions from a father who himself was charged with acts of racism, sued scores of times, and who has often bragged about his ability to escape the consequences of his lawlessness was seen as a better representative of the people of the United States than a veteran prosecutor, district attorney, Senator and vice president who happened to be a woman of color. Harris’s campaign, despite the recriminations of some, was a far more focused and disciplined effort than that of Hillary Clinton in 2016. Harris had enlisted the support of Beyonce, Bruce Springsteen, Republican former Senator Liz Cheney, former president Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama, as well as former Trump Cabinet members John Kelly and Mike Milley who attested to Trump’s unfitness for the presidency. None of that mattered, as Harris failed to even secure a sufficient chunk of the popular vote from two groups for whom she had specifically campaigned on behalf of reproductive rights and immigrant rights. Both of those groups in large measure seemed to turn on her, siding with their Great White Father when it counted. (Perhaps that should not be so surprising considering the parade of prominent Afrikan American athletes and entertainers who had marched to Trump Tower in New York after his 2016 victory to meet him and, essentially, kiss his ring.)

Now, having cast about for appropriate targets to whom to apportion blame, it’s time for the hand-wringing. How did we wind up in this situation again? What can we expect from Trump and his plans to implement his Agenda 47 and the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025? How can we protect ourselves in the future from the abuses of a president who had already shown us what we once thought was the worst he could do to us, the country and the world? And what could we now expect from the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, the January 6 insurrectionists and other, less well known right-wing groups now emboldened by their hero being given one more bite at the apple?

We have found ourselves in this situation before. So often, in fact, that we should not have been taken by surprise this time. It happened when George W. Bush won in 2000, when Ronald Reagan won in 1980 and when Richard Nixon took the White House in 1968. Each time, activists in the Afrikan American community reacted as though hit in the head with a hammer. This same tired act plays out every time a reactionary right-wing politician seizes control of the levers of power and we as a community suddenly feel cornered.

On November 10, 2016, I wrote a commentary, “So … Are You Ready To Organize NOW?” in which I challenged our community to finally make good on our collective bravado. Back then, I had written:

My friends had dared America to elect another hard-right president with ties (in Trump’s case) to White nationalist right-wing groups, predicting that such a result would shake us out of the complacency we had willfully enjoyed (failing to pressure the most recent administration to deliver on the great promise of the last eight years) during the presidency of Barack Obama.

When a similar situation had arisen in 2000, many of our activists failed to rise up and organize in opposition to the Bush-Cheney agenda.  Whites did more on a national scale with Occupy Wall Street and the anti-WTO protests that had been named the “Battle in Seattle” than we did to mobilize our community.  Of late, only Black Lives Matter (launched during the Obama Administration as a result of police–and police wannabe–killings of Black youth such as Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown) has reached the level of serious grassroots organizing among the Black community, and many of us have questioned BLM’s orientation toward gay rights and its alleged connections with George Soros.  Still, those critics have yet to birth a serious national Black movement of their own. …

Will the ascendancy of Trump to the single most powerful political position on the planet serve as the spark for us to finally organize ourselves?  Or will many of our people once again retreat to the shadows, afraid of the repercussions of opposition to the latest Head of the Oppressor State?

Well, we got our answer in large measure after that. Again, many of us hid under our beds, waiting for the storm to pass. Then, when Joe Biden won in 2020, we relaxed, came out, enjoyed the sun, and went to a blissful sleep. When we did gather, ostensibly to discuss our situation in America and plan our response on behalf of our people, the results were mixed. In April 2023, there was the State of the Black World Conference at the Baltimore Convention Center, where a line of activists spoke about Black people coming together, but no concrete action was taken at that Conference to make it so. Since that time, at least four planned Pan African Conferences, in Zimbabwe, Uganda, Ghana and Togo, were announced, scheduled, and suddenly canceled. The Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (MPACC) was started in January 2022 to encourage us to finally take concrete steps to at least encourage Pan Afrikan organizations to begin the process of working together and to explore possibilities of expanding that effort outside the state of Maryland. But even that effort has not been embraced by many of our activists. Then, as the presidential election came closer and closer, some of us became nervous and started proposing broader meetings with the idea of promoting unity. But before that effort could get rolling, we saw the “American carnage” of the November 5 presidential election, and there have been numerous fearful posts on social media about what to expect next.

We should have gotten used to this by now. In fact, we should have prepared ourselves for just this eventuality decades ago. It’s almost as though the Nixon administration and COINTELPRO taught us nothing. As organizers and activists, we should have been organizing our communities and working with each other cooperatively long ago. We gather at conferences and talk about coming together and organizing, but we don’t just go ahead and do it. I would ask, as I did in November 2016, if after the fear and loathing that this latest electoral insult has administered, we are ready to organize ourselves at last. But I think I will save my breath on that particular question, and just wait for the wailing and gnashing of teeth to subside.

The Forked Tongue Files of Electoral Poly-Tricks: November 2024

The country holds its breath as Election Day approaches. The major candidates hold massive rallies in a last-ditch effort to mobilize voters in their favor, even as they confidently predict victory for themselves and their followers nervously watch the early vote totals and crunch the latest poll numbers. People in the electorate struggle to sort out fact from fiction in the face of a constant onslaught of disinformation (complete with “deep fake” videos and posts on X), they speculate among each other about the latest developments, they argue in favor of their preferred candidates, or they debate the merits of participating in the electoral process at all. For someone trying to understand the political intrigues and make an informed voting decision, things can get quite confusing.

In the final week leading up to the November 5 general election, the main antagonists decided to give the public a little push, making their “closing arguments” in an effort to secure as many votes as possible by providing a peek as to how they plan to move the country forward (or backward).

One Last Appeal to the Voters

On Sunday October 27, former president Donald Trump held a rally at Madison Square Garden (MSG), at which a comedian referred to Puerto Rico as “a floating island of garbage” among other racist and otherwise xenophobic remarks from a variety of speakers (https://www.npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-s1-5167948/the-offensive-rhetoric-used-at-trumps-madison-square-garden-rally; https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/10/trump-madison-square-garden-rally/680424/). Trump acolyte and political advisor Stephen Miller continued the authoritarian language (“America is for Americans and Americans only”; https://forward.com/opinion/668440/miller-trump-madison-square-garden-immigrants/) he had used to threaten opponents of the Trump administration years ago when Trump was in the White House. And Trump himself, when asked later to apologize for the rally’s more divisive and xenophobic rhetoric, instead tried to disavow any knowledge of such hateful rhetoric and insisted that the event was an “absolute lovefest”, reminiscent of his insistence that the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol was “a day of love”. Critics and analysts compared this event to a Nazi rally at the same Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1939_Nazi_rally_at_Madison_Square_Garden). Trump’s MSG rally came within a week of former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s manic and misogynistic “Daddy’s home and you’ve been a bad girl” screed at an October 23 Turning Point Action rally in Duluth, Georgia (https://newrepublic.com/post/187485/tucker-carlson-daddy-trump-spanking-speech). The level of vitriol at these rallies led Puerto Rican musician Nicky Jam, who Trump had referred to as a “Black music superstar” and misgendered as “she” at an earlier rally, to withdraw his endorsement for Trump, stating that Puerto Ricans “deserve respect.”

On Tuesday October 29, vice president Kamala Harris derided Trump as “deranged and unhinged” at a rally she held on the same grounds where Trump had delivered his January 6, 2021 speech that had helped incite the insurrection and attack on the US Capitol, and made what has been billed as her “closing argument” in which she formally asked for the votes of the American people. She touted the planks of her agenda designed to protect women’s reproductive rights, provide tax breaks to middle class and working families, and lend an ear to those who disagree with her policies, in contrast to Trump’s claims that he would seek to prosecute and imprison those who oppose him as “the enemy from within”.

Propaganda and Scuttlebutt

Harris has been derided by her political opponents for her supposed lack of intelligence, a claim that frankly does not hold water, as well as her alleged support for “putting ‘illegals’ up in five star hotels” (a charge that has been repeatedly disputed) and providing sex-change operations for prisoners (a charge made repeatedly with carefully selected video snippets in commercials approved by Trump). Others have questioned her Blackness, spurred on by Trump’s claim at a National Association of Black Journalists event earlier this summer that Harris, a graduate of Howard University and a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority “suddenly became Black”, and she has been pilloried by some in the Afrikan-American community for allegedly not planning any policies that would specifically benefit Black Americans. While these claims have also been disputed, and she has herself increased her outreach to Afrikan American groups and announced a number of policies (homeowner credits, child tax credits, assistance in starting small businesses) that, if implemented, would assist Black voters, this has not convinced a number of her critics whom it has been alleged have held her to a higher standard of proof than her Republican opponent.

Meanwhile, Democratic supporters point to Trump’s embrace of international autocrats (Viktor Orban of Hungary, Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, Kim Jong Un of North Korea, former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro, former Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte and Russia’s Vladimir Putin); his romanticizing of historical dictators (his former Chief of Staff, John Kelly, recently recounted Trump’s comments that he wished he had “Hitler’s generals” working for him); his comments about being “a dictator for one day”, getting rid of the Constitution and jailing his political opponents; and the policies that have been directly espoused by Trump (which many of his supporters claim is their motivation for voting for him): mass deportations, a return to “stop-and-frisk” policing, elimination of the Department of Education, expansion of the ban on abortions that was started by the Supreme Court’s striking down the historic 1973 Roe v. Wade case on June 24, 2022, and an increase in “drill baby drill” oil exploration in deep water locations, Indigenous territories and protected ecosystems among others. Project 2025, the “Mandate for Leadership wish list” produced by The Heritage Foundation, is most often referenced in this regard; its 922 pages are an intimidating read for many, but a more abbreviated version can be found on Trump’s own Web site in his Agenda 47, or his “promises to the American people”.

Check out The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 here: (https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf)

Read Donald Trump’s Agenda 47 at his Web site here: (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/)

Read the Democratic Party’s political platform here: (https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf)

Blotting Out Third Parties

In the meantime, the voices of Green Party presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein and independent candidate Dr. Cornel West, both of whom have made reparations for the descendants of enslaved Afrikans, environmental stewardship and justice for Palestinians currently cowering under a genocidal assault from Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israeli Defense Forces major planks in their presidential agendas, are being silenced by the mass media’s obsession with the two-party race between the Donkey and the Elephant. And the platform of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), whose candidate is Claudia De La Cruz, gets even less attention, to say nothing about that of the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver.

Read the Green Party platform here: (https://www.gp.org/platform)

Check out Dr. Cornel West’s platform here:. (https://www.cornelwest2024.com/platform)

Read the Party for Socialism and Liberation’s platform here: (https://votesocialist2024.com/about-the-candidates)

The Libertarian Party’s platform can be found here: (https://www.lp.org/platform/)

Historic (and Ahistoric) Implications

To be sure, this election carries historic implications even if one’s tunnel vison keeps one focused only on the two major political parties and their standard bearers. Kamala Harris may yet become the first woman US president in history, accomplishing the feat that former First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had failed to accomplish in 2016 (though she actually did beat Trump by several million votes, losing only because of the slave-era Electoral College and its arcane method of allocating a disproportionate number of electoral votes to the southern states). Harris would follow former president Barck Obama as the second president of Afrikan ancestry (her father is Afro-Caribbean) and make history again as the first president of East Indian ancestry (her mother was East Indian). Meanwhile, Trump would establish a somewhat dubious historical precedent himself, becoming the first president (or one of the first) to win the White House, lose it somewhat resoundingly in the following election, then win it back later; he could also become the first president who had been impeached twice and indicted for a number of felonies (including inciting an insurrection) before and after winning the White House a second time.

The implications of this election have been emphasized (some would say hyped) in classic dualistic, good-vs.-evil fashion. Some examples:

  • Abortion (“pro-choice”) versus anti-abortion (“pro-life”): women’s reproductive rights versus going back to the days before Roe v. Wade when women bled to death in alleys, only this time dying because of a wider ban on reproductive care of practically any kind, including in cases pf rape, incest or when the life of the woman is in danger. (Anti-abortion activists might consider this a reasonable trade-off, while abortion-rights activists have recently pointed out that in some states, a woman is not allowed to abort a pregnancy until she is literally at death’s door; a compromise might involve protections for a fetus past an agreed point in a pregnancy but not cause undue risks to the health of the mother.)
  • Environmental stewardship versus a return to “drill baby drill” and the elimination of electric car mandates, though Harris has herself stated that she will not stop hydraulic fracturing or “fracking”, which is a particularly devastating procedure involving injection of toxic chemicals into the ground to facilitate extraction of natural gas.
  • Establishment of a legal pathway to citizenship for immigrants versus mass deportations. Trump supporters accuse Harris of trying to import millions of illegal immigrants and use them to illegally vote her into office. Opponents of Trump point to the singularly cruel practice of separating children from their families during his presidential term. Between 500 and a thousand of these children still had not been reunited with their families as of earlier this year, and critics have stated that, concerning the Trump administration policy, “the cruelty was the point.”
  • Police review boards versus “stop and frisk” and qualified immunity for police officers who abuse citizens. Despite Trump’s attempts to paint the January 6, 2021 insurrectionists, who had injured numerous Capitol Police that day, he continues to support the brutal actions of police across the country, at least when they brutalize “others” (Afrikan Americans, immigrants and the “libs” that he and his supporters want to “own”).
  • Expansion of voting rights versus voter suppression in the name of “ballot security” and “stopping voter fraud” (cases alleging this, largely in Afrikan American districts, have been dismissed in courts across the country).
  • Embracing democracy versus supporting international autocrats, living and dead, including Adolph Hitler.
  • The Death Penalty. While this issue has not received as much attention as perhaps it should, it must be pointed out that, when the execution of Marcellus Williams was debated in the Supreme Court in September, the six Republican-appointed justices (Alito, Thomas, Cavanaugh, Coney-Barrett, Gorsuch, Roberts) voted to execute him, while the three Democratic-appointed justices (Sotomayor, Brown-Jackson, Kagan) voted to block the execution. As a result of the Supreme Court decision, Missouri’s Republican governor Mike Parson, attorney general Andrew Bailey and the Missouri Supreme Court proceeded with the execution of Williams on Tuesday, September 24, over the public objections of the victim’s family (who simply did not want him executed) and the original case’s prosecuting attorney (who was now convinced Williams might have been wrongly convicted). This is somewhat consistent with the trend among Republican governors, presidents and judges in favor of “hang ’em high” capital punishment regardless of evidence of possible innocence. (https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/09/supreme-court-allows-marcellus-williams-to-be-executed/)

Dr. Ron Daniels, founder and president of the Institute of the Black World (IBW), posted a commentary (Democracy in Danger: Black Led Rainbow Wave to the Rescue – Dedicated to Rev. Jesse L. Jackson on His 83rd Birthday, by Dr. Ron Daniels, October 8, 2024) that essentially urged readers to go to the polls in unprecedented numbers to support Harris, based largely on the critical need to prevent a Trump presidency that could usher in a dark chapter in the United States of autocracy, repression and White Supremacist terrorism. (Read the article here: https://ibw21.org/commentary/vantage-point-articles/democracy-in-danger-black-led-rainbow-wave-to-the-rescue/?sourceid=1041761&emci=86dbe1e0-9c85-ef11-8474-6045bda8aae9&emdi=8889e938-bd85-ef11-8474-6045bda8aae9&ceid=10955336)

Electoral Poly-Tricks

As we have mentioned above, all of this has obscured information on the other “third party” candidacies of Dr. Cornel West, Dr. Jill Stein, Claudia De La Cruz and Chase Oliver. As a result, we careen into election season with limited to no knowledge about our full plate of options. Some would say that this helps to crystallize the real issues because the likelihood that anyone other than Harris or Trump will win the election is practically nil. Still, it has been stated often that a well-informed populace is necessary to a healthy democracy, and in many ways we as an electorate are often anything but well-informed. This article is admittedly late to the party, since a large percentage of the electorate has already voted early or by mail, but those who plan to go to the polls on Election Day and have time to follow some of the above links might gain some perspective that they did not have before. Our concern is that people go to the polls with some perspective, and that we think before we make a knee-jerk voting decision.

On Saturday, October 12, a Pan Afrikan Community Town Hall Meeting was held at the Temple of New African Thought (TNAT) on Harford Road in East Baltimore. The panel included Dr. Ausar Winkler, a trauma expert, counselor and founder of TNAT; Bro. Everett Winchester, co-president of the UNIA-ACL Division 106 Barca-Clarke in Baltimore; and Bro. Nnamdi Lumumba, founder of the Ujima People’s Progress Party (UPP), which is building a Black worker-led political party in Maryland. The topic of the Town Hall was “Electoral Poly-Tricks”, designed to discuss the community’s understanding and approach to the electoral process and not to hold a candidate’s forum or push any particular political platform. The panelists discussed their different political positions, whether they involved the community’s specific issues, reaching out to the grassroots or supporting third parties. The attendees, in person and on Zoom, expressed their support for Kamala Harris (most importantly to “stop Donald Trump”), their interest in candidacies like those of Dr. Cornel West and Dr. Jill Stein, their unfamiliarity with the issues proposed by PSL’s De La Cruz, or their ambivalence about voting altogether. (It was acknowledged that the attendees would be less likely to vote for Trump or even the relatively conservative Libertarian candidate, Chase Oliver.) They also stressed the need for us as Afrikan People to do a better job of connecting the activists with the grassroots community and to establish our own Pan Afrikan Agenda, linked with an independent political organizing body, separate from Democratic, Republican or other outside influence, built to represent the people’s needs. (Read our report on the October 12 Town Hall here.)

Our take at the October 12 “Electoral Poly-Tricks” Pan Afrikan Community Town Hall was, and is, this: choose to vote or choose not to vote, but as long as one is working in some way to lift up our community, their personal belief should not be denigrated. It comes down to a personal choice whether one votes for Harris, votes for a third party, votes for Trump (though it appeared no one in attendance was voting for Trump, and his platform, with all of its self-professed misogyny, racism and autocracy, does seem to us to be completely inimical to Pan Afrikan uplift) or chooses not to vote at all.

We recognize that, for some, they see little difference between Harris and Trump: both will allow extractive industries to continue, both oppose reparations for enslavement, both will support Netanyahu and Israel even as their actions in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and now Iran skirt international law and even break it altogether. Some of us will refuse to support imperialism from either a Harris or Trump administration, and that principled stand is honorable. Others, however, see the differences, many of which have been listed above, but most importantly, the embrace of international dictators and domestic White Supremacist terrorists by Trump, and the efforts to eliminate all form of reproductive freedom by the Republican Party in general, which has become a political party in full thrall to the Orange One.  Those who are focused on these contrasts see “stopping Trump” and preventing the United States from plunging into a possible full-blown dictatorship that could endanger the entire planet as Priority One, to be pursued before any of the other issues that we have with both political parties can even be confronted.

Whatever your motivations are and whatever your political calculus is, the important thing is that you think about your voting decisions and not simply make them by rote, for convenience or out of pure emotion. Know why you are casting a ballot for one candidate or another, or refusing to cast a ballot at all. But also know this: whoever becomes the next president of the United States is not your savior, especially if you are a person of Afrikan descent. We all hailed Barack Obama as our hero when he was elected in 2008. The Rev. Jesse Jackson cried on camera. We danced in the streets, jubilant that Our Hero had won and would sort everything out. We were in a Post-Racial America, the pundits said. Then the drone attacks in Afghanistan increased. Then the whistleblowers were increasingly prosecuted instead of heeded. Then the 2009 follow-up review sessions of the 2001 World Conference Against Racism were minimized and even snubbed. Then, in March of 2011, Libya, once one of the most literate nations in the world and the African Union’s largest single benefactor, was bombed into the last century by the US and NATO, and Muammar Gadafi, the onetime Pan-Arab supporter of terrorist organizations who had apologized for his past, made reparation to the survivors and families of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, pledged to suppress Arab terrorism and converted to a position of Pan-Afrikanism, was killed by rebels in Libya as a result of the US and NATO strikes, resulting in Libya becoming the basket case it is today and its military arsenal falling into the hands of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Labat (ISIL) and Nigeria’s Boko Haram, the abductors of the Chibok Girls less than a year later. These things occurred under the Obama administration, and we can expect other objectionable actions by the US to occur under a Harris administration, or even a West or Stein administration, and certainly under a Trump administration.

The point is this: a “president of the United States” is going to do “president of the United States”-type things. Some of those things will be reprehensible, and we must be ready to fight them. No matter what decision you make in this election, know that you will have to be ready to resist and fight whoever wins, even the candidate you support. Our great mistake as a people has been that we either go to sleep when “our hero” is elected, expecting them to handle everything for us, or we run and hide when “the enemy” wins, waiting for the storm to pass in four years, instead of asserting our Constitutional right as American citizens to use our voice and leverage our right to free speech to oppose those deeds that go against the people and against truth, justice and righteousness.

Vote or don’t vote. But do something to lift up your community, and if you do vote, know who and what you are voting for, know what the consequences will be of your decision, and be ready to continue to organize our community for the time that we will need to raise our voices. For rest assured, that time will come.

 

 

 

 

April 16-19, 2024: Third Session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent, Geneva, Switzerland

April 16-19, 2024 is the Third Session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent (PFPAD), which was created by the United Nations just under two years ago.  PFPAD has held two Sessions already, one in Geneva, Switzerland in December 2022 and another in New York City in June 2023.  This Third Session will be held in Geneva, Switzerland from April 16-19, 2024.

Our interest in this Third Session stems from one of the “Spokes” in the “Spokes of the Wheel” diagram of the Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (https://kuumbareport.com/spokes-of-the-wheel/maryland-pan-african-cooperative-coalition-mpacc/) that has served as sort of an unofficial logo for the Cooperative Coalition: International Pan Afrikan Activism.  Many of the issues we face on the ground where we live stem from decisions that are made by heads of state and by international bodies like the United Nations, African Union, and Organization of American States that deal with the human rights of the citizens of countries, of ethnic and religious minorities, of women and children, and of migrants.  Misdeeds by states (apartheid in South Africa and the genocide in Darfur are two examples) can often be mitigated and finally brought to a halt by concerted and persistent action by international grassroots activists, either through protests at embassies or presentations at international conferences and sessions such as those held by the Permanent Forum.  Thus, this Third Session in Geneva is directly related to our work as a Cooperative Coalition to bring a variety of forces to bear in a combined, cooperative effort to improve and enrich the lives of Afrikan People.

Sis. Tomiko of Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign (APP-HRC), SOLITUDE and the Maryland Pan Afrikan Cooperative Coalition (MPACC) is leading a delegation of experts to the Third Session, concentrating on issues of Mass Incarceration, Reparative Justice and Women of Afrikan Descent.  She led this same panel of experts to the Organization of American States (OAS) Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) in Washington, DC last November, and her panel made quite an impression on the OAS Commissioners.  Our prayer to the Creator and the Ancestors is that they will guide her panel at this Third Session so they can make a similar strong impression on the Third Session of PFPAD and strike yet another blow for Afrikan People.

The following come from the Web sites that are linked below, in case you want to know more about the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent (PFPAD) and the Third Session taking place next week in Geneva, Switzerland.  Each session listed below includes links (full Web addresses that can be copied and pasted to your browser in case the link doesn’t work) to learn more about the Sessions and to arrange to attend the Sessions over the Internet.

(1) This first link is to general information about the Third Session of PFPAD.  You’re invited to check the link for more detail on this Session:

Third session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent | OHCHR
https://www.ohchr.org/en/events/sessions/2024/third-session-permanent-forum-people-african-descent

Third session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent

DATE: 16 – 19 April 2024

LOCATION: PALAIS DES NATIONS OF THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICE IN GENEVA, SWITZERLAND

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) is pleased to announce that the third session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent will take place from 16 – 19 April 2024 in the Palais des Nations of the United Nations Office in Geneva, Switzerland.

(2) There are also several specific Side Events taking place during the Third Session.  This is one of the early events of the week.  Our own Sis. Tomiko is helping organize this Side Event for Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign, which will take place on Tuesday, April 16:

Third session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent: Side event – Global Mass Incarceration a… (sched.com)
https://thirdsessionpfpad2024.sched.com/event/1br8X/side-event-global-mass-incarceration-and-reparative-justice-a-roundtable-discussion

GLOBAL MASS INCARCERATION AND REPARATIVE JUSTICE: A ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION

Date: 16 April 2024, 18:15 – 19:45 (6:15 pm – 7:45 pm Geneva Time; 12:15 pm – 1:45 pm Eastern Time)

Organizers:

  • Geneva Graduate Institute-Gender Centre;
  • Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign/SOLITUDE

Language of the event: English

Description of the event:
This roundtable discussion will explore the issue of mass incarceration of African descendent women and women of color on a global scale. Our speakers will shed light on the historical links between slavery, colonialism and mass incarceration, and discuss activist struggles and the global reparations movement against the overarching carceral landscape of the world.

Location: Auditorium A2, Maison de la paix, Geneva Graduate Institute
https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/communications/events/global-mass-incarceration-and-reparative-justice-roundtable-discussion

PANELISTS

Moderation: Nicole Bourbonnais, Geneva Graduate Institute.

This is a hybrid event. Please register below to attend the event online or in person.

REGISTER TO ATTEND THIS EVENT ONLINE:

Register: https://iheid.webex.com/weblink/register/r53c15d520c17538a2603b0be9f91b69f

Person to contact: 

  • Nicole Bourbonnais; Director Gender Centre-nicole.bourbonnais@graduateinstitute.ch
  • Tomiko Shine; Director Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign/SOLITUDE, dcapphrc@gmail.com

(3) Sis. Tomiko is also organizing the following discussion on Friday, April 19:

Third session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent: Side event – The Second International De… (sched.com)
https://thirdsessionpfpad2024.sched.com/event/1aS8k/side-event-the-second-international-decade-challenge-protecting-women-and-girls-of-african-descent-after-400-years-of-state-violence

The Second International Decade Challenge; Protecting Women and Girls of African Descent after 400 years of State Violence

Date, time and time zone of side event: Friday, April 19th, 9:45 – 10:45 am Geneva Time (3:45 am – 4:45 am Eastern Time)

Sponsoring organization(s) or entity/ies:

  • WAPB-thewapb.org -The WAPB is a Community Policing and Human Rights social entrepreneurship whose mission is to become the premier organization providing services, education, and training to eradicate violence against women during policing encounters, including female officers.
  • APP-HRC/SolitudeSolitude (wordpress.com) – A international human rights research consortium focusing on black women of African descent across the Diaspora building on a foundation of reparative justice.

Language(s) in which the side event will be held: English

Description of the side event:

This side event/workshop will look at the qualitative and quantitative cost of state violence through various institutions, laws, and policies to the black woman of African descent over generations. The panelists will also provide reparative justice models and recommendations that protect and re-define the African woman’s womb as a renewed space of generational healing, wealth, and nation building.

Contact details of the organizer: Crista Noel, cnoel@thewapb.org

Sis. Tomiko: Cultural Anthropologist and Mitigation Specialist
Founding Director: Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign
www.apphrc.com
https://m.facebook.com/apphrcusa/

“The seed you plant in love, not matter how small, will grow into a mighty tree of refuge” Afeni Shakur

“I believe in the sweat of love and in the fire of truth” Assata Shakur

In Recognition of Black Herstory Month

We remember Anti-Apartheid Icon Winnie Madikizela Mandela, former political prisoner and solitary confinement survivor (1936-2018)

In Recognition of Black History Month

Free Civil Rights Icon and Aging Prisoner
Imam Jamil al-Amin aka H. Rap Brown (incarcerated 2000-Present)

African Union African Diaspora Sixth Region High Council Announces Official Launch and Constitution

In May 0f 2022, Pan African activists from across the African Continent and around the Diaspora met in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia for the Roots-Synergy Roundtable.  There, work began on a unified strategy to firmly establish, after over 17 years of false starts, a roadmap for the African Diaspora to achieve recognition in the African Union as its Sixth Region, and for activists from around the world to launch a new era of cooperation to move the Pan African World forward.  Several online meetings of Pan African activists from Central America, South America, North America, Europe, Africa, Australia and the Middle East followed the Addis Ababa meeting and set the stage for the next major in-person conference to further this objective.

This work continued when these activists reconvened in Maputo, Mozambique in July of 2023.  At this time, the African Union African Diaspora Sixth Region High Council was launched.  A Constitution was written, ratified and released to the public, and is available to read below.

ADOPTED&APROVED_ConstitutionAUADS 6thregionHighCouncil. docx

Credit must go to Dr. Barryl A. Biekman, founder of the African Union African Diaspora Sixth Region Facilitators Working Group-Europe (AUADSFWG) for her tireless work in leading this endeavor.  Dr. Biekman has been a regular presence on the international scene for over 25 years, having participated in the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in Durban, South Africa in 2001 and working consistently with the Sixth Region Diaspora Caucus (SRDC) since its 2006 founding to establish representation for the African Diaspora in the African Union, pursuant to the AU’s African Diaspora Initiative which it had proclaimed in 2003.  She has attended meetings, conferences and public sessions at the African Union Headquarters in Addis Ababa, as well as the United Nations Headquarters in New York City and Geneve, Switzerland.  She has been a tireless advocate for the African Diaspora on the ground in The Netherlands where she currently lives, promoting the “Sixth Region” African Diaspora and mobilizing against such racist traditions as “Svarte Piet”, or “Black Pete”, a Christmas holiday tradition in many sectors of Dutch life which reinforces anti-Black stereotypes.

Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign Holds Hearing at the Organization of American States on “Loss of Resources and Generational Mass Incarceration’s Impact on Black Women”

We decided to petition for this hearing today because we are an organization that works to get people out who have been in for 30, 40, 50, 60 or more years in prison. Our organization is made up of mostly women who are working to get their folks out of prison. Right now in the United States you have two and three generations of men and women, mothers and fathers from the same family, incarcerated. All of them are attached to generations of women. For us today, this is not simply a hearing, this is a trial. This is something for 400 years we’ve been waiting. What you see here is, we are the daughters of the plantation, daughters of Maroons, daughters of Abolitionists, daughters of Freedom Fighters, daughters of Garveyites, daughters of Revolutionaries, and we are versus the United States, and they have been found guilty. The crime is the war on the Afrikan woman’s womb. Anything that has come out of the Afrikan woman’s womb in the last 400 years has been attacked, assaulted, decimated, incarcerated, imprisoned, and this will no longer be tolerated. This is unacceptable. Walter Rodney, in his book How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, talks about this underdevelopment. Thus, 400 years later, the Afrikan person that comes out of the Afrikan woman’s womb is still being underdeveloped by institutional racism and White Supremacy racism.

“So therefore, today, we sentence the US, and all the Western World that has benefited from our human resources, to 100 years of reparations that is to be paid in full. Reparative justice. In the next 10 to 20 years we want this abolition of prisons to commence. We want the extraction of our human resources from the human resource of the Afrikan woman’s womb to stop feeding the pipeline of institutional racism and generational incarceration. This will no longer be tolerated. We close the chapter today on the Department of Justice, the Prison Industrial Complex, any system entire that oppresses our bodies, our people, the Afrikan woman’s womb.

“Edward Baptist in his book, The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism, emphasizes this, that the extreme amounts of money that has been made from the human resources of Afrikan people, Dr. [Tasseli] McKay [has calculated] the price, so we say the [price] to be paid is 7.16 trillion dollars to the Black woman, only for the last four decades of incarceration, and we’re talking about one institution. Today’s verdict that has been passed is sealed. It cannot be undone. The seven testimonies and interventions that have occurred [here today and documented below are akin to the story of] the Walls of Jericho, and they will fall, tomorrow being the seventh day [November 7]. This verdict is sealed today by our ancestors, Alberta Williams King, Winnie Mandela, Maria Elena Moyano, Safiya Bukhari, Louise Little, La Mulatresse Solitude, and Fannie Lou Hamer. [The walls of Jericho] will fall today. I thank you.”

Thus the objective of this hearing, held at the offices of the Organization of American States (OAS) at 1889 F Street, NW in Downtown Washington, DC on Monday, November 6, was proclaimed by the organizer of this session, Ms. Tomiko Shine, cultural anthropologist, Founder and Director of Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign (APP-HRC), an organization dedicated to securing the freedom of those who have been held in penitentiaries and prisons for upwards of 20 to 50 years. Many of these aging people in prison are what we often refer to as Political Prisoners, members of organizations such as the Black Panther Party (BPP), American Indian Movement (AIM), MOVE and other political-dissident groups who were targeted under the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO). Others were convicted in tainted trials on questionable evidence in spite of their lack of political activism, and still others were handed draconian sentences for relatively minor offenses and have been imprisoned for decades. Practically all of the prisoners and former prisoners represented by APP-HRC have grown old under incarceration, and have faced struggles not only in securing their release through parole or exoneration, but also in adjusting to “life on the outside” after being freed. In practically all of these cases, the burden of their imprisonment has been felt most acutely by their families, particularly by Black women.

This hearing was presided over by the OAS’s Inter American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) for its 188th Session. The Commissioners on the panel were Ms. Margarette May Macaulay (President), Ms. Roberta Clarke (Second Vice President), Ms. Julissa Mantilla Falcón, and Ms. Tania Reneaum Panszi (Executive Secretary).

Ms. Maccaulay, President of the IACHR, opened the session, welcomed the presenters and received their testimonies, after which she and the Commissioners present asked several follow-up questions and offered their words of support and encouragement, and a request to remain connected to the presenters so they can receive further updates and calls to action from them.

Introductory Presentations by the Expert Panel

Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq., South Carolina-based human and civil rights attorney, director of the Malcolm X Center for Self Determination, founder and coordinator of WMXP Community Radio, chair of the US Human Rights Network’s Political Prisoners and State Repression Working Group, past co-chair of the National Jericho Movement for the release and freedom of all US-held political prisoners, was the first presenter:

Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq.

“The United States is party to several human rights treaties and conventions, and the issue of mass incarceration has raised concerns about violations of these treaties in the context of the disproportionate impact on Black women. Some of the key treaties include the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratified in 1992, the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, ratified in 1994, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, ratified in 1994, and the Universal Periodic Review along with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These treaties encompass fundamental human rights principles, including non-discrimination, the right to a fair trial, the prohibition of torture and cruel treatment, and economic and social rights. The impact of mass incarceration on Black women, including issues such as racial disparities in the criminal punishment system, access to education, health care, family separation, has led to concerns about these violations. Mass incarceration in the United States disproportionately affects Black women, and as a result they face various lifelong human rights challenges.

“My colleagues will detail the key human rights issues that Black women suffer as a result of these violations.

“The issues reflect systemic disparities in the criminal punishment system, a system which is grounded in the US history of slavery, apartheid, and racial violence. Viewed through a human rights lens, they are violations of fundamental human rights, particularly the right to equality, non-discrimination and dignity. Ongoing advocacy and reform efforts to address these human rights challenges and to promote a more just and equitable system are frustrated by the United States’ self-proclaimed exceptionalism, use of reservations, understandings and declarations when signing on to treaties, and a total lack of public and professional human rights knowledge, in the courts and the legislatures especially.

“Addressing mass incarceration and the associated human rights violations against Black women requires a multi-faceted approach. We suggest (1) Reparations. The US must create a commission to study the continuing impact of slavery, apartheid and centuries of White violence reflected in the criminal punishment system. It must devise and fund proposals for remediation and prevention of their perpetuation, including ensuring Black women full and complete access to legal representation and resources necessary to realize our full human potential. Legislative changes must occur at the federal and state levels to address laws and systemic issues contributing to mass incarceration and racial disparities in the criminal punishment system including data collection and transparency, racial bias training to raise public awareness about human rights, mass incarceration and the specific challenges that are faced by Black women.

“I thank you.”

Ms. Simone Harris read a letter from her son Rashid Harris, age 36, incarcerated since age 23 at James T. Vaughan Correctional Center, at Smyrna, Delaware with a sentence of life plus 527 years due to a habitual offender law, to his mother.

She concluded by saying, “My recommendations are to abolish the three-strike law, abolish life sentences, and to stop incarcerating juvenile minorities in their prime, which equates to genocide. Thank you.”

Ms. Krystal Young spoke about her experience, a struggle of several years against a bogus arrest and a threat of decades of imprisonment on a false charge. In 2015, she was arrested with her mother and twin brother for burglary and trespassing, was released after 9 days but was rearrested three months later on warrants based on false allegations stemming from a series of complaints of a neighbor. Her seven-year-old daughter began exhibiting psychological issues. She recounted the suffering of her grandmother, mother and daughter as she went through five different attorneys over the course of a two-year fight during which she was confronted with the possibility of facing 127 years in jail. Her case was finally dismissed, but the damage was done to her family. “It should be mandatory for any state government official to obtain any arrest history of police districts as some form of compensation for falsely accused victims. Thank you.”

Dr. Avon Hart-Johnson, president and co-founder of DC Project Connect, coming today as a support specialist, advocate, author and researcher, conducting studies in the United States and abroad, focused on several key recommendations for reforming the current carceral system (a prison, confinement and surveillance-based system of punishment):

Dr. Avon Hart-Johnson

“Today, I focus on four key areas and recommendations. First, Black women are largely incarcerated for crimes associated with survival and coping, in essence, criminalized mental health conditions, domestic violence, unaddressed substance use, has likely led to their incarceration. Recommendation number one: abolish prisons. When sanctions of a last resort are warranted, these women should be offered holistic care as a community-based alternative to restore health and well-being. Second, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 5 states in part: ‘No one should be subjected to cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment’, yet alarming reports of physical and psychological violations occur in women’s prisons every day. In 2015 alone, there were 25,000 incidents and allegations of sexual abuse, extortion, rape, groping, or other sexual related abuses in prison. Recommendation number two: we demand reparative justice, holding carceral systems responsible for past harms, current harms and preventing future harms. All prisons and halfway houses should be converted to healing centers, with emphasis placed on mental and physical health care, funded by the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Third, the United Nations recognizes the right to the highest attainable standards of physical and mental health, in particular Article 25. The denial of adequate mental health intervention and gender specific health care needs, and adequate menstrual products, in prison, result in women making dehumanizing tradeoffs between basic needs and hygiene. The use of medically unsafe trauma-inducing restraints and shackles on pregnant women should cease today. Recommendation number three: we demand that incarcerated women have access to adequate health care as a matter of human rights as a public imperative. Finally, and fourth, maternal incarceration has the greatest impact on children and intergenerational incarceration. According to the Universal Declaration on Human Rights Article 12, incarcerated persons have the right to family life, a protective factor that can mitigate the cycle of incarceration. The fourth recommendation: incarcerated women should not be arbitrarily separated from their families, and their right to family life must be respected and restored, with efforts made to ensure that contact is maintained between mothers and children, and vital family bonds preserved.

“Thank you for the opportunity to testify.”

“The total harm in under 50 years of mass incarceration comes to 7.16 trillion dollars. That’s more than half the value of the entire Black-White wealth gap. No other form of domestic state violence carried out in the United States since the beginning of the 20th century compares to the scope and scale of these effects. If we are ever going to move beyond mass captivity, beyond the mass exploitation of Black women’s bodies and labor on this continent, we need universal understanding in the US and around the world of the vast harms of mass incarceration.”
— Dr. Tasseli McKay

Attorney Maya Hylton-Garza, Esq. has worked with prisoners who have relatives who have been incarcerated, worked in cities like Baltimore, Oakland and Los Angeles. She spoke “about the primacy of the American criminal justice system from the perspective of someone who works inside it.

Attorney Maya Hylton-Garza, Esq.

“To put it plainly, it’s a mess. But calling it a mess is [insufficient]; what it truly is, is a horror show. The United States incarcerates more people than any other country, being responsible for about a quarter of the world’s imprisoned people. Despite accounting for only about 13% of the US population, Black people comprise 38% of that incarcerated population. Along with incarcerating more people than any other country, the US also incarcerates more women than any other country. Racial bias permeates every facet of the system, reflecting the … lineage from the present-day system to the earliest days of slavery. At the onset, we had Slave Codes, a separate and more severe set of crimes and punishment for slaves. Following emancipation, the existence of this dual system did not disappear. While we may no longer explicitly have a separate set of crimes and punishments for Black people, evidence of racially disparate treatment can be seen throughout the system. While the United States has not yet consistently and accurately [shared] data on arrest, prosecution and incarceration trends, what we do know is that there is clear evidence pf racially disparate arrests, racially disparate sentencing, [with] more and longer sentences given to Black people and racially disparate administration of parole and probation. Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign is an abolitionist organization that [argues that] the process of emancipation for all Black people in the United States cannot conclude until the criminal justice system is abolished. The Supreme Court … very explicitly acknowledged the possibility of racial prejudice influencing a jury’s decision in any criminal case. When faced with actual statistical evidence of racial bias influencing a death penalty case, they found it as ‘not unacceptable’, allowing the death penalty to stand. With a Supreme Court so comfortable with allowing an ‘acceptable amount’ of racial discrimination to infect every Black person’s interaction with the criminal justice system, there is no reform that could occur that would be able to repair the corrupt White Supremacist heart of the current system. Aging People in Prison seeks the dismantling of the systems that support and reify such oppression, including the police, the judiciary and the carceral state. Nothing less will set us free.”

Dr. Tasseli McKay, a social scientist and record of policy scholar at Duke University, shared “new figures from my research on the economic impact of mass incarceration on Black women.

Dr. Tasseli McKay

“For all of this century in the US, the huge Black-White wealth gap that is the legacy of slavery was slowly narrowing. Those gains, small and slow, were very hard won. But in the 1970s, following great Civil Rights progress in the US, our criminal legal system began to be mobilized against Black Americans in an intensely violent and far-reaching way. As it did, the wealth gap also began to widen again, in a way it had not since the ferocious anti-Black mass political violence of the late 1800s. During the mass incarceration years, the wealth of the typical Black household has dropped 75%, while that of the typical White household has risen 14%. Mass incarceration has brought tremendous harm to Black women, families and communities, and social scientific evidence makes it possible to rigorously calculate its economic impact. I’ve written two academic books about this work, carefully reviewed by top economists and criminal legal system scholars, and so I have great confidence in what I’m about to tell you about these costs. The criminalization of Black children and youth, and their pipelining out of educational and supportive institutions has sapped 4.31 trillion dollars. The perpetual punishment of formerly incarcerated Black adults, particularly their long-term exclusion from the formal workforce, has sapped 1.07 trillion dollars. The burdens and harms shunted onto partners and mothers of incarcerated Black adults total 434 billion dollars. The lifelong repercussions for Black children of the incarcerated, particularly in lost educational opportunity, total 452 billion dollars. And the community and population-scale damages, particularly impacts on Black infant mortality and adult life expectancy, total 890 billion dollars. The total harm in under 50 years of mass incarceration comes to 7.16 trillion dollars. That’s more than half the value of the entire Black-White wealth gap. No other form of domestic state violence carried out in the United States since the beginning of the 20th century compares to the scope and scale of these effects. If we are ever going to move beyond mass captivity, beyond the mass exploitation of Black women’s bodies and labor on this continent, we need universal understanding in the US and around the world of the vast harms of mass incarceration. We need reconstruction of the abusive public institutions that did these harms. And we need at least 7.16 trillion dollars in reparations to Black women and communities for mass incarceration. Thank you so much.”

Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq. made additional comments:

“I would simply add to the information and comments that have already been made in that when we talk about reparative justice, when we talk about reparations, we’re talking about full and complete reparations, and the full and complete reparations go far beyond the money that necessarily includes the rebuilding of the individual and of a people or peoples, like the abused adopted child. We long to know who and what we are, where we were kidnapped from, what were then our names, what would have been our language, what would have been our spiritual development system, what would have been our social and familial structure. There is no price that can be put on that; at the same time, every effort must be made to do so.”

Dr. Tasseli McKay added some historical context to the discussion of the harms caused to Black women and Black families, highlighting the intentional and official US policy nature of these harms, dating back to the Richard M. Nixon administration and even before that.

“I’d like to read a quote from John Ehrlichman, who was the domestic policy advisor to Richard Nixon, widely understood by people in my field as the forefather of mass incarceration. And I’m quoting him now:

‘The Nixon Campaign in 1968 and the Nixon White House after that had two enemies: the anti-war left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the people to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.’ [from an interview Ehrlichman gave to Dan Baum in 1994, published in the April 2016 issue of Harper’s Magazine — Editor.]

“I’d like to add that I think it’s important that we understand this as the domestic state violence that it is and has been, and that the impacts of that state violence on Black women in particular have been concealed of necessity, because the work that Black women have taken on in the face of this state violence has been to absorb, to cushion and to defend their families and communities against it, perpetually, and without their permission concealing the true magnitude of its effects. The costs of this system are so much greater than we have ever acknowledged and those costs have been borne by the most vulnerable among us, and because those costs could not come out of bank accounts, they have come out of bodies. Chris Wildeman’s research on the impacts of mass incarceration on population health in the United States shows that yes, mass incarceration has done definitive damage to our health as an entire population, and yes, those effects on life expectancy and infant mortality have been concentrated predominantly in Black communities. And yes, those effects on life, the years taken off of American lives by mass incarceration, have come off of Black women’s lives. When we look at the effects of rising Black male incarceration rates, beginning around 1978, on population health in the US, we see that the years of life lost came primarily from Black women. There’s so much that has happened, so much that has been concealed and so much strength that has been standing in resistance to this domestic state violence for many decades. Thank you so much for the time to speak to you.”

“I don’t understand why the American establishment doesn’t recognize this, and it doesn’t augur well for the reputation of the state, for this sort of thing to go on. And then I hear politicians on TV, in Congress and the Senate, Senators and Congressmen, talking about how America is not a racist country. That is the biggest, what I call ‘real politics’, because everybody looking around can recognize it, and yet they’re denying it, so how much trust can one have in the system?”
– IACHR President Margarette May Macaulay

The IACHR Commission members ask questions to the presenters.

The members of the Commission asked a number of follow-up questions. President Margarette May Macaulay added a comment and a question: “Thank you for the personal stories that show what these policies do to life and families. Thank you also for the empirical evidence that combines the information into research in action about these punitive policies that have been repeated from 1940 until today. You referred to identity reparations, and we would like to hear more about that. What are the triggers that cause the increasing harshness of the penalties?”

Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq. offered some additional perspective on the Black reparations struggle.

Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq. makes a point.

“To talk about reparations, the (IACHR) President rounds it out in a simple word: personhood, that full and complete reparations required restoration of personhood. We have since the Civil War in the United States, made demands for reparations, and the visibility and the intensity of that struggle has risen and fallen depending upon political circumstances. At the moment it enjoys great visibility and global recognition, and we credit that to the 2001 Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, which was the opportunity to globalize the issue and to bring together the Afrikan community globally in formulating the consensus that the DDPA is [important], and even more importantly and recently is the struggle to protect and defend the DDPA against the onslaught of the former, well, the colonizers, because some of them are still in place, and enslavers attempting to distract us from the consensus that was reached with the DDPA, and most importantly its civilization and expression of self-determination, setting forth the crimes against humanity and the basis for global reparations, slavery, colonization, apartheid and genocide, and that we must not allow the creation and the mandate that was given to the Permanent Forum on People of Afrikan Descent or the Agenda 2030 SDG’s, Sustainable Development Goals, to become the shiny objects that take us away from the DDPA and the significance of that expression of self-determination, which of course also includes the Five Elements that define those guidelines as to what would constitute full and complete reparations. We look forward to submitting further information on that point, and consistent with the questions that you have asked here, suffice it to say that the greatest violations continue to occur in the South, what we call ‘the Black belt’, which is where the Afrodescendant population was enslaved in the largest numbers and continues to this day to live despite our apparent mobility and our escape from bondage. Finally I would add that the US Constitution provides for the continued enslavement of people generally and Afrikan people particularly. It was a concession that was made to the South wherein the 13th Amendment is thought to abolish slavery, however it does not. It only shifts the enslavement of persons from private hands to public hands, the hands of the government. It provides that a person cannot be held in involuntary servitude except in the case of a crime. And of course it is the enslavers who have defined what human behavior is criminal. And that invariably falls heaviest on people of Afrikan descent and Afrikan women in particular. Thank you.”

“We have since the Civil War in the United States, made demands for reparations, and the visibility and the intensity of that struggle has risen and fallen depending upon political circumstances. At the moment it enjoys great visibility and global recognition, and we credit that to the 2001 Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, which was the opportunity to globalize the issue and to bring together the Afrikan community globally … and even more importantly and recently is the struggle to protect and defend the DDPA against the onslaught of the former, well, the colonizers, because some of them are still in place, and enslavers attempting to distract us from the consensus that was reached with the DDPA …”
— Attorney Efia Nwangaza, Esq.

Attorney Maya Hylton-Garza, Esq. spoke about state-run versus private institutions, racialized arrest practices and released prisoners being saddled with heavy debts to the state that had imprisoned them.

“I want to speak to two things, the question of abuse in state-run versus private facilities and the question of racialized arrest practices. … The United States Congress mandated under the Prison Rape Elimination Act a comprehensive study of sexual assault and sexual abuse in United States correctional facilities. That study … included a representative sample, i think, of maybe 400 United States correctional facilities. That study used state of the art methods and it did document the very substantial prevalence of sexual assault around the country and it highlights not only in adult prison facilities but in detention facilities that house children, very widespread prevalence of sexual assault and abuse. And further, I’ll note that to my knowledge there is no established difference in rates of abuse in private-run versus state-run facilities, and that isn’t intended to be offered in defense of private facilities so much as I think it speaks to the extent to which our public institutions have been harnessed to abusive ends in a time of mass incarceration.

“With regard to the question about racialized arrest practices, in the contemporary United States, 49% of Black men can expect to be arrested by the time they reach age 23. We’ve seen in the work of … Vesla Weaver and colleagues, [which] demonstrates that in fact, over the decades of mass incarceration, we have seen what she calls a great uncoupling of arrest from criminalized behavior such that arrest is now so racially targeted that it is less and less correlated with engagement in any criminalized activity and more strongly correlated with perceived race, and that racial disproportionality of course, as you all know well, continues at every level of the system and its impacts are so devastating, even at the point of arrest and policing as your remarks highlighted, many jurisdictions have implemented what they euphemistically call ‘proactive policing strategies’: stop-and-frisk, hotspot policing, various forms of aggressive police engagement and implementation of these policies we know from several rigorous social scientific studies is strongly correlated with a drop in well-being across the Black population of those cities. So, for example, we see Black students’ educational achievement drop in New York City with the implementation of stop-and-frisk, and there are examples like that from social science research across the country.

“I also want to speak to this question, which is very well taken, of individuals released from incarceration with tremendous debt to the state. To my knowledge, that practice is much more the rule than it is the exception, and those debts have to do with everything from system fees, parole monitoring fees, court fees, victim restitution, and an enormous contributor to that debt is child support enforcement. Many families have enormous debt to the child support enforcement system after the incarceration of a loved one, and often a five-figure debt, in particular because, in most states, that continues to rack up those arrears during incarceration, even though earning enough funds to pay those commitments is a true impossibility during that time. And to the also quite well taken question of what happens when individuals are released with debts that are far beyond their capacity to pay, what happens to those debts, there is fairly strong indication that those debts are paid by the women family members of incarcerated and released individuals. They are not forgiven. They are shunted onto those who can least afford them.”

Dr. Avon Hart-Johnson made further comments on behalf of mothers of incarcerated persons and the impact on families.

“I’d like to address the question about what happens when the mother is incarcerated. The first thing I want to say is that, when you incarcerate the mother, it has the greatest impact on the children. Let me give you an example. In Washington DC, we don’t have a prison. So therefore, when mothers are separated from their children, they are sent across the United States to serve their sentences. That could be California, Texas, West Virginia, for example. We know that in Washington DC, the zip codes that have the highest incarceration rates also have 16% of the people living at or below the poverty level. So how do you stay connected? Let’s talk about what happens in the family system. Well, first of all, it’s recognized as a crisis. Children are often not told where their parents are because of the stigma and shame associated with it, or perhaps the adults who are raising the children at home don’t want to emotionally burden the children. We know that about 11% of the fathers are taking care of children. We know that 11% of the children are going to go into foster care. And the vast majority are going to stay with the grandmother or grandparents who may be on a fixed income. So when we start to think about what happens with the children and why is this thing about intergenerational incarceration showing up, well, the short story is, parental incarceration is an adverse childhood experience. Probably 60% of us in this room have gone through an adverse childhood experience. It could be a frequent change of caregivers, it could be abuse, neglect, it could be violence or conflict in the home, or parental incarceration. The thing is, when children are exposed to contiguous stressors, it actually changes their genetics. So, there’s this science called epigenetics, and so when children are living in these situations, incarceration is probably just one issue, there are many complex issues going on at the same time. When the body is exposed to contiguous stressors, over and over again, it stays in a state of hyper-vigilance, and the cortisol levels are bring produced, and those kids are always in fight-or-flight, even if it doesn’t look like it, they’re in fight-ir-flight, and so therefore, the genes in the body will adjust, and it will start to put all of this energy in the fight-or-flight, rather than fighting off infections.”

Attorney Maya Hylton-Garza, Esq. spoke about efforts at reforming the carceral system:

“I just wanted to speak briefly on some reforms that are occurring. In the state of California, the Racial Justice Act was passed, which specifically tries to address the effects of racially disparate sentencing and arrests, and allows for somebody who has been convicted to bring forward evidence of racially discriminatory behavior and then allow for some type of reduction in sentencing. The law is extraordinary in the fact that it is retroactive, and it covers all families and anybody who has picked up a juvenile case, so as far as we’re concerned that’s basically everybody in the state of California who has been arrested and experienced … confinement. The law has been passed. We don’t know yet how the judges are going to handle that responsibility. It’s the Racial Justice Act, 2021. Right after George Floyd, people were very inspired to suddenly realize discrimination existed. And so, we don’t know yet. It leaves a lot to the judges in terms of how they’re going to handle each of those cases. But it does allow [for evidence of] racially discriminatory behavior to be used as evidence to prove the case, and so that is one example of reform. There are two other states that have passed Racial Justice Acts. Neither one of those are effective in any way. One is so broad that no one can use it and the other one is so narrow that no one can use it. The first one was so broad that it was repealed, and the second one is so narrow that it’s useless. We don’t know yet how California is going to handle this, how California judges are going to handle this power. I’m going to stay optimistic, but what we’ve seen in the United States is that there is a fear of too much justice, that because everyone has experienced racial discrimination, Black and Brown and Native American people have experienced racial discrimination that has impacted the way in which they engage with the carceral state, that reform would require everyone to be helped, and the United States is simply unwilling to do that.”

Closing Remarks from the Chair

IACHR President Margarette May Macaulay

IACHR President Margarette May Macaulay offered some closing comments. She noted that quite a few people have been released because DNA evidence showed their convictions were false, evidence was flawed and the convictions and sentences were unlawful. She noted that in other countries, “such persons will be compensated by the state for their mistake”. In the news, we see that people who are released in the US have received “no compensation, despite the claims about America’s largesse. Where is that when they are at fault?” There are similar issues with social welfare, in which recipients who were determined to have received Social Security and health benefits by mistake were ordered to repay years later (usually with onerous amounts of interest) regardless of their ability to pay. This had been reported on the previous day on the CBS News program 60 Minutes.

President Macaulay asked what the presenters would want the Commission to do to assist them in this matter, and expressed the desire to collaborate with them. IACHR wants to hear about the issues and specific complaints people have that are related to this case. The Web site and phone number are available for submitting information and complaints, and there is training available in some cases for Non Governmental Organizations.

Ms. Macaulay closed with these comments: “This is long past due, long, long past due. And I don’t understand why the American establishment doesn’t recognize this, and it doesn’t augur well for the reputation of the state, for this sort of thing to go on. And then I hear politicians on TV, in Congress and the Senate, Senators and Congressmen, talking about how America is not a racist country. That is the biggest, what i call ‘real politics’, because everybody looking around can recognize it, and yet they’re denying it, so how much trust can one have in the system? So please, let’s collaborate. And thank you, thank you, thank you for coming to us.”

About the IACHR

IACHR’s mission statements explain that

The IACHR is a principal and autonomous organ of the Organization of American States (“OAS”) whose mission is to promote and protect human rights in the American hemisphere. It is composed of seven independent members who serve in a personal capacity. Created by the OAS in 1959, the Commission has its headquarters in Washington, D.C. Together with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (“the Court” or “the I/A Court H.R.), installed in 1979, the Commission is one of the institutions within the inter-American system for the protection of human rights (“IAHRS”).

The formal beginning of the IAHRS was approval of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man at the Ninth International Conference of American States held in Bogota in 1948. There the OAS Charter (hereinafter “the Charter”) was adopted, which declares that one of the principles upon which the Organization is founded is the “fundamental rights of the individual.”

Full respect for human rights appears in several sections of the Charter, underscoring the importance that the Member States attach to it. In the words of the Charter, “the true significance of American solidarity and good neighborliness can only mean the consolidation on this continent, within the framework of democratic institutions, of a system of individual liberty and social justice based on respect for the essential rights of man.” The Charter establishes the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) as one of the principal organs of the OAS whose function is to promote the observance and protection of human rights and to serve as a consultative organ of the Organization in these matters.

The work of the IACHR rests on three main pillars:

      • the individual petition system;
      • monitoring of the human rights situation in the Member States, and
      • the attention devoted to priority thematic areas.

Operating within this framework, the Commission considers that inasmuch as the rights of all persons subject to the jurisdiction of the Member States are to be protected, special attention must be devoted to those populations, communities and groups that have historically been the targets of discrimination. However, the Commission’s work is also informed by other principles, among them the following: the pro homine principle, whereby a law must be interpreted in the manner most advantageous to the human being; the necessity of access to justice, and the inclusion of the gender perspective in all Commission activities.

According to the American Convention on Human Rights, the Commission shall be composed of seven members, who shall be persons of high moral character and recognized competence in the field of human rights, elected in a personal capacity by the OAS General Assembly from a list of candidates proposed by the governments of the Member States. Each of those governments may propose up to three candidates, who may be nationals of the State proposing them or of any other OAS Member State. When a slate of three is proposed, at least one of the candidates shall be a national of a State other than the one proposing the slate. The members of the Commission are elected for a four-year term and may be reelected only once.

For more information on IACHR and OAS, go to the Web site https://www.oas.org/en/IACHR/jsForm/?File=/en/iachr/mandate/composition.asp.

To View the Full Hearing Video

The full hearing in video form, ‘Loss of Resources and Impact of Intergenerational Incarceration on Black Women’, can be viewed at https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/sessions/?S=188 (scroll down to Monday’s hearings, APP-HRC is first hearing)

About Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign (APP-HRC)

APP-HRC is an organization dedicated to securing the freedom of those who have been held in penitentiaries and prisons for upwards of 20 to 50 years. Many of these aging people in prison are what we often refer to as Political Prisoners, members of organizations such as the Black Panther Party (BPP), American Indian Movement (AIM), MOVE and other political-dissident groups who were targeted under the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Counter-Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO). Others were convicted in tainted trials on questionable evidence in spite of their lack of political activism, and still others were handed draconian sentences for relatively minor offenses and have been imprisoned for decades. Practically all of the prisoners and former prisoners represented by APP-HRC have grown old under incarceration, and have faced struggles not only in securing their release through parole or exoneration, but also in adjusting to “life on the outside” after being freed.

We ask you to support APP-HRC by making a donation to https://www.apphrc.com/Donate.php; Aging People in Prison Human Rights Campaign (https://apphrc.com) so they can continue to do their human rights reparative justice work of breaking the systemic pipeline to mass/intergenerational incarceration.

 

Trying to Make Sense of the Israel-Palestine Conflict

The Black Freedom Struggle often finds itself being pulled in multiple directions all at once.  We must navigate the political intrigues of two dominant political parties that take turns trying to convince us they are our only true friends (Democrats in the areas of voting rights, police accountability and anti-discrimination statutes, Republicans in the areas of gun rights, Straight  Black Pride and pull-up-by-your-bootstraps economic independence, though both sides often lie about these things) and enacting policies that make us believe they actually wish for our marginalization or even outright destruction (support for corporate interests that abuse our communities, overthrow and murder of Afrikan, Central American and South American leaders that do not obey the orders of Washington).  We must try to make sense of the many and often tangled organizations that, despite their common concern for a free, prosperous, self-determining and safe Black Community, seem to often be at odds with each other as to how to accomplish that allegedly common goal.  We are concerned about our livelihoods and the access to employment, although we often see that the industrialized society that provides us sustenance is also responsible for the slow (and not-so-slow) destruction of the very planet on which we depend for our lives. 

And then we come to the area of world affairs, where two communities with which Black People often been allied but have also had a stormy relationship find themselves locked in a centuries-old struggle, one that even goes back to the Bible and the Q’uran.  Jews, who faced their own genocide at the hands of Hitler’s Nazi Germany, have stood up to the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis alongside us, even dying with us in the Freedom Rides.  We weep for the victims of suicide bombings and terrorist attacks.  We also weep for those whose communities are constantly subjected to a state of modern-day apartheid and slavery that inspires those very same terrorist attacks in response.  We see, in the repression of the Palestinians and the West’s wars against Iraq and Iran, similar acts of oppression and genocide that were committed against us.  But we have also fumed at the loss of Black businesses in our neighborhoods, often replaced by businesses run by the very people, on both sides, with whom we have felt solidarity in the past.  And, when political power has been obtained, we often feel we are being left out by our erstwhile allies who, in some cases, have suddenly become adversaries.

Most, if not all, of these misgivings, however, vanish when we see an entire people being subjected to what we can only describe as acts of genocide from an overwhelming military force.  The scenes of elders, women and children huddled in blankets, often covered in their own blood, in the lobby of a hospital, or the sight of a collapsed building which we know has entombed entire families that medical and rescue workers already know they will not reach in time to save them all leave us in a state of heartbreak, outrage and helplessness.  All the while, representatives of a global power use the history of genocide and terrorism they have faced to justify acts of stomach-turning barbarity in reprisal for the acts of “militants”, using the doctrine of justifiable self-defense to make a case for the collective punishment of a people that claims eight to ten times the number of casualties they have suffered. 

For many of us, it’s enough of a challenge to break away from our own lives and allow ourselves to feel these people’s pain.  It is another thing to try to understand what is happening and why, and what we, with our limited knowledge, limited resources and infinitesimal power, can do about it.

Fortunately, there are researchers and activists who can help us gain some small understanding of what is happening, so we can begin to formulate a way forward out of the madness.  We will begin our effort to introduce you to some of them here.

Heather Gray (; https://myemail.constantcontact.com/About-Heather-Gray.html?soid=1109359583686&aid=DJnBqKIsFlM; hmcgray@earthlink.net) is the founder of Justice Initiative, an important source of news and analysis on issues of human rights and resistance in the United States and around the world.  The conflict between Israel and Palestine, which in reality is now an Israeli assault upon the overwhelmingly-civilian population in Gaza, in her words, “is taking its toll on me as I assume it is for many of you.”

At this writing, close to 8,500 Palestinians have been killed in the unrelenting Israeli attacks, including an estimated 2,500 to 3,500 children.  (Those numbers could be much higher by the time you read this.)  While the government of Israel insists the assault is necessary to ensure the safety of Israeli citizens after the October 7 attack by a faction of Hamas that reportedly killed 1,400 people and took another 200 hostage, international observers are calling the Israeli military retaliation against civilian targets in Gaza a gross violation of international law.  As Justice Initiative continues its voluminous release of information and analysis on this conflict, Ms. Gray has reached out to those who are directly impacted by the ongoing violence and those with relevant analysis to share their thoughts with her.  Her appeal is below.  In the meantime, she has herself shared numerous analyses and historical pieces on Israel, Zionism, Palestine, the Oslo Accords that were supposed to have ushered in a solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict and brought about a lasting peace some 30 years ago, and how that hopeful solution crumbled in the rubble of acrimony, oppression and violence that has been referred to by a long list of international analysts, including former US President Jimmy Carter, as a system of apartheid.

This is the appeal for comments from Ms. Heather Gray:

United Nations Comments on the Middle East conflict

Dear all:

I am seeking comments from readers about the Middle East conflict. If you could please share your thoughts and/or additional articles about this conflict and please send them to me at: hmcgray@earthlink.net

Also, on October 26 the United Nations General Assembly held a meeting of all members of the United Nations to discuss this conflict. Click here to listen to this 3 hour long gathering to discuss this tragic conflict from what appeared to be comments from all the members of the United Nations from throughout the world. Here is the YouTube link yet again and also the commentary from the YouTube posting of this UN meeting does not begin until about 12 minutes into the video.

Below is also the narrative from the UN regarding this October 26, 2023 UN meeting. The narrative was taken from the UN YouTube posting.

Heather Gray
Justice Initiative
October 28, 2023

Ms. Gray also posted a report, as she mentioned above, on the recent United Nations resolution calling for a cease-fire, the provision of emergency aid to Gaza and the release of the hostages currently being held by the Hamas faction that had initiated the confrontation on October 7.  The resolution was overwhelmingly supported over the weekend of October 27 by the UN member states, but among the relatively few dissenters were, as many expected, Israel and the United States.

UN General Assembly adopts Gaza resolution calling for
immediate and sustained ‘humanitarian truce’

General Assembly: Tenth emergency special session (resumed), 39th plenary meeting

October 26

Illegal Israeli actions in occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Item 5).

The United Nations General Assembly, in New York, is holding an emergency special session on the Israel-Palestine conflict, amid a continuing deadlock at the Security Council.

Opening the meeting today (26 Oct), the President of the General Assembly, Dennis Francis, said, “I urge the membership to use today’s session not to further fan the flames of hate, division, and revenge. Let us seize the opportunity, instead, to unify our purpose and our actions to save lives and to end violence.”

The Permanent Observer to the UN of the State of Palestine, Riyad H. Mansour, noted, “7,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israel in the last two weeks. 70 per cent of all those killed are women and children. Almost all killed are civilians. Is this the war some of you are defending? Let me repeat, is this the war some of you are defending? Can this war be defended?

Mansour concluded, “Finally, I appeal to all of you – vote to stop the killing. Vote for humanitarian aid to reach those whose very survival depends on it. Vote to stop this madness. You have a chance to do something. To give an important signal. Choose justice not vengeance. Choose to defend the law not justify its breach. Choose peace not more wars.”

The Permanent Representative of Israel, Gilad Erdan, called the events of October 7 a “massacre” and said that what ensued “has nothing to do with the Palestinians.”

Erdan continued, “Nothing. It has nothing to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict, or the Palestinian question. This is not a war with the Palestinians. Israel is at war with the genocidal-jihadist Hamas terror organization. Only. It is the law-abiding democracy of Israel against modern day Nazis.

Addressing Member States, the ambassador asked, “Do you not think it’s unbelievable that this resolution here today and this session are not solely focused on Hamas’ atrocities? When reading this resolution, Hamas seems to be missing in action. The drafters of the resolution claim to be concerned about peace, yet the depraved murderers who initiated this war are not even mentioned in the resolution. Are not even mentioned. They see each one of you as puppets.”

The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates of Jordan, Ayman Safadi, noted that his country had introduced a resolution to be voted on at the end of the session.

Safadi said, “It is at such times of cruelty, inhumanity and total disregard for international law that we must speak out clearly and unequivocally. There is no room for gray areas here. We must stand for life, for justice, for peace. We must stand against this war on Gaza. And the humanitarian catastrophe it is causing. We must stand on the side of our human values and for the charter of these United Nations. History will judge us.”

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, also participated in the meeting, saying, “Today in New York, and the United Nations, I say frankly, to the American statesmen, who are now managing the genocide in Palestine, that we do not welcome the expansion of the war in the region. But I warn – if the genocide in Gaza continues, they will not be spared from this fire. It is our home and West Asia is our region. We do not compromise with any party and any side, and we have no reservation when it comes to our homes’ security.”

The emergency session takes place after the Security Council failed on Wednesday to adopt two resolutions on addressing the humanitarian crisis. China and Russia vetoed a United States-led draft resolution and a second Russian-backed resolution failed to secure sufficient votes in favour.

This followed failures for unity at the Council, last week. A Russian-led draft resolution calling for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” was voted down last Monday and the following Wednesday, the US vetoed a Brazilian-led text that urged “humanitarian pauses” to deliver aid to millions in the Gaza Strip.

More from the International Community

An article on the open-source research site Wikipedia (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reactions_to_the_2023_Israel–Hamas_war) also describes the reactions of members of the international community:

On 7 October 2023, a large escalation of the Gaza–Israel conflict began with a coordinated offensive by multiple Palestinian militant groups against Israel. A number of countries, including many of Israel’s Western allies, such as the United States and a number of European countries, condemned the attacks by Hamas, expressed solidarity for Israel and stated that Israel has a right to defend itself from armed attacks, while countries of the Muslim world (including the Axis of Resistance) have expressed support for the Palestinians, blaming the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories as being the root cause for the escalation of violence. The events prompted several world leaders to announce their intention to visit Israel, including US President Joe Biden,[1] French President Emmanuel Macron,[2] German Chancellor Olaf Scholz,[3] and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.[4]

Numerous countries called for a ceasefire and de-escalation. International organizations, students organizations, charities, ecumenical Christian organizations, and Jewish and Islamic groups commented on the situation. On 27 October 2023, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for an immediate and sustained humanitarian truce and cessation of hostilities, adopted by a vote of 121 states to 14, with 44 abstentions.[5]

Again, notable among the votes opposing the cease-fire and delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza were Israel and the United States.

What triggered this military assault?

According to another Wikipedia article on the Israel-Hamas War timeline (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2023_Israel–Hamas_war), the Israel-Hamas War, as it has been called, was triggered by an assault that, according to the Israeli Defense Forces, included the firing of hundreds of rockets and killed over 1,400 people and kidnapped two hundred, launched by Palestinian militant groups associated with Hamas on Israeli settlements and a music festival near Gaza:

The 2023 Israel–Hamas war began on October 7, 2023 when Hamas launched an unprecedented multi-faceted and sustained assault on Israel from the Gaza Strip, on the 50th Anniversary of the Yom Kippur War.

Ms. Gray also shared an article by Michael Chossudovsky (“Justified Vengeance” and the Invasion of Gaza: Palestine Is Portrayed as “The Aggressor”), which we are linking to for anyone who wants to read it in its entirety.  Chossudovsky gives an analysis of the Israel-Palestine conflict, describes the Israeli assault on Gaza as “a criminal undertaking based on Israel’s doctrine of ‘Justified Vengeance’ which was first formulated in 2001”, and further states that the October 7 attack that precipitated this escalation in the conflict was actually a “false flag” operation by “a faction” of Hamas that was in contact with the Israeli Mossad, all part of a larger plan to first isolate Gaza from the West Bank, weaken the West Bank, then justify a military operation against Gaza to take control of the entirety of Israel and Palestine, all under the direction of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his regime.

The “Justified Vengeance” doctrine propounds in no uncertain terms that (despite its limited military capabilities) Palestine rather than Israel is “the aggressor” and that Israel has the right to defend itself.

This doctrine of “Justified Vengeance”, however, bears all the hallmarks of a justification of “collective punishment” to be aimed at the Palestinian civilian population, including threats to bomb hospitals, which are blatant violations of international law and ventures into the realm of acts of genocide.

But, wasn’t the Israeli-Palestinian issue supposed to have been solved decades ago?  Weren’t the efforts of President Jimmy Carter in the 1970s (with Israeli leaders Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat) and then President Bill Clinton in the 1990s (with Israeli Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin and Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat) supposed to have solved the issues of Israel’s hostilities with its neighbors and with Palestine, ushering in a new era of Middle East peace?

The Oslo Accords: 30 Years of Dashed Hopes

The Middle East-oriented Al Jazeera news network published an article on September 13, 2023, What were the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestinians?, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/13/what-were-oslo-accords-israel-palestinians.  Here is an excerpt from that article:

What were the Oslo Accords?

The first Oslo Accord, known as Oslo I, was signed on September 13, 1993. The agreement between the Israeli and Palestinian leadership saw each side recognise the other for the first time. Both sides also pledged to end their decades-long conflict.

A second accord, known as Oslo II, was signed in September 1995 and went into more detail on the structure of the bodies that the peace process was supposed to form.

The Oslo Accords were supposed to bring about Palestinian self-determination, in the form of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. This would mean that Israel, which was formed on the land of historic Palestine in 1948 in an event Palestinians know as the Nakba, would accept Palestinian claims to national sovereignty. The claims, however, would only be limited to a fraction of historic Palestine, with the rest left to Israel’s sovereignty.

To meet that goal several steps would need to be taken, including the phased withdrawal of the Israeli military from the Palestinian territories it had illegally occupied since 1967, and the transfer of authority to a Palestinian administration, except for final status issues, including the status of Jerusalem (the eastern half of which is occupied Palestinian land) and Israel’s illegal settlements, which would be negotiated at a later date.

The accords therefore led to the creation of the supposedly temporary Palestinian Authority (PA), and the division of territory in the West Bank into Areas A, B and C, denoting how much control the PA has in each. which to this day administers limited rule over the two areas.

A final treaty was to be reached in five years – but that has not happened. 

Right-wing Israelis had no desire to give the Palestinians any concessions, and did not want any agreements with the PLO, which they considered a “terrorist organisation”. Israeli settlers also feared it would lead to their eviction from the illegal settlements in the occupied territories.

Elements of the far-right were so opposed to the Oslo Accords that Rabin himself was assassinated in 1995 for signing them. Among the people who had threatened Rabin before his death was Itamar Ben-Gvir, now Israel’s National Security Minister.

Meanwhile, Palestinian groups, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, warned that a two-state solution would forgo the right of Palestinian refugees to return to the historic lands seized from them in 1948 when Israel was created. …

The Oslo Accords witnessed a slow decline, with Israel continuing its occupation of Palestinian land and refusing to withdraw militarily from the majority of the West Bank while continuing to conduct raids into land considered under the full administration of the PA.

Following Rabin’s death, a number of Israeli leaders who opposed the accords came to power, among them current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as well as Ariel Sharon.

The Web site Mondoweiss, “News & Opinion about Palestine, Israel & the United States”, published an analysis by Dr. Mustapha Barghouthi, Thirty years after the Oslo Accords: facing a reality of apartheid (https://mondoweiss.net/2023/09/thirty-years-after-the-oslo-accords-facing-a-reality-of-apartheid/), in which he states:

After thirty years, it became evident that the “dream” of establishing a Palestinian state through the Oslo agreement was merely a nightmare with continued Israeli military occupation. It has become evident that the Oslo Accords did no more than consolidate the Israeli occupation, as the Accords did not include the discontinuation of Israeli settlement activities in the occupied territories.

The U.S. administration and the rest of the international community continued to issue statements about how settlements are obstacles to peace but failed to exercise pressure on Israel to stop the growth of Israeli settler colonialism, leading to the loss of the possibility of a “two-state solution,” and with it, the potential for real peace.

Protests Against the Israel-Hamas War Around the World

Public outcry has been massive.  Grand Central Station in New York City was the scene of a massive protest by Jewish Voices for Peace and a number of allied organizations based on their repeated demands “Not in Our Name” and “Never Again, for Anyone”.  DemocracyNow! host Amy Goodman personally interviewed several Palestinian, Jewish and Afrikan American activists, including university professors and local and state representatives, who attended the massive rally with the intent on being arrested or had been arrested over the previous two weeks in similar protests.  Direct actions have taken place in Baltimore, Maryland and Washington, DC, as well as other cities across the United States and around the world.  A representative of the Palestinian people attended the 2023 National Black Radical Political Convention (NBRPC) in Baltimore over the weekend of October 28-29 and reported that of the 8,000-plus Palestinians killed in the Israeli assault at that time, an estimated 13 were confirmed to be “militants”.  NBRPC is issuing a statement of solidarity with the Palestinian people, as are practically all activist and political organizations that have been rather disingenuously lumped together as the “radical Left” by right-wing politicians, officials and activists.  A Wikipedia article on the 2023 Israel-Hamas War protests (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Israel–Hamas_war_protests) details direct actions being taken around the world.

The 2023 Israel–Hamas war sparked protests, demonstrations, and vigils around the world.[8] These events focused on a variety of issues related to the conflict, including demands for a ceasefire, an end to the blockade, returning Israeli hostages, protesting war crimes, and providing humanitarian aid to Gaza. Protests against Israeli action in Gaza were notably large across the Middle East and North Africa, particularly following the al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion.[9]

In some European countries, public support for Palestinian human rights was criminalized, with countries such as FranceGermany, the United Kingdom, and Hungary restricting pro-Palestinian political speech.[10] The conflict also sparked large protests at Israeli and U.S. embassies around the world.[11] On 28 October, Mondoweiss claimed the protests against Israeli actions in Gaza were the largest anti-war protests in the United States since the Iraq War protests.[12]

We do not know how this all will end.  As mentioned above, many felt the Oslo Accords were destined to bring about what we often refer to in social gatherings as “Peace in the Middle East”.  But the decades of grievance brought on by the 1948 creation of the State of Israel at the expense of the Palestinian population that already lived there, the claim of ancestral ownership going back millennia by many Israelis, the counter-claims that many of the Zionists were not the descendants of the original Hebrews, the fires of acrimony fanned by religious dogma, and the cries for vengeance by the survivors of the wars and attacks on both sides seem to have locked the Israeli and Palestinian people in an eternal conflict of hit-and-run terrorist attacks and military strikes that looks like it could last an eternity, despite the masses of Jewish, Palestinian and other Arab activists that have often come together in other parts of the world to call for peace and an egalitarian society for Israelis and Palestinians alike.  While civil society grassroots activists all seem to agree that we want peace, those in positions of authority often seem drunk on their political and military power and are all too willing to pour gasoline on an already volatile situation, justifying terrorist attacks like those on October 7 as a response to decades of political repression, and defending the wholesale bombing of cowering, helpless civilians in Gaza under a doctrine of “Justified Vengeance”.  They apparently never listened to the lyrics of a 2003 song by Michael Franti and Spearhead in 2003: “You can bomb the world to pieces, but you can’t bomb it into peace.”